- Am 12. Dez 2018 um 4:52 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:11 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I tried to update the COPYING patch with the GCI contributors.
>>
>> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-December/
- Am 11. Dez 2018 um 22:08 schrieb Jiri Gaisler j...@gaisler.se:
> On 12/11/18 3:39 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Hello Jiri,
>>
>> On 11/12/2018 15:24, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Hello Jiri,
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
- Am 11. Dez 2018 um 16:47 schrieb Jiri Gaisler j...@gaisler.se:
> On 12/11/18 4:01 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 11/12/2018 15:55, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
Even if the screen is a guide of what to expect in some cases.
How does the smp support in sis switch back and forth betw
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:11 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to update the COPYING patch with the GCI contributors.
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-December/023957.html
>
> Unfortunately the Git author names are not properly set
Thank you. This is now committed.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:24 PM 18Y5C31 ZENON HANS TANEKA <
zenon.hans.tan...@dhs.sg> wrote:
> Dear Dr Joel,
>
> I have made all the appropriate changes and created the patch file for
> it. Thank you!
>
> Zenon Hans Taneka
> 18Y5C31
>
---
testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am| 6 ++-
.../psxtests/psxhdrs/net/if/if_freenameindex.c | 47 +
.../psxtests/psxhdrs/net/if/if_indextoname.c | 49 ++
testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/net/if/if_nameindex.c | 47 ++
On 12/11/18 3:39 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Jiri,
>
> On 11/12/2018 15:24, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Hello Jiri,
>>
>> On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>>> What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
>>>
>>> I have added SMP capability to the sis simulator, and have tested it
>
On 11/12/18 11:52 pm, Michael Westfall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to use RSB to build the cross compiler toolchain for rtems 4.10 /
> powerpc, and after a couple of hours working (mostly spent building newlib),
> RSB
> failed with the following output:
> config: tools/rtems-gdb-7.11-1.cfg
>
Thanks. I have pushed this!
I need to figure out how much you guys left to do for psxhdrs. :)
--joel
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:41 AM Marçal Comajoan Cara <
mcomajoanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> poll.h implements poll() which is not supported by RTEMS according
> to the RTEMS POSIX 1003.1 Complianc
This patch serves to update all the images in the RTEMS documentation with
the redrawings we did during GCI 2018.
All the redrawings included in the patch were made by me except
images/c_user/states which was made by LukaMag.
Patch:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yGMIWGOyDKoyma6YZZTtxRyyPVLqPF_
poll.h implements poll() which is not supported by RTEMS according
to the RTEMS POSIX 1003.1 Compliance Guide. See #3657.
This work was part of GCI 2018.
---
testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 1 +
testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/poll/poll.c | 50 +
2 files changed, 51
On 12/11/18 3:47 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 15:42, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>> On 12/11/18 3:24 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Hello Jiri,
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
I have added SMP capability to the s
On 12/11/18 4:01 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 15:55, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>>> Even if the screen is a guide of what to expect in some cases.
>>>
>>> How does the smp support in sis switch back and forth between the
>>> cores? Per cycle, instruction, etc. Qemu switches per instruction
Use Objects_Information::objects_per_block to provide this information.
Add and use _Objects_Is_auto_extend().
Update #3621.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/objectimpl.h| 27
cpukit/rtems/src/rtemsobjectgetclassinfo.c | 2 +-
cpukit/score/src/objectallocate.c
Use functions instead of macros. Add missing
rtems_configuration_get_maximum_*() functions.
Update #3621.
---
cpukit/Makefile.am | 1 +
cpukit/include/rtems/config.h | 3 +-
cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/config.h | 22 ++--
cpukit/libmisc/monitor/mon-config.c | 18 +
Sebastian Huber (3):
score: Remove Objects_Information::auto_extend
rtems: Use object information to get config max
score: Static Objects_Information initialization
cpukit/Makefile.am | 2 +
cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs.h| 450 +
On 11/12/2018 15:55, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
Even if the screen is a guide of what to expect in some cases.
How does the smp support in sis switch back and forth between the
cores? Per cycle, instruction, etc. Qemu switches per instruction
translation block as I recall.
The scheduling slice is (dyn
On 12/11/18 3:33 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> The order in which threads are assigned to cores has changed since the
> first smp work. It used to be from 0 up, now from the highest core
> associated with a scheduler down. If that's the only difference, the
> screen is out of date.
Good to know, thi
On 11/12/2018 15:42, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
On 12/11/18 3:24 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Jiri,
On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
I have added SMP capability to the sis simulator, and have tested it
with the smptests from rtems git. I ha
On 12/11/18 3:24 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Jiri,
>
> On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>> What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
>>
>> I have added SMP capability to the sis simulator, and have tested it
>> with the smptests from rtems git. I have noticed that the referenc
The order in which threads are assigned to cores has changed since the
first smp work. It used to be from 0 up, now from the highest core
associated with a scheduler down. If that's the only difference, the screen
is out of date.
Even if the screen is a guide of what to expect in some cases.
How
Hello Jiri,
On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
I have added SMP capability to the sis simulator, and have tested it
with the smptests from rtems git. I have noticed that the reference
output (*.scn) are not equivalent to what the simulator o
What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
I have added SMP capability to the sis simulator, and have tested it
with the smptests from rtems git. I have noticed that the reference
output (*.scn) are not equivalent to what the simulator or real hardware
outputs. It seems that the cpus are numb
Hello,
I was trying to use RSB to build the cross compiler toolchain for rtems
4.10 / powerpc, and after a couple of hours working (mostly spent building
newlib), RSB failed with the following output:
config: tools/rtems-gdb-7.11-1.cfg
package: powerpc-rtems4.10-gdb-7.11-x86_64-linux-gnu-1
buildin
---
LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause b/LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause
index df6c995f98..60a74e9adf 100644
--- a/LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause
+++ b/LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause
@@ -8,8 +8,20 @@ which you want to use this license f
Hello Joel,
On 03/12/2018 07:24, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 23/11/2018 13:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Use the latest plain text formatting of the GPL-2.0 as published by the
FSF:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
The current RTEMS license refers to the GPL-2.0, so the source
Hello,
I tried to update the COPYING patch with the GCI contributors.
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-December/023957.html
Unfortunately the Git author names are not properly set up. We have:
ABR290B 44733601+abr2...@users.noreply.github.com 2018-11
ABR290B abhimanyuraghuvansh...@
27 matches
Mail list logo
