Ouch! both the two replies I made yesterday on this list were too rough
and I should have read the original posts more carefully.
Sorry for that and not being able to propose a solution :-)
Hi Didier,
Thanks for your answer.
14 avr. 2021, 20:50 de didier.gau...@gmail.com:
> So it seems to me appropriate that dd is used as you want an image of a whole
> disk?
>
Whole disk here doesn't mean 1 image file.
Actually, after running clonezilla I get numerous files:
nvme0n1p1.vfat-ptcl-
Hello,
Disclaimer: I have never used Clonezilla nor LUKS
"Many File systems are supported: (1) ext2, ext3, ext4, reiserfs,
reiser4, xfs, jfs, btrfs, f2fs and nilfs2 of GNU/Linux, (2) FAT12,
FAT16, FAT32, NTFS of MS Windows, (3) HFS+ of Mac OS, (4) UFS of
FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD, (5)
Hi,
Do some of you use clonezilla for your backups, especially with a LVM2/LUKS
configuration please?
I've written some days ago to the clonezilla-live mailing-list but I'm not sure
I'll ever get answers considering the very very low traffic on it. So maybe
I'll be mor
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:19:03 +0100
Marco Möller wrote:
> Obviously, the in Step 2 entered (wrong) password (for "A") is stored
> and without further interactive consultation automatically used as
> the input for the password authentication of "B".
> Is this a bug or a feature? If it is a bug, wh
Two volume groups (lvm2) exists, Each of them is encrypted and thus
protected by its own password. Lets call the volume groups and their
corresponding passwords like this:
VGpassword
"A" "pwA"
"B" "pwB"
"pwA" and "pwB" dif
eb
/media/cdrom0/pool/main/c/cryptsetup/libcryptsetup4-udeb_1.7.3-4_amd64.udeb
/media/cdrom0/pool/main/l/linux/crypto-dm-modules-4.9.0-6-amd64-di_4.9.82-1+deb9u3_amd64.udeb
/media/cdrom0/pool/main/l/linux/crypto-modules-4.9.0-6-amd64-di_4.9.82-1+deb9u3_amd64.udeb
/media/cdrom0/pool/main/l/
Sorry, I just meant to send the one liner on the subject. lbrtchx
On 8/12/20, Albretch Mueller wrote:
>> I recommend to thoroughly test your hardware using different OS (possibly
>> non-Linux) and if you manage to reproduce the problems, it would mean a
>> hardware failure.
>
> The only thing that I have "discovered" is that for whatever reason
> that keyboard
Hi,
I run Debian 10 (UEFI with Secure Boot) on multiple LVM2 partitions inside LUKS
as follows:
NAME FSTYPE LABEL
MOUNTPOINT SIZE
nvme0n1
Elimar Riesebieter kirjoitti 27.3.2016 14:23:
* Jari Fredriksson [2016-03-27 14:02 +0300]:
arian kirjoitti 17.3.2016 17:50:
>raspbian is not mainline debian. Maybe ask on raspbian support channels?
>
>>vgchange -a y
>>service lvm2 start
>>mount -a
>
>why the serv
* Jari Fredriksson [2016-03-27 14:02 +0300]:
> arian kirjoitti 17.3.2016 17:50:
> >raspbian is not mainline debian. Maybe ask on raspbian support channels?
> >
> >>vgchange -a y
> >>service lvm2 start
> >>mount -a
> >
> >why the service lvm2
arian kirjoitti 17.3.2016 17:50:
raspbian is not mainline debian. Maybe ask on raspbian support
channels?
vgchange -a y
service lvm2 start
mount -a
why the service lvm2 start? is lvm service disabled?
please provide output of those commands.
Every time after a reboot the boot sequence
arian kirjoitti 17.3.2016 17:50:
raspbian is not mainline debian. Maybe ask on raspbian support channels?
vgchange -a y
service lvm2 start
mount -a
why the service lvm2 start? is lvm service disabled?
please provide output of those commands.
Every time after a reboot the boot sequence aborts
raspbian is not mainline debian. Maybe ask on raspbian support channels?
> vgchange -a y
> service lvm2 start
> mount -a
why the service lvm2 start? is lvm service disabled?
please provide output of those commands.
> Every time after a reboot the boot sequence aborts and sshd is n
I have an USB connected hard disk on my raspberry, and that is used via
lvm2.
This worked as charm in wheezy, but after I upgraded to jessie it does
not work. Every time after a reboot the boot sequence aborts and sshd is
not up (maybe because the /home is an lvm2-partition...) and I have
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:19:40PM -0300, Luther Blissett wrote:
> My initial guess was that it should be possible to extend this
> encryption scheme to the new hard disk using standard lvm tools and the
> unencrypted "open" disk as physical volume to the already existing
> volume group. However, a
Hello folks,
So I might better ask before attempting something stupid. I need to add
a new hard drive to an encrypted debian box. The encryption scheme was
set using debian installer defaults which resulted in just /dev/sda1
-> /boot outside block device encryption. Everything else is encrypted
an
Hello folks,
So I might better ask before attempting something stupid. I need to add
a new hard drive to an encrypted debian box. The encryption scheme was
set using debian installer defaults which resulted in just /dev/sda1
-> /boot outside block device encryption. Everything else is encrypted
an
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> I agree Bob. I was just suprised at how much space 5-6GB is eaten up
> by the overhead. I have several 8G USB drives and remember using 5
> 1/4 inch drives. To throw away 5 gb
Yes, but... You shouldn't think of it that way.
> even though it is only 1.42% of the drive as fo
On 17:31 Thu 14 Feb , Bob Proulx wrote:
> Times change so this info may be out of date with the newer
> filesystems but at one time journal filesystems needed filesystem
> space for the journal and also space needs to be allocated for the
> inodes. (See 'df -i' output.) I assume LVM will need
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi I am trying to backup a volume which has size 347G. So I thought
> ...
> only shows 343G instead of 348G.
> ...
> So my question is where have those extra 5G gone to?
Times change so this info may be out of date with the newer
filesystems but at one time journal filesyste
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> On 20:34 Thu 14 Feb, emmanuel segura wrote:
>>
>> man tune2fs
>>
>> -r reserved-blocks-count
>> Set the number of reserved filesystem blocks.
>>
>> be careful with filesystem reserved block, one time i had a production
>>
On 20:34 Thu 14 Feb , emmanuel segura wrote:
> man tune2fs
>
> -r reserved-blocks-count
> Set the number of reserved filesystem blocks.
>
> be careful with filesystem reserved block, one time i had a production
> server with / corrupted
>
I have a very specific use here.
. So I thought to use
> lvm2.
> So I created a volumeby
>
> lvcreate -n test --size 348G my-volume
>
> I thought I would be giving myself an extra Gigabyte there :).
>
> then i did
> mkfs.ext3 -m0 /dev/my-volume/test
>
> then when I mounted the device
> mount /dev
Hi I am trying to backup a volume which has size 347G. So I thought to use lvm2.
So I created a volumeby
lvcreate -n test --size 348G my-volume
I thought I would be giving myself an extra Gigabyte there :).
then i did
mkfs.ext3 -m0 /dev/my-volume/test
then when I mounted the device
mount /dev
I'm about to partition twin 3TB disks. Some free space (in case I need
it someday) outside the main partitions, and one main partition on each
of the two drives. These partitions will be twinned as parts of a RAID1
for redundancy. On that RAID I plan to install LVM2, and use that to
r how
to alleviate this issue:
The block devices are stacked as follows:
sda1 -> boot
sda2 -> crypto (passphrase) -> lvm2
sdb1 -> crypto (keyfile on sda2 lvm volume) -> lvm2
sdc1 -> crypto (keyfile on sda2 lvm volume) -> lvm2
...
This requires that services be (roughly)
r how
to alleviate this issue:
The block devices are stacked as follows:
sda1 -> boot
sda2 -> crypto (passphrase) -> lvm2
sdb1 -> crypto (keyfile on sda2 lvm volume) -> lvm2
sdc1 -> crypto (keyfile on sda2 lvm volume) -> lvm2
...
This requires that services be (roughly)
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:37:12AM +0200, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> Is there any GUI available in debian/ubuntu for LVM2 ?
wajig (or apt-cache) search lvm shows on my system inter alia:
system-config-lvm - utility for graphically configuring Logical Volumes>
On 22/03/12 10:37, J. Bakshi wrote:
Dear list,
Is there any GUI available in debian/ubuntu for LVM2 ?
Thanks
thanks to redhat guys!
system-config-lvm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:53:12 -0500
"Christofer C. Bell" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> >
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Is there any GUI available in debian/ubuntu for LVM2 ?
>
> Yes, you can install the syste
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> Is there any GUI available in debian/ubuntu for LVM2 ?
Yes, you can install the system-config-lvm package. Here are the details:
Package: system-config-lvm
Status: install ok installed
Priority: extra
Section: adm
Dear list,
Is there any GUI available in debian/ubuntu for LVM2 ?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120322150712.47951...@shiva.selfip.org
Jimmy Wu wrote:
> Since /var is a LVM2 logical volume, it won't get mounted until after
> mountall.sh (I assume). Since cryptdisks comes before mountall.sh in the
> dependency chain I (also assume that I) can't move it after mountall.sh
> without creating some circular me
at the boot order dependencies. After
reading a bit of insserv(8), looking at the LSB headers and
/etc/init.d/.depend.boot info for mountall.sh, cryptdisks, etc., I came
up with the following dependency chain ('a -> b' := a depends on b, so
b starts before a and a stops before
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, 00:59-0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
> So... I am curious. I often read that people are wanting to
> "configure their runlevels". You are not the only one. Other people
> talk about it too. But I never know why. And I never quite know
> exactly what someone me
Jimmy Wu wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed email and the advice about service vs
> invoke-rc.d - I should probably spend more time figuring out what the
The win for package postinst scripts using invoke-rc to start services
is that if they are installed in a chroot then maybe they shouldn't
start
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, 14:09-0600,
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jimmy Wu wrote:
> > I even put aside my reservations about messing with the links in
> > rc.d,
>
> Squeeze is running a dependency based boot scheme controlled by
> insserv. You may be fighting it and not knowing it. Normally you
> would hav
Jimmy Wu wrote:
> I even put aside my reservations about messing with the links in
> rc.d,
Squeeze is running a dependency based boot scheme controlled by
insserv. You may be fighting it and not knowing it. Normally you
would have LSB dependency headers in the /etc/init.d/ scripts and
insserv wi
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, 10:18-0400, Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
> Since no-one replied yet...
>
> I don't have an answer, only ideas.
>
> IIRC, scripts in only one of the rc?.d are executed on startup.
> Which one depend on the requested runlevel, default value being
> specified in /etc/inittab.
>
> L
Since no-one replied yet...
I don't have an answer, only ideas.
IIRC, scripts in only one of the rc?.d are executed on startup. Which
one depend on the requested runlevel, default value being specified in
/etc/inittab.
Looking at my cryptdisks and cryptdisks-early scripts, they appear to be
Dear List,
I have an encrypted swap file located inside /var, which is on a
separate LVM2 logical volume from /, but it does not get mounted on
boot. Everything I've been able to find either implies my setup should
work or is geared toward swap partitions, not swap files. I even put
Hello!
I found out the kernel was too new for debian stable udev
system. Lenny's udev needs
CONFIG_DEPRECATED_SYSFS
CONFIG_DEPRECATED_SYSFS_V2
enabled and the most actual stable kernel package has this enabled
(2.6.26-2-686) so I could update, even completely remotely, to this
version. Sadly upd
Sorry, this is not a reply but in initial message to the list.
> Are you using the kernel to autodetect the LVM volumes (using type
0xfd). It
Well I use only the kernel modules (dm_mod) and let userspace do its
stuff,
mainly debian's /etc/init.d/lvm does the job well. It relies on pvscan
dete
2-5-686
>
> Additional the versions of the following packages may be relevant:
>
> lvm2: 2.02.39-7
> libdevmapper1.02.1: 2:1.02.27-4
> udev: 0.098-2
>
> Kind Regards, Konsti
Are you using the kernel to autodetect the LVM volumes (using type 0xfd). It
does not handle the v
:
2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Aug 31 12:53:18 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
The new kernel is also debian package:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Additional the versions of the following packages may be relevant:
lvm2: 2.02.39-7
libdevmapper1.02.1: 2:1.02.27-4
udev: 0.098-2
The box is a headless production system
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:42 PM, wrote:
> Thanks for the comments and help.
>
> I have edited /boot/grub/grub.cfg to match my devices by UUID as
> proposed, getting UUIDs from blkid /dev/md{0,1} (previously I run
> blkid -g):
>
> menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-3-686-bigmem" --clas
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:31:41AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> d.sastre.med...@gmail.com put forth on 5/30/2010 4:45 PM:
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:24:41PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> What happens when you use LILO instead of Grub?
> >
> > I haven't tried that yet.
> > [ snip ]
> > But
d.sastre.med...@gmail.com put forth on 5/30/2010 4:45 PM:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:24:41PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> What happens when you use LILO instead of Grub?
>
> I haven't tried that yet.
>
> First thing would be to know if the bootloader is to blame for not
> having a bootable s
d.sastre.med...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for the comments and help.
>
> I have edited /boot/grub/grub.cfg to match my devices by UUID as
> proposed, getting UUIDs from blkid /dev/md{0,1} (previously I run
> blkid -g):
Good.
> It doesn't boot.
Bummer.
> Note a added `rootdelay=15' and removed
Thanks for the comments and help.
I have edited /boot/grub/grub.cfg to match my devices by UUID as
proposed, getting UUIDs from blkid /dev/md{0,1} (previously I run
blkid -g):
menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-3-686-bigmem" --class
debian --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:13 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 05:44:22PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:06 AM, David Sastre Medina
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Grub2 is failing to boot a softRAID1 + LVM2 squeeze box.
>> >
>>
d.sastre.med...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 05:44:22PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:06 AM, David Sastre Medina
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Grub2 is failing to boot a softRAID1 + LVM2 squeeze box.
I use an equivalent setup and it was
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:24:41PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> What happens when you use LILO instead of Grub?
I haven't tried that yet.
First thing would be to know if the bootloader is to blame for not
having a bootable system. As of now, it would be some timming issues
related to initramfs-
What happens when you use LILO instead of Grub?
d.sastre.med...@gmail.com put forth on 5/30/2010 6:13 AM:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 05:44:22PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:06 AM, David Sastre Medina
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Grub2 is failing to bo
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 05:44:22PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:06 AM, David Sastre Medina
> wrote:
> >
> > Grub2 is failing to boot a softRAID1 + LVM2 squeeze box.
> >
> > r...@sysresccd /root % mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> > /dev/md0:
&
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:06 AM, David Sastre Medina
wrote:
>
> Grub2 is failing to boot a softRAID1 + LVM2 squeeze box.
> The error is "can't find root_vg-root_lv". After that, it drops me to
> a initrd shell, but my USB keyboard stops working, so I must
> button-r
I think my previous post requires some more info:
I've got three HDs, two of them (twin disks) have two partitions,
one /boot partition (md0) and the other one for LVM filesystems (md1),
where root_vg-root_lv lives (among others). The third disk is unpatitioned,
and has one only lv (var_lv)
So, p
Hello,
Grub2 is failing to boot a softRAID1 + LVM2 squeeze box.
The error is "can't find root_vg-root_lv". After that, it drops me to
a initrd shell, but my USB keyboard stops working, so I must
button-reboot.
There are two kernels installed.
I've attached grub.cfg. It
Hi,
What might be the issue if stock kernel 2.6.30-1 boots my system just fine,
but the 2.6.30-2 version after leaving grub just sits around "loading" and
never recognizes my lvm2 volume group.
I'd appreciate any hints on how to troubleshoot this.
Thanks, Joh
--
To UNSUBS
Dear all,
I'm using the "testing" debian branch. And I've just upgrade my
redhat-cluster-module. But each time I started lvm2, I got the following
error message:
Setting up LVM Volume Groups connect() failed on local socket:
Connection refused
WARNING: Falling back
On Friday 16 October 2009 03:08:36 Joe wrote:
> So could I ask what the correct answer actually is? What combination of
> packages do we need to maintain an unbroken operating system which
> depends on both lvm2 and gnome?
AFAIK, there isn't one in sid alone. You may be abl
gnome stuff bring in
> devicekit-disks
> and
>
> 1. lvm2 requires dmsetup
> 2. devicekit-disks conflicts with dmsetup
> 3. gnome-control-center and other gnome crap need devicekit-disks
> 4. so lvm2 and dmsetup get kicked out to rc status
> 5. then you can't boot with your k
Joe wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Mitchell Laks wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently did a sid dist-upgrade, and could no longer boot using
>>> linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem kernel
>>> and had to boot off an old 2.6.26 kernel.
>> ..
>>
>>> This is a problem.
>>>
>> I guess the real problem is,
doing
dist-upgrades about which packages are removed.
Or better use a simple upgrade which does not remove packages automatically.
So could I ask what the correct answer actually is? What combination of
packages do we need to maintain an unbroken operating system which
depends on both lvm2 and
This is just to publicize the fact that
many gnome packages depend upon devicekit-disks
devicekit-disks is incompatible with
dmsetup and therefore lvm2.
If your / is on a lvm2 group you will not be able to boot.
here is a debian bug reference:
http://bugs.debian.org/550434
if you have gnome
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently did a sid dist-upgrade, and could no longer boot using
> linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem kernel
> and had to boot off an old 2.6.26 kernel.
..
>
> This is a problem.
>
I guess the real problem is, that you should be more careful when doing
dist-upg
Hi,
I recently did a sid dist-upgrade, and could no longer boot using
linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem kernel
and had to boot off an old 2.6.26 kernel.
The reason is that gnome-control-center and other gnome stuff bring in
devicekit-disks
and
1. lvm2 requires dmsetup
2. devicekit-disks
Hi Frank,
First of all, I do apologize for posting on amd64 list, I was not sure about
the scope of these two groups. Thank you for clarify.
I didn't have a chance to test the LVM snaphots, but I understand that If I
snapshot the root (/) file system on to a new snapshot/backup logical volume
and
Hi,
[Don't cross post. I am dropping debian-amd64, since the issue isn't
related to amd64]
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 23:30 -0300, Andres Migliazzo wrote:
>
> I currently have /boot and / (root) on raid 1 with mdadm. Which is
> useful for me specially when I patch the server because I break the
> mi
lvm2 a- 3.76G 0
/dev/sdb Debian lvm2 a- 4.00G 4.00G
/dev/sdc1 SwapVG lvm2 a- 192.00M 0
/dev/sdd Debian lvm2 a- 196.00M 196.00M
2. Add the new PVs into the root volume group
# vgextend Debian /dev/sd[bd]
Check:
# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev
In <4a5d2a14.9000...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On 2009-07-13 14:24, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In <4a5b841e.7010...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
In your case, you'll have to add at least 3 of the new PVs to the VG
before pvmove will let you begin. Are you going to move swap ont
On 2009-07-13 14:24, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In <4a5b841e.7010...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
In your case, you'll have to add at least 3 of the new PVs to the VG
before pvmove will let you begin. Are you going to move swap onto LVM?
If not, make sure your partition table for the new dr
In <537f90650907131240t37ff3fa9k2e72f498eec26...@mail.gmail.com>, Mike
Castle wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith
>
>Jr. wrote:
>> pvcreate /dev/sdc1
>> pvcreate /dev/sdc2
>> pvcreate /dev/sdc3
>> pvcreate /dev/sdc4
>> vgextend $vg /dev/sdc1
>> vgextend $vg /dev/sdc2
>> vg
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith
Jr. wrote:
> pvcreate /dev/sdc1
> pvcreate /dev/sdc2
> pvcreate /dev/sdc3
> pvcreate /dev/sdc4
> vgextend $vg /dev/sdc1
> vgextend $vg /dev/sdc2
> vgextend $vg /dev/sdc3
> vgextend $vg /dev/sdc4
> pvmove /dev/sda2
> pvmove /dev/sdb
> vgreduce $vg
In <4a5b841e.7010...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> In your case, you'll have to add at least 3 of the new PVs to the VG
>> before pvmove will let you begin. Are you going to move swap onto LVM?
>> If not, make sure your partition table for the new drive still has space
>> for swap.
>
>So pvmove
In <4a5b8105.2020...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On 2009-07-13 12:55, Mike Castle wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ron Johnson
wrote:
>>> What if I want 4 "small" partitions instead of one monster 1TB
>>> partition? I've read that you need a target at least as large as the
>>> source.
On 2009-07-13 13:32, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In <4a5b26b9.50...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
I have a 640GB drive that's starting to throw errors, so I'm going
to replace it with a 1TB drive.
The 640GB (596GiB) drive is partitioned into:
sdb1 - 2GiB swap
sdb2 - 594GiB lvm
On 2009-07-13 12:55, Mike Castle wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
What if I want 4 "small" partitions instead of one monster 1TB partition?
I've read that you need a target at least as large as the source.
(I've got this aching feeling that 1TB partitions are just no
In <4a5b26b9.50...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>I have a 640GB drive that's starting to throw errors, so I'm going
>to replace it with a 1TB drive.
>
>The 640GB (596GiB) drive is partitioned into:
>sdb1 - 2GiB swap
>sdb2 - 594GiB lvm2 member
>
>When I get t
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>
> What if I want 4 "small" partitions instead of one monster 1TB partition?
> I've read that you need a target at least as large as the source.
>
> (I've got this aching feeling that 1TB partitions are just not a good idea,
> and that granu
On 2009-07-13 11:54, Mike Castle wrote:
Don't try to do two things at once. If something goes wrong, you
won't know which is the cause.
Just put in the new drive and partition it into swap + lvm
swapoff /dev/sda1
vi /etc/fstab # remove swap
pvcreate
vgextend
pvmove -v /dev/sdb2
What if I w
Don't try to do two things at once. If something goes wrong, you
won't know which is the cause.
Just put in the new drive and partition it into swap + lvm
swapoff /dev/sda1
vi /etc/fstab # remove swap
pvcreate
vgextend
pvmove -v /dev/sdb2
vgreduce /dev/sdb2
shutdown and remove the bad drive
On 2009-07-13 09:42, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
When I get the new device, I want to create 4x 250GB PVs, and then move
Why? Any reason why not just less PVs?
Granularity.
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UN
Ron Johnson wrote:
> When I get the new device, I want to create 4x 250GB PVs, and then move
Why? Any reason why not just less PVs?
Cheers,
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Hi,
I have a 640GB drive that's starting to throw errors, so I'm going
to replace it with a 1TB drive.
The 640GB (596GiB) drive is partitioned into:
sdb1 - 2GiB swap
sdb2 - 594GiB lvm2 member
When I get the new device, I want to create 4x 250GB PVs, and then
move the contents of
Hi Franklin,
On Fri, July 3, 2009 4:36 pm, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> Your problem is probably inside your /boot/initrd... file
>
> You might want to "rebuild" it, using update-initramfs
Tried that, multiple ways:
update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs -n -k all
> Also, did you read /usr/shar
g up on the lvm volume group (not found) ...
> from there I can activate the md0 and md1 mirrors and activate the lvm2
> logical volumes, I then exit the sh and boot continues as normal.
>
> I've checked the kernel and module files for each machine, they are 100%
> identical
Hi,
I have 2x IBM xSeries 346 servers, one has a RAID card (let's call this
machine "346a") and the other only has onboard SCSI (346b).
Both have two RAID1 software mirrors -- one for /boot (/dev/md0) and the
other for lvm2 use (/dev/md1).
Both are running the same amd64
Le Thursday 16 April 2009 17:03:20 Sylvain Dauthieux, vous avez écrit :
> ok, but how i can compare 2 snapshots ?
>
> How access to snapshot's blocks (data modified) ?
>
> Can you help me please, i cannot any more what to do !
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sylvain Dauthieux
Tell us how you would have used lvmsa
ok, but how i can compare 2 snapshots ?
How access to snapshot's blocks (data modified) ?
Can you help me please, i cannot any more what to do !
Thanks.
Sylvain Dauthieux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Jr. :
>> In <464aa698-33b4-464a-b5be-85e3db338...@gmail.com>, Sylvain Dauthieux wrote:
>>>My problem is : "lvmsar" and "lvmsadc" are not implemented.
>>
>> Yeah, they never have been in Linux LVM2. They probably never will be
>> because
>>
Hi
2009/4/16 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. :
> In <464aa698-33b4-464a-b5be-85e3db338...@gmail.com>, Sylvain Dauthieux wrote:
>>My problem is : "lvmsar" and "lvmsadc" are not implemented.
>
> Yeah, they never have been in Linux LVM2. They probably never
In <464aa698-33b4-464a-b5be-85e3db338...@gmail.com>, Sylvain Dauthieux wrote:
>My problem is : "lvmsar" and "lvmsadc" are not implemented.
Yeah, they never have been in Linux LVM2. They probably never will be because
the standard methods of monitoring block device
First time replying so please forgive any first time mistakes.
If you "apt-cache show lvm2"
what do you see?
if you run "apt-file list lvm2 | egrep 'lvmsar|lvmsadc' "
Does it show lvmsar and lvmsadc as being present?
>From the documentation I've read
Hi all,
I'm a student in Master in French and i'm working on lvm2 (OS : Linux
Debian etch)
I need to use "lvmsar" and "lvmsadc" to collect informations about
data in snapshots. I would like to compare 2 snapshots (modified block).
My problem is :
obvious: /etc/rcS.d had
S26cryptdisks-early
S26lvm2
S28cryptdisks
Since the volumes in question are not available until the later
cryptdisks script is done, the lvm2 script doesn't see them
and the volume groups in them aren't activated.
I can fix this in two ways (tested, both work):
(1
On 02/24/2009 06:15 PM, Matthew Moore wrote:
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 02:44:14 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
No, I definitely have /sbin/fsck.ext4.
But running it doesn't fix the group descriptor error? This person is having the
same problem and looks to have resorted to dumping the fs and
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 02:44:14 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
> This looks reasonable.
> # lvdisplay
> Logging initialised at Tue Feb 24 15:42:45 2009
> Set umask to 0077
> lvdisplayFinding all logical volumes
> lvdisplay --- Logical volume ---
> lvdisplay LV Name/dev/m
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
