On 01/15/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/01/2010 15:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
Just to update.
Since beginning of time httpd has x.x-win32-src.zip
We could have something like that as well instead relaying
on arch extension for CRLF type.
Something to think about for Tomcat 7.
Sure.
Anyhow, I might just gave +1 prematurely on Rainer's
.zip == CRLF presumption.
I see 6.0.20 has LF line endings in src.zip, so IMO
we should stick with that. Other would mean a sudden surprise
to the end users.
Cheers
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
