Mark Thomas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
New Revision: 680102
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
Log:
Fix RDF as per report on users list
This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care
about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information
that is two years out of date.
For starters, try the attached.
Is part of the flaw that it's not in the xdocs origin tree? Maybe leaving
this in plain site for authoring would make it easier to keep it in sync.
Index: tomcat/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
===================================================================
--- tomcat/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf (revision 680122)
+++ tomcat/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf (working copy)
@@ -30,23 +30,23 @@
</maintainer>
<release>
<Version>
- <name>Latest Stable Release</name>
- <created>2006-04-14</created>
- <revision>5.5.17</revision>
+ <name>Current Stable Release 6.0.18</name>
+ <created>2008-07-22</created>
+ <revision>6.0.18</revision>
</Version>
</release>
<release>
<Version>
- <name>5.5.16</name>
- <created>2006-03-05</created>
- <revision>5.5.16</revision>
+ <name>Current Legacy Release 5.5.26</name>
+ <created>2008-01-28</created>
+ <revision>5.5.26</revision>
</Version>
</release>
<release>
<Version>
- <name>5.5.15</name>
- <created>2006-01-23</created>
- <revision>5.5.15</revision>
+ <name>Current Legacy Release 4.1.37</name>
+ <created>2008-02-12</created>
+ <revision>4.1.37</revision>
</Version>
</release>
<repository>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
