[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing > distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I > have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is > really wrong.
You wouldn't have these problems if you would ignore the damn code names and track the appropriate distribution. If you want to track unstable point to unstable, not woody. _Don't_ _use_ _code_ _names_. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin
