On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
New Revision: 899395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395&view=rev
Log:
zip is for non-windows platforms
Hmmm, really?
Until recently we didn't have the individual binary release zips for
Windows, they are new. Previously the zip was for DOS/Windows.
If we encode the package-zip now for Unix, don't we create confusion
w.r.t. package-src-zip (DOS) and package-deployer-zip (undefined until
now)?
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
+1
Although some platforms have broken(limited) default tar.
Dunno if we are using very long paths that would break tar
on Solaris (eg. +100 character path names)
Also the tar produced by ant doesn't look at all
like the one produced by gtar.
Think the problem is that we should add all files
at once during the build since it looks the tar has
multiple header sections or something.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
