On 12/11/18 3:24 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Jiri,
>
> On 11/12/2018 15:15, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>> What is the status of the smptests of RTEMS 5 ?
>>
>> I have added SMP capability to the sis simulator, and have tested it
>> with the smptests from rtems git. I have noticed that the reference
>> output (*.scn) are not equivalent to what the simulator or real hardware
>> outputs. It seems that the cpus are numbered backwards compared to the
>> .scn files.
>
> the .scn files are not up to date. Also the test output is quite test
> dependent and repeated test runs my produce different output.
>
> The best method to check if a test passed is to check if the
>
> *** END OF TEST XYZ ***
>
>
> message is printed. Which real target did you use to run the tests? I
> will do a test run tomorrow on a N2X.


My hardware setup is a Pender XC6S FPGA board with a 4-core leon3 design
compiled from the latest public leon3/grlib VHDL sources. The hardware
does not have an FPU at the moment which might be why some tests are
failing - I will investigate...



Attachment: pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to