[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sat Nov 15 04:59:01 2008
> New Revision: 714246
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=714246&view=rev
> Log:
> Update KEYS with changes from 6.0.x (Remy updated his key)

> -pub   1024D/41E49465 2006-11-08
> -      Key fingerprint = 80FF 76D8 8A96 9FE4 6108  558A 80B9 53A0 41E4 9465
> -uid                  Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -sig 3        41E49465 2006-11-08  Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -sub   4096g/D07A28EB 2006-11-08
> -sig          41E49465 2006-11-08  Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +pub   1024D/288584E7 2008-07-02
> +uid                  Rémy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +sub   4096g/4B6FAEFB 2008-07-02

Hmmm... if anything is signed with 41E49465 or its subkeys, that key should
not be pulled from KEYS.  Adding a new key is sufficient.

If he has revoked key 41E49465, files signed in http://archive.apache.org/
are now suspect and must be pulled down, and re-signed.  Quite a PITA.

Hopefully 41E49465 is not comprimized and could still sign 2288584E7 as
its descendant (full-trust), which solves the problem of the limited #
of signatures on a brand new key.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to