On 01/15/2010 05:21 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Also the tar produced by ant doesn't look at all
like the one produced by gtar.
Think the problem is that we should add all files
at once during the build since it looks the tar has
multiple header sections or something.
I never had problems extracti
On 15.01.2010 16:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
Although some platforms have broken(limited) default tar.
Dunno if we are using very long paths that would break tar
on Solaris (eg. +100 character path names)
Yes, src, bin and fulldocs tarballs include longer path names then 100
chars.
OTOH even the
On 15/01/2010 15:56, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 15/01/2010 15:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
>>
On 01/15/2010 08:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/01/2010 15:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
Just to update
On 01/15/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/01/2010 15:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
Just to update.
Since beginning
On 15/01/2010 15:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
>> package-deployer-zip too).
>>
>
> Just to update.
> Since beginning of time httpd has x.x-win3
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
Just to update.
Since beginning of time httpd has x.x-win32-src.zip
We could have something like that as well instea
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
New Revision: 899395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395&view=rev
Log:
zip is for non-windows platforms
Hmmm, really?
Until recently we didn't have th
On 15/01/2010 14:41, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
>> New Revision: 899395
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395&view=rev
>> Log:
>> zip is for non-windows platforms
>
> Hmmm, really?
I believe so
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
New Revision: 899395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395&view=rev
Log:
zip is for non-windows platforms
Hmmm, really?
Until recently we didn't have the individual binary release zips for
Window
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
New Revision: 899395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395&view=rev
Log:
zip is for non-windows platforms
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/dist.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/dist.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/dist.xml?rev=899395&r1
11 matches
Mail list logo
