George Sexton wrote:
I guess I'm not understanding how you use the term regression. 5.5.25
for sure did not have this problem.
5.5.26 introduced it, and 5.5.27 has it.
How do you mean regression?
x.y.-1 was free of it and x.y.-0 demonstrated it.
This is x.y.-2 is free of it, x.y.-1 demonstrated it, and x.y.-0 still
has it. From the perspective of a release manager, this is no reason
to stop the release. It's certainly a good idea to do *another* release
in the near future to address it, but not to keep the fixes between
5.5.26 and 5.5.27 out of users' hands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
