> > > > My very quick review shows that this may all be present and then it is a > matter > > of test cases and the compliance document. And that's a good result. > Sometimes > > people do work and don't update tickets. > > > My hazy recollection is that someone looked into this. Maybe in prior > POSIX Compliance projects? >
Last year when I was porting ndbm.h I made several queries regarding this directory. Even after doing all the changes correctly, the port was not successful. Later I found out that the ndbm was calling a hash function from search.h. The headers in this directory need to be updated first. Me and Joel even had discussion about this in newlib mailing list but got no positive response from them. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2019/017046.html https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-June/026205.html --Vaibhav Gupta
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
