[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Uggh, they removed X4 from Woody? I'm not sure I like this testing > distribution thing. If I'm pointing at woody the whole time (which I > have), I don't expect packages to be rolled back unless something is > really wrong.
When they implemented testing, they started with potato packages and applied the new unstable->testing criteria to move unstable packages into testing. So at some point woody cease to be unstable and started being testing. > I don't want to > move to unstable completely, as this workstation cannot afford any > downtime. Well, you used to track unstable completely if you were tracking woody before testing came out! Wait a bit and woody will catch up to what you have.
