Communities,
I believe this should be interesting to several participants of these three
lists with respect to the HTTP protocol, associated protocols and the future
direction of authentication.
Lisa asked me to forward you all this invitation to the BoF, 9pm - 10pm Wed
at ApacheCon this coming
Mladen, maybe you aught to have deleted the @author tag while you were at it :)
prakash shanmugam wrote:
hello mturk
i want to know how to store a *.doc file ,or *.pdf file in MYSQL
database using JSP or SERVLET as a front end
if you know the asnwer please reply me soon its very importa
prakash shanmugam wrote:
hai if you can help me it will be a big relief for me
now iam using tomcat 5.0 and linux as my server machine and the client
machine are windows xp
in my coding iam using JSP and SERVLETS. the problem is i want to store
images and pdf files into mydatabase . the backend i
Someone might want to review the 2nd to last paragraph here;
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.0.30/bin/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks, please DON'T work around APR problems without hollering at the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list! SVN is equally guilty. APR remains a piece of crap on
some platforms until all these bizzare little edge cases are reported
back to the project.
The apr devs would thank you :)
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rainer Jung wrote:
If no critical bugs will be found, we will have a formal release vote
starting at Friday, July 7th.
Out of curiousity, how is an existing bug a showstopper to releasing
this 1.2.16 candidate? (The IBM platform quirk you just caught.)
I'd like to see this keep moving unless
Rainer Jung wrote:
For the next feature release I will prepare the use of release
candidates, because I think then the naming will look more familiar to
users.
You mean 1.2.16 three times over? Please don't...
Version numbers are cheap :)
Once the tag and roll is there, it's far less confus
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
would you mind putting it on
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
first?
Nope. There is no version/platform directory
structure inside.
Uhm - then create one? /dev/dist/ has the distinction of containing
anything any RM wants to create. ww
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
would you mind putting it on
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
first?
Nope. There is no version/platform directory
structure inside.
Uhm - then create one? /dev/dist/ has the distinction of containing
Rainer Jung wrote:
I'll care about that, since it looks like I'll do 1.2.18 now.
But I will only update documentation on tomcat.apache.org/dev. I'm
really thinking about rolling back the premature publication of newer
doc on tomcat.apache.org. I think, doc there should not be more recent,
than
Costin Manolache wrote:
The svn messages are quite horrible IMO. Is there any way to suppress them
in future ?
Yes - it's really this project's fault that you didn't adopt the suggestion
that dev@ discussion and commits@ notification don't belong on the same list ;-)
And No - locking and unloc
Mladen Turk wrote:
Bill, IIRC you have one for building
httpd? Any chance you create this build?
I had mine IS 10, but the license was for my previous
employer, so I'm unable to use it any more.
I hate to do this, but I have to say no, until sometime next week; right now
I'm swamped, and the
Guys, let me clarify, you are only paying attention to ';' following the
QUERY_STRING delimiter '?', correct?
';' means nothing special before the '?', double check your interpretation
of RFC 2616. I can have /foo.bar;bash?v1=a;v2=b (or ...?v1=a&v2=b) and that
semi is part of the foo.bar;bash fi
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys, let me clarify, you are only paying attention to ';' following the
QUERY_STRING delimiter '?', correct?
';' means nothing special before the '?', double check your
interpretation
of RFC 2616.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys, let me clarify, you are only paying attention to ';' following the
QUERY_STRING delimiter '?', correct?
';' means nothing special before the '?', double check your
interpretation
of RFC 2616.
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Returning to my example:
JkMount /*.jsp worker1
http://localhost/;jsp-examples/jsp2/;simpletag/;hello.jsp
.jsp-examples simpletag and hello.jsp are parameters. (According to the
3.3 of the ref).
So the mapping is
//jsp2// -> no worker.
I would concur...
http://l
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Comments?
Another tactic is to give up, and return an error code of some sort in
Tomcat if the URL contains a path parameter (since they are not part of
the path, are not handled properly, and have no useful usage at the
moment).
+1 - this
Mladen Turk wrote:
Trent Nelson wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Just out of interest, is there any motivation to switch to Nullsoft's
Installer for future mod_jk/isapi_redirect releases? Given that
tomcat's win32 installer uses this, and it's free, I would think that
would be a better option than I
Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Nullsoft lacks advanced IIS virtual directory
creation/deletion. I suppose it can be done with
multiple .vbs scripts.
EWWW - no :) They are keys.
No, they are not. Neither are filters :)
Not what I ment. Found
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
>
> What I want to do is just to register port 8009 for AJP protocol. Not to
> register the whole protocol ;-)
If you followed the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED], the point was raised that it's
very
difficult to get your registration accepted when your port selection alre
Blame your provider; we've finally determined that hotmail is eating your
unsubscribe requests - this is specific to hotmail accounts and you are
far from the only one experiencing this problem.
In any case you've been unsubscribed and should receive only one copy of
this note. The current thinki
...at least in 4.1.31...
GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable:
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
Additionally, Redhat 9.0 users should use the same setting, to avoid stability
problems.
This is really, really horrific advice. A comment to for the user to fo
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
> It's not only in the 4.1.31 release, it's even in the latest stable
> 5.5.17. Let's change it in the next releases of 4.x and 5.x, starting
> with 5.5.18 which should happen any day now.
>
> I think the advice was decent (and based on empirical evidence IIRC)
> when or
James Berry wrote:
>
> My response is that the tomcat should be completely blind to
> "parameters". Basically, to Tomcat's perspective, they don't exist.
> There is nothing any more special about "this;biz=bar" than
> "this,biz=bar" or "this-biz-bar".
But, of course, your access control does call
James Berry wrote:
>
>> Because Tomcat and Apache are blind to parameters, the connector -should-
>> reject them. When Tomcat/Apache are able to treat your "this;biz=bar"
>> example the same as "this" for the purpose of access control, then they
>> can be enabled in an opaque manner that lets the
James Berry wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2006, at 2:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> James Berry wrote:
>>>
>>> So maybe this is the crux of it. Why/where is it that "this;biz=bar"
>>> cannot be treated the same for the purposes of access con
Jason Brittain wrote:
>
> Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to
> Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I
> knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I
> since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that
> setting alone to see i
Alpha Huang wrote:
> It has been a long time that mod_jk.dsp has unix line endings (LF) instead of
> win32's CRLF.
>
> I have to fix it every time when I use msdev to build it.
>
> Although many text editors could fix the format, why don't someone clean it
> before upload it as "win32 source"?
Y
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> The binaries are at:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk-1.2.19/
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win64/jk-1.2.19/
>
>
> Note:
> Do not use Apache 1.3.37 binaries
> from http://hunter.campbus.com/
>
On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means
>>> dropping anything bellow IIS5.1
>>
>> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up until Win
>> 2000 including if that's what you plan. Star
On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means
>>> dropping anything bellow IIS5.1
>>
>> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up until Win
>> 2000 including if that's what you plan. Star
On 10/28/2011 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/10/2011 08:15, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means
>&g
On 10/31/2011 2:37 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
> --- tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/pcre/pcre.amd64 (original)
> +++ tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/pcre/pcre.amd64 Mon Oct 31 07:37:07 2011
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ LIB32_OBJS= \
>$(LIB32_FLAGS) $(DEF_FLAGS) $(LIB32_OBJS)
> <<
>
> -CPP_PROJ=-nologo -MD -W3
On 11/15/2011 12:37 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Nov 15 06:37:12 2011
New Revision: 1202058
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1202058&view=rev
Log:
Make sure .bat and .sh files have executable property set
This could be a silly point, but .bat files do not carry a sh
On 1/13/2012 8:30 PM, Brian Burch wrote:
> On 14/01/12 09:45, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> No grudge held :)
>> I'm just bringing it up since very many files have been reformatted for
>> the sake of formatting. And when tracing down a problem, I, and I
>> suspect others too, often use SVN hist
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>
so -win32-x86-native, -win32-x64 and -win32-ia64 would make perfect
sense.
>>> Fine with me.
>>>
>>
>> "32" in "-win32-x64" looks odd.
>>
>
> Right win64-x64 would make more sense.
Irrelevant.
There is no win64, but there could be
Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> So I like the idea of using Id, but I am open to arguments for dropping it.
In httpd, we use; in the reference
file, and the tag which
is updated in order to determine how far out of sync translations have fallen.
So there is one argument for at least one embedded svn pr
> The following page has been changed by JeanFredericClere:
> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatTrackUs09
FYI - I'm having problems groking this, so I presume the general public
will have the same trouble...
> Track Description
>
> + This track will give you all you need to know about the
Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> You have three groups, "general users", "Tomcat users", and "Tomcat
>> Admins".
>> I understand the second two, and have no clue what you mean by
>> "general" :)
>
Henri Gomez wrote:
> The question here is :
>
> Why did we use unixd_set_global_mutex_perms/ap_unixd_set_global_mutex_perms
> since both call didn't exist in i5/OS V6R1 and I had to set
> JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS to 0 to have them excluded.
Because otherwise, root created file locking objects are
Uwe Günther wrote:
> So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing
> to code at all.
>
> So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do.
>
> How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st
> attach the patch to the bug, 2nd..
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems there is a bunch of KEYS file in the
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat and in the web site.
>
> Should we only have one of those?
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/KEYS is really all you need or even
want to maintain.
---
Brane F. Gračnar wrote:
> Hello :)
>
> This patch adds support for X-Forwarded-For (or any other) http request
> header
> holding ip address of real client so that request.getRemoteAddr() return
> correct address if tomcat is running behind apache or any other reverse http
> proxy.
Note you c
On 4/27/2011 1:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ?
>
> Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ?
You mean...
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/carlosag/archive/2010/04/02/setting-up-a-reverse-proxy-using-iis-url-rewrite-and-arr.aspx
?
--
On 5/18/2011 9:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/05/2011 15:06, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2011/5/18 Mark Thomas :
>>> All,
>>>
>>> We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases.
>>> Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync
>>> (every around 2 hou
On 7/27/2011 1:16 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> Well does it make sense to vote for a binary?
IMHO, not as a 'release vote'. Testing it, is great, but testing
isn't the purpose of release voting. Mladen attests he's compiled
from the asf source, then the binary corresponds to the ASF relea
robingandhi21 wrote:
Info regarding FIPS is:The Federal Information Processing Standard 140-1
(FIPS 140-1) and its successor FIPS 140-2 are United States Government
standards that provide a benchmark for implementing cryptographic software.
They specify best practices for implementing crypto alg
Mladen Turk wrote:
OK if you insist.
The *Foundation* insists ;-)
I suppose we can then use the src tarball from the heanet.ie
site (used by the installer BTW) instead dist site.
Or you can remove the file to /dev/dist/, and hold a release vote already?
> Or we can have it inside
> http:/
Mladen Turk wrote:
Because it's native and the one that makes a release needs
some extra prerequisites to build it.
Part of this confusion is that projects never vote on binary
artifacts, they vote on source code releases.
Because the sources land in tags/ and a tarball, I'd strongly
consider
Rainer Jung wrote:
- cleanup and prepare for each of the targets underneath or "release".
Either way, since in the source tgz target there is already an exclude
list, I would prefer to update that exclude list and use the same one
whereever possible, so something like:
FYI - this is all ove
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Requiring any specific order on HTTP response headers is
completely bogus...
:)
To elaborate on why Jim thinks so (and we all agree)...
- it's not spec. You cannot rely on this when authoring a user agent.
- proxies can and will reorder whatever pretty order you assign
Mark Thomas wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I used to get the win32 tcnative at http://tomcat.heanet.ie/native/
but there is only a 1.1.12 there.
Do you know alternate location ?
Nothing I am aware of. That is where they are currently uploaded to.
Also, shouldn't we provide such win32/
The standard is only 7 1/2 years old;
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965
Jim Manico wrote:
According to Daniel Stenberg, Cookies are not even *mentioned* in RFC2616
Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0623.html
"On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Jim Manico wrote:
> Are there any
Although it's a little goofy to f/w this to the tomcat list, it seems this
might clear up your fluxored mod_jk test ;-)
--- Begin Message ---
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Apr 9 01:48:19 2008
New Revision: 646229
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646229&view=rev
Log:
Per httpd/trunk r440337 - "Rep
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Bill,
thanks for this. The problem though is not with the test, but if your
compilation environment does not match your runtime environment. In
Henri's case, and also in the case where we provide binaries, the build
environment contains a newer version of 2.2.x httpd hea
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hmmm, I'm talking only about 2.2. The function ap_get_server_banner()
has been added between 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 with an associated minor MMN
bump. So any module build against 2.2.4 using ap_get_server_banner()
shielded by AP_MODULE_MAGIC_AT_LEAST(20051115,4) will not load into
Tim Funk wrote:
Since there was never a release from trunk - there really isn't a change
log. When trunk is released as a new branch it should have a
RELEASE-NOTES which highlight why its a different branch but maintaining
change log for an unreleased version doesn't make much sense to me.
Hm
Mark Thomas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
New Revision: 680102
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
Log:
Fix RDF as per report on users list
This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care
about this fil
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
New Revision: 680102
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
Log:
Fix RDF as per report on users list
This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of
Mark Thomas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
New Revision: 680102
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
Log:
Fix RDF as per report on users list
This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care
about this fil
Mark Thomas wrote:
Description:
When using a RequestDispatcher the target path was normalised before the
query string was removed. A request that included a specially crafted
request parameter could be used to access content that would otherwise be
protected by a security constraint or by locati
Mark Thomas wrote:
What mitigations are you thinking of?
The description is intended to be sufficient for a user to determine if
they match the vulnerability conditions. And this for this notice I
believe it meets this criteria.
In this case there is no way of configuring yourself away from
Jim Manico wrote:
This is a worthwhile post to read regarding path traversal attacks
against tomcat.
http://www.0x00.com/?i=630
Worthwhile? To note the community frustration against Tomcat parsers?
Must be what you meant since the author adds nothing.
New information is always welcome.
I love the way you phrased this, httpd should steal this for our site :)
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 14 03:07:25 2008
New Revision: 685838
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=685838&view=rev
Log:
Make purpose of security mailing list even clearer. Could now just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Aug 14 11:11:28 2008
New Revision: 685981
FYI, I've updated asf-mailer so it no longer directs commit traffic
to the long-dead [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which means starting at
this commit, you may have to adjust your filters. But reply-to-all
should n
George Sexton wrote:
I guess I'm not understanding how you use the term regression. 5.5.25
for sure did not have this problem.
5.5.26 introduced it, and 5.5.27 has it.
How do you mean regression?
x.y.-1 was free of it and x.y.-0 demonstrated it.
This is x.y.-2 is free of it, x.y.-1 demons
Tim Whittington wrote:
> The bizarre thing is it seems to have built without issue on Linux, HP-UX
> (two archs) and AIX/Power.
That undefined symbols thing is windows specific, most unix compilers building
a lib or module won't complain, so your observation is perfectly normal. But
getting this
Andre-John Mas wrote:
> Just to repeat what I stated in the ticket:
>
> The problem I have with the suggested approach is that it treats UTF-8
> as an
> exception, rather that a norm for my whole application server. I am not
> sure
> that I should be having to be specifying the encoding before han
Hello Experts,
the AC/US planning team has a 1hr gap in the program, of the "Security"
topic track 1 on Thursday 6 November.
http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/schedule/2008/11/06
Please get back to me ASAP if you have (or would like to create) a session
that hits one or more of the bullets belo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sat Nov 15 04:59:01 2008
> New Revision: 714246
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=714246&view=rev
> Log:
> Update KEYS with changes from 6.0.x (Remy updated his key)
> -pub 1024D/41E49465 2006-11-08
> - Key fingerprint = 80FF 76D8 8A
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Mladen Turk wrote:
>> > Hello to the Tomcat team,
>> >
>> > Native 1.1.16 has been available for testing for almost a week,
>> > so I would like to proceed with the release vote.
>> >
>>
>> So far only one binding vote has been recorded
>> (Thanks Hen
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we now have tcnative 1.1.x and trunk. What's our goal w.r.t. API stability?
>
> My understanding was that trunk was created to introduce APR 1.3 and
> that the result would be tcnative 1.2.x.
APR 1.3 is abi compatible to 1.2 - although you famo
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> you don't need to lobby, simply create a patch in Bugzilla
>
> Although it is likely to get ignored / end up as WONTFIX. I don't see
> what the security issue is here. How does an MD5 collisions affect the
> security of the session ID?
The on
Mladen Turk wrote:
The problem with mod_proxy and mod_cluster is the
fact they are targeted for a *single* web server (httpd)
Which varies from a one off poorly defined protocol how, exactly?
They don't have the generic web server API like mod_jk
does, and all of them doesn't support async b
If there's a desire to move ahead with a new connector at the tomcat
project, and the branch/release approach is planned to yield stable
code that will improve from release to release, why even retain the
association to 'jk'? It seems it would benefit the effort if stable
code was released with a
Henri Gomez wrote:
mod_jk is not a 'regular' Apache HTTPd module, since it could be used
with IIS, Domino, iPlanet and got JNI support.
Of course I understand all that.
But why call it after 'jakarta'?
My point is that tomcat/7.0/connectors could use a fresh new name.
--
Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> If i recall the tomcat story (10 years).
> Today
>
> Sun has it's own implementation, Grizzly.
> Jboss forked tc code in it's own implémentation for AS.
> Spring Source embed it in it's DM server.
It's disturbing that you fail to mention Geronimo altogether. If we can't
h
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have been looking at bug 46950 [1]. Everything is fine with the BIO
> connector but with APR the renegotiation fails to trigger a request for
> the user's certificate. I assume that this is because the socket is
> still associated with an SSLContext where the SSLV
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I have been looking at bug 46950 [1]. Everything is fine with the BIO
>> connector but with APR the renegotiation fails to trigger a request for
>> the user's certificate. I assume that
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> There's also a suggested set on the Apache site, see:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
>>
> that's exactly my point, everytime I just onto a new machine, and I
> forget, which I'm bound to do, to set the config
mt...@apache.org wrote:
> +runas /env /savecred /user:%SERVICE_USER% "%COMSPEC% /K \"%SELF%\"
> %SERVICE_CMD% %SERVICE_NAME%"
review your cmd.exe syntax. cmd /k is wrong here, that's to persist
a shell. You meant /c I suspect.
---
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Nevertheless, how about creating separate .zips that
> would contain tomcat(X)w.exe tomcat(X).exe service.bat
> and tcnative-1.dll
> eg.
> apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win32-native.zip
> apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-native.zip
> apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-ia64-native.zip
ia64 != x64, y
On 5/29/2010 8:56 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> As indicated below, I will now be requesting infra close these lists
> with qmail forwards to d...@tomcat.
I've found, in managing a host of httpd and apr related lists, that sending
a final closure message, verifying all *.apache.org references to the
On 7/15/2010 9:44 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
>> raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
>> relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion
On 8/24/2010 3:48 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> I don't remember, but I guess I changed my mind then. Real world usage
> difficulties mean it is very hard to require something newer than APR
> 1.3.
Nonsense, httpd 2.4 (now in beta as 2.3.6) requires APR. Forward looking
releases, e.g. those in t
It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my
commit privileges for the jk module suspended :) But wanted to pass on these
very small proposals;
* mod_jk.dsp should have referred to a project 'named' mod_jk, the 'project
name' should generally match the name of th
On 9/8/2010 12:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 06:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my
>> commit privileges for the jk module suspended :) But wanted to pass on these
>> very small pro
On 9/8/2010 12:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> +1 to everything you suggested to change. If you improve the dsps, you might
> want to take
> a look at
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43303
Yea, I'm happy to add .rc's (VERSION resources) to the binaries, should be
straightfo
On 9/10/2010 12:48 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Fri Sep 10 17:48:15 2010
> New Revision: 995901
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995901&view=rev
> Log:
> Oops. We should really do something with that portable.h
svn rm it. The make files need simple cat portable.h.i
On 9/11/2010 12:23 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 08:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 9/10/2010 12:48 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Fri Sep 10 17:48:15 2010
>>> New Revision: 995901
>>>
>>> URL: ht
On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
With this release, following the retirement of httpd-1.3 from all maintenance,
would this be a good time to declare this the final native/apache-1.3/ c
On 9/13/2010 4:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
>> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
>
> With this release, following the retirement of httpd-1.3 from all main
On 9/13/2010 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> I don't have any problem of freezing the 1.3 support concerning features and
> minor bugs,
> but I find it a bit surprising for users to suddenly stop supporting 1.3. In
> my opinion we
> should still do security fixes when needed and critical bugs. M
On 9/13/2010 6:11 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
> I agree with this approach.
>
> I'd like to get a 1.2.31 release out sometime to release the ISAPI
> Redirector log rotation though, before we start on 1.3.
Just to make sure there is no confusion, I'm speaking of dropping apache-1.3,
prior to 1.2.31
On 9/11/2010 5:03 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> I've been maintaining my own VS 2003 (and now 2005) solution for a while now
> with Apache 2.0/2.2 projects.
Once this is committed, you should be able to load the .dsp into vs.net thru
vs 2010 and convert with minimal issues.
-
On 9/8/2010 12:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> +1 to everything you suggested to change. If you improve the dsps, you might
> want to take
> a look at
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43303
Just worked though jk.rc and it was fairly straight forward, just
adding a JK_DLL_SUF
On 9/13/2010 4:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
>> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
>
> With this release, following the retirement of httpd-1.3 from all main
On 9/14/2010 6:00 AM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Sep 14 11:00:40 2010
> New Revision: 996836
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996836&view=rev
> Log:
> Identify JK_ISAPI for jk_version.h PACKAGE definition
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/Makefile.am
On 9/14/2010 10:10 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> A little bit messy for RM to rename the files once when created,
> but allows to limit the number of directories.
Certainly easier than trying to wring out the version-decorated file names
straight from the build system :)
I'll take a look at other d
On 9/14/2010 5:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.09.2010 01:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 9/13/2010 6:11 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
>>> I agree with this approach.
>>>
>>> I'd like to get a 1.2.31 release out sometime to release the ISAPI
>>&g
101 - 200 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
