On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the > > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it. > > > Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything. I'm > > +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working > > Maven build. I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see > > its implementation. It's just like most other issues or enhancement > > requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in > > the pudding, so to speak. > > If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of > proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned > before which is hosting it. I had originally mentioned the idea of > opening a branch for it. However, I don't have commit access to the > ASF repository, yet, and I felt too new to be asking for it. Since I > have made everyone aware that I would do the work, and the > overwhelming consensus seems to be "integrate-instead-of-migrate", I'm > ready to start prototyping in my spare time. Would you grant me > access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good > pudding?
Given that the reaction's been pretty negative from those that have commit access[1] I wouldn't hold out much hope on this. [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/whoweare.html Niall > > And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past > > couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent. > > Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
