I had a corrupt .desktop file in /usr/share/applications, removing it
and running update-desktop-database fixed the problem and I was able
to finish installing the limbo packages. A developer has fixed the
problem in desktop-file-utils and a patch is ready , per the forwarded
message below, for the
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 17:51:29 -0500, Zach wrote:
> Florian wrote:
[...]
> >I saw that you filed a bug report (#460532). There seem to be two
> >related older reports (#406709, #396439). In one case the submitter
> >states in a follow-up that a corrupted .desktop file was to blame, but
> >the g
Florian wrote:
>The command itself seems to use only about 2.6 seconds of CPU time
>(user+sys) and spends the rest of the 1m19s waiting for something, most
>probably data transfer from the hard drive. You see the CPU at 90-100%
>during the whole time, so maybe DMA is not working. You can use "hdpa
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 21:27:31 -0500, Zach wrote:
> Florian wrote:
[...]
> >Make sure that you have the correct version of libglib2.0-0 installed.
> >On an up-to-date Lenny system "dpkg -l libglib2.0-0" should show version
> >2.14.3-1. Most likely you will find that you have the current version
Florian wrote:
> I am running Debian testing with 2.6.18 kernel and ALSA sound. Any fix
> for these likely to be available soon? I've been doing an update every
> day and still see these errors. Something broken in Gnome it seems
> related to the audio.
Please clarify this last point if you want h
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 16:47:03 -0500, Zach wrote:
> I am running Debian testing with 2.6.18 kernel and ALSA sound. Any fix
> for these likely to be available soon? I've been doing an update every
> day and still see these errors. Something broken in Gnome it seems
> related to the audio.
Please
I am running Debian testing with 2.6.18 kernel and ALSA sound. Any fix
for these likely to be available soon? I've been doing an update every
day and still see these errors. Something broken in Gnome it seems
related to the audio.
Zach
netrek:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
I had similar problems with fonts. It turned out that
since I didn't initially do an dist-upgrade to woody,
and probably since I was running X and apt-get from a
virtual tty, that some parts of Xfree86 3.x were
installed along with the 4.x fonts. The 3.x Xserver
was in some instances confused by th
Hall Stevenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> * Pollywog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010922 15:14]:
> > I have the following xfonts packages installed, but when I upgrade Woody
> > and these packages get upgraded, I lose fonts in my Gnome themes, the
> > Gnome panel, and in Evolution. Ins
* Pollywog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010922 15:14]:
> I have the following xfonts packages installed, but when I upgrade Woody
> and these packages get upgraded, I lose fonts in my Gnome themes, the
> Gnome panel, and in Evolution. Instead of characters, I see tiny blocks
> consisting of dots.
>
> hi
I have the following xfonts packages installed, but when I upgrade Woody
and these packages get upgraded, I lose fonts in my Gnome themes, the
Gnome panel, and in Evolution. Instead of characters, I see tiny blocks
consisting of dots.
hi xfonts-100dpi 4.0.3-4100 dpi fonts for X
hi xfon
In article "Felix E. Klee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies! I found out what the problem was: my card is
> not supported by the HISAX drivers in the kernel because it is an AVM
> Fritz! card v2.0 (I didn't suppose the version number makes such a big
> difference). After inst
In article "Felix E. Klee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I do /etc/init.d/isdnutils restart (after configuring everything
> properly(?)) on my Debian 2.2r2 System with Kernel 2.4 packages (from
> the Bunk kernel 2.4 distro), I get the following error messages:
> Restarting isdn services :/
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Tony Crawford wrote:
> Well, at the time I upgraded to kernel 2.4.2, I used the
> packages from Adrian Bunk's 2.4.x-on-potato page, which said the
> ISDNutils were not ready. So I kept the ones I had, and they
> worked OK--at least, ipppd did. Sorry, tha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tony Crawford"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of ISDN card is it BTW?
My card is an AVM Fritz!PCI.
Felix
Willi Dyck wrote (on 22 Apr 2001, at 13:37):
> > CONFIG_ISDN_PPP and friends in the .config file as opposed to=20
> > CONFIG_PPP.
>
> Yes of course!
OK, sorry.
Well, at the time I upgraded to kernel 2.4.2, I used the
packages from Adrian Bunk's 2.4.x-on-potato page, which said the
ISDNutils
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:10:17PM +0100, Tony Crawford wrote:
>
> Sorry if you're an old hand and I'm way off base with this
> question, but you're sure you checked the PPP option *in the
> ISDN section* of the kernel configuration? That's
> CONFIG_ISDN_PPP and friends in the .config file as
Willi Dyck wrote (on 21 Apr 2001, at 19:45):
> > when I do /etc/init.d/isdnutils restart (after configuring everything
> > properly(?)) on my Debian 2.2r2 System with Kernel 2.4 packages (from
> > the
> > Bunk kernel 2.4 distro), I get the following error messages:
> > Restarting isdn service
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ramin Motakef"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess you need newer isdnutils, see Documentation/Changes in the
> Kernel Sources:
>
> Current Minimal Requirements
>
>
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ramin Motakef"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess you need newer isdnutils, see Documentation/Changes in the
> Kernel Sources:
>
> Current Minimal Requirements
>
>
>
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Felix E. Klee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I do /etc/init.d/isdnutils restart (after configuring everything
> properly(?)) on my Debian 2.2r2 System with Kernel 2.4 packages (from
> the
> Bunk kernel 2.4 distro), I get the following error messages:
> Restart
"Felix E. Klee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> when I do /etc/init.d/isdnutils restart (after configuring everything
> properly(?)) on my Debian 2.2r2 System with Kernel 2.4 packages (from
> the
> Bunk kernel 2.4 distro), I get the following error messages:
> Restarting isdn services
Hi,
when I do /etc/init.d/isdnutils restart (after configuring everything
properly(?)) on my Debian 2.2r2 System with Kernel 2.4 packages (from
the
Bunk kernel 2.4 distro), I get the following error messages:
Restarting isdn services :/dev/isdnctrl: No such device
Sorry - this system lack
I noticed during my dist-upgrade tonight that freetype was being kept
back, which is most likely because it has some missing dependancies.
-Rob
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 01:03:50PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Bostjan Muller wrote:
> >> I have noticed that
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bostjan Muller wrote:
>> I have noticed that I cannot update freetype2 package on Debian woody
>> (testing), and libguile6 also:
[...]
>> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> freetype2: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.1) but 2.2-11 is to be
> I have noticed that I cannot update freetype2 package on Debian woody
> (testing), and libguile6 also:
> sudo apt-get install freetype2 ghostview gs gv mgp pstoedi
> t vflib2
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean t
Hi!
I have noticed that I cannot update freetype2 package on Debian woody
(testing), and libguile6 also:
sudo apt-get install freetype2 ghostview gs gv mgp pstoedi
t vflib2
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you h
John Hasler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing
> > distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I
> > have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is
> > really wrong.
>
> You wouldn'
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:50:08PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You wouldn't have these problems if you would ignore the damn code names
> > and track the appropriate distribution. If you want to track unstable
> > point to unstable, not woody.
> >
> > _Don't_ _use_ _code_ _names_.
>
> Bu
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:39:15PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You contradict yourself - if you were tracking woody you were tracking
> > unstable. Since you were tracking unstable before I don't see why
> > it's such a big deal to track it now ...
>
> Maybe it's not worth a discussion, b
debuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DU> So will testing always be available? I like the idea. I'm just not
DU> used to packages being rolled back in a release. But if I have
DU> apt-get always looking at testing, maybe that's what will make me
DU> happy.
To my knowledge:
-- Testing will always b
> You wouldn't have these problems if you would ignore the damn code names
> and track the appropriate distribution. If you want to track unstable
> point to unstable, not woody.
>
> _Don't_ _use_ _code_ _names_.
But I did not want to track unstable, I wanted to track woody. That is, I
didn't wa
> You contradict yourself - if you were tracking woody you were tracking
> unstable. Since you were tracking unstable before I don't see why
> it's such a big deal to track it now ...
Maybe it's not worth a discussion, but when I started using woody before,
the stability of this machine was much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing
> distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I
> have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is
> really wrong.
You wouldn't have these problems if you would
On 12-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing
> distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I
> have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is
> really wrong. So now that X has been removed
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:58:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing
> distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I
> have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is
> really wrong. So no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing
> distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I
> have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is
> really wrong.
When they implemented testing, they started
Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing
distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I
have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is
really wrong. So now that X has been removed from Woody, I must either
roll back to X3 also, o
On 12-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to install lesstif-dev on my woody (testing) box. It says it
> depends on xlib6g-dev but xlib6g-dev conflicts with xlibs which is already
> installed and is required by other packages. I don't see an xlibs-dev
> either. Where are the development
I'm trying to install lesstif-dev on my woody (testing) box. It says it
depends on xlib6g-dev but xlib6g-dev conflicts with xlibs which is already
installed and is required by other packages. I don't see an xlibs-dev
either. Where are the development packages for X (4.01) in woody now? Do
they exis
I need an obj file called libGL.so.1. xmms is nagging me abt it. I know that
it is part of the mesa3 packages but I can't seem to download any of them.
mesa3-glide (which is pretty much useless to me since its for 3dfx based
cards?), mesa3 or mesa3+ggi. cannot be downloaded. broken packages or m
I just uploaded emusic_0.8-5 to incoming.
emusic (0.8-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Recompiled against GTK+ 1.2
* Consolidated into one package
* This WILL not install cleanly through dselect. Remove all your
emusic packages first (this is because dpkg cannot do versioned
42 matches
Mail list logo
