[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

It's past the announced deadline and we have enough votes to close the voting. Voting status == +1: 7 binding votes, 2 non-binding votes * Dave Barnes (PMC member) * Anthony Baker (PMC Member) * Jinmei Liao (PMC member) * Jacob Barrett (PMC member) * Dan Smith (PMC member) * Udo Kohlmeyer

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

My build.gradle is pretty simple: repositories { mavenCentral() maven { url 'https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1059' } } dependencies { compile('org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter') compile 'org.apache.geode:geode-core:1.10.0' compile 'org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

> On Sep 25, 2019, at 12:26 PM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > ⚠️ to run my spring boot client for above test, I had to manually add compile > 'io.micrometer:micrometer-core:1.2.0' , otherwise local region creation blows > up with “java.lang.NoSuchMethodError” due to spring-boot-starter pulling in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+0 ✅ verified that apache-geode-native-1.10.0-src.tar.gz extracts with a versioned top-level directory ✅ set up a small cluster (2 locators, 3 servers, 1 client, ssl enabled) and ran some simple puts, gets, and CQ. ⚠️ I cannot give “+1" yet because the release notes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

I'm going to change my vote to "+1". This is an issue that needs to be resolved. I would have preferred 1.10, but maybe it is good enough to have it fixed in 1.11. @Robert, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7241 is the JIRA you were looking for. We definitely have to fix this issu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

Hi there Robert, Whilst it is not a new issue (for 1.10), but missing something this critical is an automatic -1, in my books. It has been a problem since 1.8 and we've just missed it, otherwise 1.8 onwards should have been rejected. There is not a JIRA, as I have not yet received a positive

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

Udo, is there a Jira about this issue? Since this is not a new issue in 1.10 (as you say, it is the case in 1.8, 1.9, 1.9.1) is it really a -1 ? On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:01 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > Given that 1.8, 1.9 are currently publishing the jar's to the maven > central, instead of wars,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

Given that 1.8, 1.9 are currently publishing the jar's to the maven central, instead of wars, I can only assume that 1.10 would do the same. Also, given that everyone is surprised by this, means that we have not address this issue. Until we can confirm that we would publish war files instead

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 - Built from source and ran unit tests - Used GFSH to create a locator and server and do some puts/gets - Checked version in GFSH - Built and ran all of the examples - Verified SHAs and signatures The luceneSpatial project in geode-examples fails for me when running... > To add

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 Ran geode-release-check (checks signatures, source build, simple gfsh test) -Dan On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:20 PM Jacob Barrett wrote: > +1 > > Still think it is ok to ship but found another annoying issue. When > running Geode Native C++ integration tests (new framework) an indented > disab

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 Still think it is ok to ship but found another annoying issue. When running Geode Native C++ integration tests (new framework) an indented disabled test will execute and fail. The test was not properly disabled. On the develop branch this test is fixed and is no longer disabled. If there is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 Only tested geode-native on MacOS. Unit and integration tests based. One issues worth mentioning, while we don’t explicitly state support for specific platforms, MacOs with the latest Xcode will have some troubles getting off the ground. The updated Clang compiler in Xcode is less forgiving

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 verified the management v2 apis are available. On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:58 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > > Reviewed: > > - Signatures and hashes > - LICENSE and NOTICE > - No binaries in source distribution > - Builds from source > > > Quibbles: > > - Let’s include geode-benchmarks/ next

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

It worked for me…? > On Sep 23, 2019, at 12:38 PM, Aaron Lindsey wrote: > > Does this happen for anyone else?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 Reviewed: - Signatures and hashes - LICENSE and NOTICE - No binaries in source distribution - Builds from source Quibbles: - Let’s include geode-benchmarks/ next release - It would be more awesome if geode-native extracts into a directory with a versioned name (e.g. apache-geode-native-1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

The luceneSpatial project in geode-examples fails for me when running: ./gradlew -PgeodeReleaseUrl= https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.10.0.RC2 -PgeodeRepositoryUrl= https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1059 :luceneSpatial:build :luceneSpatial:runAll In th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

+1 I downloaded the 1.10.0 RC2 Apache Geode release candidate, and also the Geode Native Client source bundle. Successfully built the user guides and API docs in both repos and spot-checked the contents for correct version strings and paths. On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:26 AM Dick Cavender wrote: >

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.10.0.RC2

Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.10.0.RC2. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! Please do a review and give your feedback including the checks performed. The voting deadline is *3PM PST Wed, September 25 201