svn commit: r586293 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: rjung Date: Fri Oct 19 00:28:50 2007 New Revision: 586293 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586293&view=rev Log: Cast a vote. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586293&r1=5

svn commit: r586292 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

Author: rjung Date: Fri Oct 19 00:28:01 2007 New Revision: 586292 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586292&view=rev Log: Add svn properties for substitution. Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS (contents, props changed) Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apach

svn commit: r586291 - /tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS

Author: rjung Date: Fri Oct 19 00:27:15 2007 New Revision: 586291 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586291&view=rev Log: Fix EOL and set svn properties. No content change. Modified: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS (contents, props changed) Modified: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS URL: ht

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r586481 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Oct 19 07:35:28 2007 New Revision: 586481 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586481&view=rev Log: update changelog Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43643] - Setting the executor attribute in a connector that does not support the executor attribute causes a

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP/1.1 100 Continue response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Hey, On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it. Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything. I'm +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43663] New: - maxPostSize does not work in standard http connector implementation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Hey, On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of > proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned > before which is hosting it. I don't think that's a problem, and I don't think it has to be hosted in the

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the > > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing an

Re: [LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

-0 The setProperty was done way before JMX, and it's quite hacky. I think standardising on JMX-like model is better - i.e. if we make changes to setProperty and connector configuration, it should bring it closer to JMX. In JMX we have a "void setAttribute(...) throws AttributeNotFound", plus a m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43530] - Bad links on Apache Tomcat 6.0 Documentation Index

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Hi Yoav, > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it. > Speaking only for myself, I don't see how wai

Re: [LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

For java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java Is it me or does this look odd after the patch (as well as before) ... public void setProperty(String name, String value) { setAttribute(name, value); if (/*omitted for word wrap since it doesn't matter */) { return ep.setPr

svn commit: r586522 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: remm Date: Fri Oct 19 09:32:52 2007 New Revision: 586522 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586522&view=rev Log: - Propose a shell script update v2 (but it's better to ignore it, JF told me he would do something better later). Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tom

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

John, On 10/18/07, jkew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul, > I agree with Costin. > -1 to default Default is out of the question. > +1 to alternative I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it. > > Some points: > > 1. I

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

William, FYI - I love Gentoo. On 10/18/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gentoo's vote -1 for Tomcat using Maven to build instead of Ant :) > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 23:26 -0700, Bill Barker wrote: > > I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one. I have no object

Re: [LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

For what it's worth :) +1 On 10/19/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary > of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing > behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to

[LOBBYING] Add nio connector to configuration validation

Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to the validation of server.xml attributes. It'd be nice to get one more vote, so that we can g

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

+1 Great! peter Am 19.10.2007 um 01:34 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, I would like to propose that we have reached the time where Tomcat 5.0.x should be archived. What this means in practice is: - Sending an announcement out that no further work, including security patches will be performed on

Re: svn commit: r586444 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Hi Filip, can you please add your last changes also to the changelog.xml? Regards Peter Am 19.10.2007 um 15:35 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Author: fhanik Date: Fri Oct 19 06:35:38 2007 New Revision: 586444 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586444&view=rev Log: update status file Modifi

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Bill, The last thing that I want to be responsible for is introducing a stumbling block for all of the Tomcat developers and users. This thread should have also included "Maven 2 - Migrate, Integrate, or Annihilate". On 10/18/07, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty much going to

svn commit: r586444 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Oct 19 06:35:38 2007 New Revision: 586444 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586444&view=rev Log: update status file Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=5864

svn commit: r586443 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven: mvn-pub.xml mvn.properties.default

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Oct 19 06:35:18 2007 New Revision: 586443 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586443&view=rev Log: Add a ANT script that can sign and publish to the central ASF maven repo Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn.pr

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "PoweredBy" by ChristophePierret

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by ChristophePierret: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy -- http:/

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/18/07, Mary Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > i have been a passive listener all the while but i feel its time for change. > I vote for Maven > regards, > Mary Thank you, Mary. However, I believe we are out-numbered. :) -

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/18/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes! > > I can't see that maven build is better choice. > > Peter > > Vote -1 for build with maven! What if Maven 2 is added in co-existence, instead of as a replacement? -

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/17/07, Konstantin Kolinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Paul! > You may start playing in some sandbox, creating a directory structure > there, and pulling branches of tomcat code through the use of > svn:externals property. It is called creating a view. Thanks Konstantin, I agree with t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

+1 -Tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of > proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned > before which is hosting it. The place that comes immediately to mind is wush.net... maybe ping Michael Ching a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP/1.1 100 Continue response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r586571 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: funkman Date: Fri Oct 19 11:30:30 2007 New Revision: 586571 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586571&view=rev Log: +1 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586571&r1=586570&r2

svn commit: r586384 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: markt Date: Fri Oct 19 04:39:51 2007 New Revision: 586384 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586384&view=rev Log: Change my vote after patch revision Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

"Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Yoav, >> >> > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > I'm going to keep