Hi Yoav, > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it. > Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything. I'm > +0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and showing us a working > Maven build. I'm -0 to committing to a build system idea before I see > its implementation. It's just like most other issues or enhancement > requests: I'm always open to new ideas but I want to see the proof in > the pudding, so to speak. If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned before which is hosting it. I had originally mentioned the idea of opening a branch for it. However, I don't have commit access to the ASF repository, yet, and I felt too new to be asking for it. Since I have made everyone aware that I would do the work, and the overwhelming consensus seems to be "integrate-instead-of-migrate", I'm ready to start prototyping in my spare time. Would you grant me access to commit the finished prototype if turns out to be good pudding? > And that's coming from someone who used Maven for his day job the past > couple of years, so is not a Maven opponent. Since you use it regularly, how do you personally feel about it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
