On 17/02/2023 00:46, Greg Marks wrote:
When trying to print a file that contains emojis with the lpr
command, not only do the emojis not print, nothing following the first
non-printing emoji prints. (This makes it a hassle to print certain
e-mails piped to lpr using mutt.) As a small example
On 2/16/23 22:46, Greg Marks wrote:
When trying to print a file that contains emojis with the lpr
command, not only do the emojis not print, nothing following the first
non-printing emoji prints. (This makes it a hassle to print certain
e-mails piped to lpr using mutt.) As a small example
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:46:40 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> Does anyone have a good way of printing text that contains emojis?
I took your test.txt file, html-ized it, and looked at it in a browser.
I then "printed" it to a PDF file. Both showed the 馃槉 emoji. I didn't
actually print it, but that shoul
When trying to print a file that contains emojis with the lpr
command, not only do the emojis not print, nothing following the first
non-printing emoji prints. (This makes it a hassle to print certain
e-mails piped to lpr using mutt.) As a small example, after entering
the command:
echo -e
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Hm. Looking into the Postscript files, tst.ps has one page and
tst2.ps has two. So it seems to work as intended.
Why do you expect tst2.ps to only yield one page?
hi Tomas,
you are perfectly right: I used the wrong tool (xv) to display the file.
I
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:41:36PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have 2 postscript files, tst.ps and tst2.ps. (cf attached files)
> with: lpr -P pdf tst.ps, I get a 1 page tst.pdf
> with: lpr -P pdf tst2.ps, I get a 2 pages tst2.pdf
> Can anybody help to solve th
hi,
I have 2 postscript files, tst.ps and tst2.ps. (cf attached files)
with: lpr -P pdf tst.ps, I get a 1 page tst.pdf
with: lpr -P pdf tst2.ps, I get a 2 pages tst2.pdf
Can anybody help to solve this mystery?
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
tst.ps
Description: PostScript document
tst2.ps
On Sun 25 Oct 2015 at 04:29:14 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > The packages cups-bsd, lpr, and lprng all have lpr. Try installing them
> > and removing them in turn, and see which works.
>
> Installation of cups-bsd did the trick.
So it should. For all practical purpo
On 10/25/2015 05:29 AM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>> The packages cups-bsd, lpr, and lprng all have lpr. Try installing them
>> and removing them in turn, and see which works.
> Installation of cups-bsd did the trick.
>
> BTW, I tried installing lpr before and it did not hel
> The packages cups-bsd, lpr, and lprng all have lpr. Try installing them
> and removing them in turn, and see which works.
Installation of cups-bsd did the trick.
BTW, I tried installing lpr before and it did not help.
This is weird, since I've looked into my i386 installation
ry to print from it on amd64 install the error:"/bin/sh:
> 1: lpr: not found" is thrown on me.
>
> I've tested printing with 'lp' from CLI and it works equally well on both
> installations. Checked out and 'lpr' is not installed on neither of
>
installs with one exception described below.
When I run the same application in Wine on i386 install, I can print from
the app just fine.
However, when I try to print from it on amd64 install the error:"/bin/sh:
1: lpr: not found" is thrown on me.
I've tested printing with '
Emanuel Berg writes:
> This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
> I say "most of the time" as sometimes the image gets
> cut in the edges - I don't know why ...
This hack still hasn't failed me. First, I do a PDF
that is A5 (i.e., smaller than A4). Then I print it on
a regular A4.
#
This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
I say "most of the time" as sometimes the image gets
cut in the edges - I don't know why.
jpeg2pdf () {
local pic=$1
local pdf=${pic:r}.pdf
gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite \
-sPAPERSIZE=a4 \
-o $pdf viewjpe
I wrote this zsh wrapper to `convert' to do it.
With the 72 PPI resolution, the image get smaller!
With the 200 PPI resolution, the image gets bigger,
and it looks good when viewed with feh, but when
I print (with lpr) the increased-size image gets split
up in two parts on the paper with a
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
> > printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could
> > look u
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
> printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could
> look up the Postscript for that, but I'm wondering if there's a way to
> force
On Thu 11 Dec 2014 at 11:14:23 -0800, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
> printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could look
> up the Postscript for that, but I'm wondering if there'
I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could look
up the Postscript for that, but I'm wondering if there's a way to force
either of groff or lpr to do it for me.
--
Kevin O'Gorman
#
; text-only
> > printer driver and sending a job myself through the cups-lpr service, I
> get
> > the desired output.
> >
> > For what it's worth, the control characters in this particular case are:
> >
> ^[E^[&l0S^[&l5H^[&l1O^[(8U^[(s0P^[(s15H^
> printer driver and sending a job myself through the cups-lpr service, I get
> the desired output.
>
> For what it's worth, the control characters in this particular case are:
> ^[E^[&l0S^[&l5H^[&l1O^[(8U^[(s0P^[(s15H^[(s8.5V^[(s0S^[(s0B^[(s0T^[&l5.2727
Hello
I am struggling with an issue - hopefully someone has some experience they
can share.
I am trying to implement a PDF printer for a legacy mainframe process that
prints reports to an LPR remote target. I have no access to the job
provider, I am on the target end with a setup as below:
cups
seems that needs from external drivers which is always a bad signal
(ufff.. how bad, it's a GDI printer).
> The Brother website has a linux LPR driver in .deb format that
> installed and worked easily under Lenny using the gnome Printer install
> menu. Under Squeeze, the gnome Pr
On 24/08/12 10:39 PM, Rick Lutowski wrote:
Am trying to get a Brother HL-2240 printer working with a new debian
Squeeze installation. The Brother website has a linux LPR driver in
.deb format that installed and worked easily under Lenny using the
gnome Printer install menu. Under Squeeze
Am trying to get a Brother HL-2240 printer working with a new debian
Squeeze installation. The Brother website has a linux LPR driver in
.deb format that installed and worked easily under Lenny using the gnome
Printer install menu. Under Squeeze, the gnome Printer install menu
seems to be
Dom wrote:
On 03/02/12 12:48, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/u
On 03/02/12 12:48, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
gnus
On Friday 03,February,2012 09:01 PM, lina wrote:
On Friday 03,February,2012 06:49 PM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 03 Feb 2012, Russell L. Harris wrote:
There is a bit more to this matter than the package "lpr".
About a decade ago, the package lprng ("ng" meaning "nex
On Friday 03,February,2012 06:49 PM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 03 Feb 2012, Russell L. Harris wrote:
There is a bit more to this matter than the package "lpr".
About a decade ago, the package lprng ("ng" meaning "next generation")
fixed most of the prob
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
gnuspool: /usr/bin/lpr
lpr: /usr/bin
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
> which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
gnuspool: /usr/bin/lpr
lpr: /usr/bin/lpr
lprng: /usr/bin/lpr
Not su
* Anthony Campbell [120203 11:21]:
> Interesting: I didn't know about the purchase by Apple. I always
> preferred lprng to cups but for some reason one of my laptops no longer
> gave me /dev/lp0 so I was forced to use cups on that machine. I had some
> problems with cups last summer (had to take t
On 03 Feb 2012, Russell L. Harris wrote:
>
> There is a bit more to this matter than the package "lpr".
>
> About a decade ago, the package lprng ("ng" meaning "next generation")
> fixed most of the problems of the package lpr. Most importantly, t
* Bob Proulx [120203 05:40]:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> For whatever reason the folks around here seem to prefer lprng over
> lpr. And of course the lpr command is also provided by cups-bsd /
> cups. So there seem to be three flavors available.
There is a bit more to this matter than
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, lee wrote:
> lina writes:
>
>> well, I have a derived problem, after installing lpr,
>>
>> $ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
>> lpr: lp: unknown printer
>>
>> $ lpstat
>> HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 聽 lina 聽 聽 聽 聽 聽 聽156672 聽 Thurs
lina writes:
> well, I have a derived problem, after installing lpr,
>
> $ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
> lpr: lp: unknown printer
>
> $ lpstat
> HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina156672 Thursday
> 02,February,2012 11:35:38 AM SGT
>
> lp ProbSet_2.pdf
> request id i
ll, I have a derived problem, after installing lpr,
$ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
lpr: lp: unknown printer
$ lpstat
HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina156672 Thursday
02,February,2012 11:35:38 AM SGT
lp ProbSet_2.pdf
request id is HP-LaserJet-P4015-226 (1 file(s))
I don't know what's go
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> lina wrote:
> > which package contains the lpr command for printing.
>
> Surprisingly... lpr
> Provided by: cups-bsd, lprng
> Description: BSD lpr/lpd line printer spooling system
For whatever reason the folks around here seem to prefer lprng over
lp
> Hi,
>
> which package contains the lpr command for printing.
>
> Thanks,
>
lpr is the name of the package.
If a progam is installed, you can use:
dpkg -S
to find the package name. If it is not installed you can use:
apt-cache search
Depending on your setup you may wan
lling lpr,
$ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
lpr: lp: unknown printer
$ lpstat
HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina156672 Thursday
02,February,2012 11:35:38 AM SGT
lp ProbSet_2.pdf
request id is HP-LaserJet-P4015-226 (1 file(s))
I don't know what's going on.
thanks,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 2/1/2012 9:43 PM, lina wrote:
>
>> which package contains the lpr command for printing.
>
> Surprisingly... lpr
aha ... thanks,
>
> $ aptitude show lpr
> Package: lpr
> State: not installed
> Version:
On 2/1/2012 9:43 PM, lina wrote:
> which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Surprisingly... lpr
$ aptitude show lpr
Package: lpr
State: not installed
Version: 1:2008.05.17
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Adam Majer
Uncompressed Size: 410 k
Depends: libc6 (>=
Hi,
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAG9cJmm3FajWtM=qm1agsvgvya7tpsjrx30-
lpr have over lp?
In todays systems I fail to see a clear difference on both :-?
This article may help:
***
8.17 Printing Protocols (lpr and lp)
http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking/firewall/ch08_17.htm
The System V lp printing system doesn't really have a remote printing
component.
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:13:20 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-04 05:57, Camale贸n wrote:
(...)
>> we can use whichever best suits our needs.
>
> Right.
>
> But, absent old or cross-platform scripts which need to run on both
> Linux and BSD, what *benefit* do
On 2010-04-04 05:57, Camale贸n wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:37:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for
compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only be a
"half-the-features" lp.
It seems to have less options,
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:37:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for
> compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only be a
> "half-the-features" lp.
It seems to have less options, yes.
But both ("lp&quo
I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for
compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only
be a "half-the-features" lp.
--
"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak
or the timid." Dwight Eisenhower
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:52:26PM -0400, John wrote:
> Following Ben Finney's finding under Bug #530027, I downgraded
> everything cups to 1.3.8-1lenny5. That in turn required a frightening
I'm pretty sure it's a regression or incompatibility. So, I've gone
ahead and filed a bug against the pack
On (22/06/09 19:39), Florian Kulzer wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:24:09 -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
| > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:48:15PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
| > None of which really addresses the question of what the error message
| > means.
|
| I decide which questions I conside
ime I checked was before the upgrade to Lenny. The utilities are
> provided by:
>
> cups-client: /usr/bin/lp
> cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpq
> cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
>
> and I have the following packages installed:
>
> cups-client/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+l
I'm not getting any logs from the local cups-client, but the remote
server is logging the following when I attempt to print (see previous
post):
192.168.101.103 - - [21/Jun/2009:02:20:49 -0700] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 400 0 - -
192.168.101.103 - - [21/Jun/2009:02:20:49 -0700] "POST /printers/hpo
: /usr/bin/lp
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpq
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
and I have the following packages installed:
cups-client/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+lenny6
cups-bsd/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+lenny6
None of which really addresses the question of what the error message
means. If I can s
$ lpq
> lpq: error - no default destination available.
>
> $ echo foo | lpr
> lpr: Error - scheduler not responding!
>
> And the following acts as a no-op:
>
> $ echo foo | lp
>
> This was working as-is a few upgrades ago.
What kind of upgrades? (In
I have cupsd configured on a remote host to publish its printers, and
the web interface on http://localhost:631 on the local server sees the
remote printers and a defined default printer. However:
$ lpq
lpq: error - no default destination available.
$ echo foo | lpr
lpr
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, at 19:42 +1200, You wrote:
> > [AGGIORNATO] liborbit2 1:2.14.16-0.1 -> 1:2.14.17-0.1
> > [AGGIORNATO] lxdvdrip 1.74-0.0 -> 1.74-0.1
> > ===
>
> To get your output in English, put LANG=C before the
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:48:51AM +0200, beatrice wrote:
> Please keep in mind that English is not my first language and if I
> forgot any relevant information, I'd be happy to provide it.
>
> Thanks,
> beatrice.
>
> ===from my aptitude logs.
>
> NOTE: my logs are localized in Italian. AGG
beatrice wrote:
> I think I'll write a couple lines to Brother's customer service
> anyway, now that I know I am not the only one with this
> problem.
I don't know if the error is with Brother or with ghostscript. In
the meantime I filed a bug against ghostscript:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Friday 03 April 2009, at 16:13 +0200, You wrote:
Hi!
> With any luck, the 8.63 versions of these packages are still in
> your /var/cache/apt/archives, and you can install them with dpkg
> -i. Otherwise you must go to packages.debian.org and get the 8.62
> versions from "stable"; it seems that
The problem is, as you suspected, caused by ghostscript. I
downgraded to version 8.63 and it started to work again. You have
to downgrade 3 packages: libgs8, ghostscript, and ghostscript-x.
With any luck, the 8.63 versions of these packages are still in
your /var/cache/apt/archives, and you can ins
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> beatrice wrote:
>> I have a Brother HL2040 printer that worked perfectly well on
>> my Debian testing with the .deb driver package Brother
>> provides. I don't have CUPS installed, I use lpr. My printer
>> stopped working without me c
beatrice wrote:
> I have a Brother HL2040 printer that worked perfectly well on
> my Debian testing with the .deb driver package Brother
> provides. I don't have CUPS installed, I use lpr. My printer
> stopped working without me changing any system configuration
> other t
Hi!
I have a Brother HL2040 printer that worked perfectly well on my Debian
testing with the .deb driver package Brother provides. I don't have CUPS
installed, I use lpr. My printer stopped working without me changing any
system configuration other than my usual package updating via aptitud
> >From that page:
>> It is the perfect solution for changing dates, numbers or small
>> portions of text.
>
> I don't think that this practicable, if you continue to work with your
> document for repeated 'edit, print' cycles.
>
In my experiments so far it's worked fine, but I will have to look a
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> But I just
> discovered this OOo extension which allows the user to save the
> document as PDF with the ODF file embedded for editing:
> http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/pdfimport
>
> This is, in my opinion, the perfect document format. The only thing
> mi
> Think there is a little confusion here that needs to be cleared up:
>
> ODF if not supposed to be a printable format. 聽It is the native format used
> by OOo to store its working files for editing, not printing - it is NOT a
> page description language like PDF or PostScript.
>
I now know that. B
Matthew Smith wrote:
It would certainly be possible to write a command-line application to
convert ODF to PostScript, PDF etcetera. The document format is open
so there is nothing stopping anyone from cobbling something together
with, say Perl and XSLT. If nobody has done this and you don't
Quoth Dotan Cohen at 2009-03-17 08:24...
Or you can use the "cups-pdf" package.
That's what I am using. However, it appears that cups cannot accept an
ODF file as input. I suppose that OOo is internally converting the ODF
to PS for printing.
Think there is a little confusion here that needs t
> Or you can use the "cups-pdf" package.
>
That's what I am using. However, it appears that cups cannot accept an
ODF file as input. I suppose that OOo is internally converting the ODF
to PS for printing.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
讗-讘-讙-讚-讛-讜-讝-讞-讟-讬-讱-讻-诇-诐
* Tzafrir Cohen 15.03.2009
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:47:43PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > I just noticed that I can in fact print PDF files this way, so the
> > problem is that I am trying to print an ODT file. How can I convert
> > that ODT to PDF on the command line? I have googled that befo
> As mentioned in previous threads: abirod should be able to do that.
>
Thanks, Tzafrir. I had STFW, but I obviously did not STFA.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
讗-讘-讙-讚-讛-讜-讝-讞-讟-讬-讱-讻-诇-诐-诪-谉-谞-住-注-祝-驻-抓-爪-拽-专-砖-转
丕-亘-鬲-孬-噩-丨-禺-丿-匕-乇-夭-爻-卮-氐-囟-胤-馗-毓-睾-賮-賯-賰-賱-賲
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:47:43PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I just noticed that I can in fact print PDF files this way, so the
> problem is that I am trying to print an ODT file. How can I convert
> that ODT to PDF on the command line? I have googled that before and
> could not figure it out, ev
I just noticed that I can in fact print PDF files this way, so the
problem is that I am trying to print an ODT file. How can I convert
that ODT to PDF on the command line? I have googled that before and
could not figure it out, even after installing OOo scripts and other
nasties.
--
Dotan Cohen
I am trying to print to PDF with lpr:
$ lpr -P PDF todo.odt
I see that the file is put in the PDF jobs (using KDE's Kjobviewer)
but it doesn't get written anywhere. The $HOME/PDF directory exists,
in fact, I can print to PDF from Firefox with no problems. Any ideas
why this is not wo
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:46:43PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Its an HP NetServer LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
> 2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
> up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available. If there's a cha
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:46:43 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that computers keep
> getting quieter but I wonder what the fan noise would compare to, say
> a dual P-133 box?
If it's anything like a LH3, expect noise like from an industrial
vacuum cleaner. Even if the n
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:29:16PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 11/11/08 21:46, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >Its an HP NetServer LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
> >2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
> >up (no shippin
found item number 46408316.
Its an HP NetServer LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available. If there's a chance it
would work for my wife, it would be inexpens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Has anyone used these servers? Any gotya's?
I ran one for 2 yrs as a DNS server with 18GB SCSI. It never missed a
beat! However it was a very noisy sever.
- --
Cheers,
Julian De Marchi
- --
OpenNIC user - http://www.opennicproject.org/ | http://ww
erver LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available. If there's a chance it
would work for my wife, it would be inexpensive enough.
I've seen (and tried to boot
s. On my very old boxes, I run OpenBSD.
> Since, I discover FreeBSD.
Also a suitable choice for some boxes.
> Thanks for your help.
No problem.
> >>My problem is with lpr/lpq. For example, sometimes lpq (or lpr) blocks
> >>on connect(), sometimes not, it depends. When I
(or is
it about to end; there was a message about it this past week. Etch has
been out for a whole year now).
> My problem is with lpr/lpq. For example, sometimes lpq (or lpr) blocks
> on connect(), sometimes not, it depends. When I run strace lpq :
I don't know how to read a strace.
Hello,
I'm running the lpd spooler with Debian Sarge. My kernel version is
2.6.8-4-686-smp (last stock kernel) and the Debian system is up to date.
My problem is with lpr/lpq. For example, sometimes lpq (or lpr) blocks
on connect(), sometimes not, it depends. When I run strace lpq :
b
Is it possible obtain job number after lpr command without use lpstat?
lpstat get me all job completed and not, but with hight volume of jobs
I can't associate print and his job.
Thx.
--
Openclose.it - Idee per il software libero
http://www.openclose.it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For printers on UNIX hosts, you probably want to use lpr:// with the
> host's address in the URL. Of course, the host has to be configured to
> allow remote printing, and you'll need to know the queue name.
Wow, that wor
en proceed
from there. This nearly always works, although sometimes finding the
correct driver is tricky.
For printers on UNIX hosts, you probably want to use lpr:// with the
host's address in the URL. Of course, the host has to be configured
to allow remote printing, and you'
use with it are generally
junk, and I'm usually better off going to the CUPS web interface and
dealing with it directly. Now I greatly prefer it to mucking around
with /etc/printcap and trying to set up filter packages by hand.
When I was using lpr-style printing systems, lpd always seemed
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:17:56AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> to choose not to use cups). I'm baffled by the source of this
>> continued trouble, though I don't deny its existence.
>
> You should have stopped sooner! You're just baffled - FULL STOP!
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:09:05AM +0200, s. keeling wrote:
> I'll bite. It does. Install a print daemon (lpr(ng)), install
> anything else that's even remotely related to printing, it drags in
> CUPS, and CUPS blows away lpr(ng).
>
Funny, I haven't had anything
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
to choose not to use cups). I'm baffled by the source of this
continued trouble, though I don't deny its existence.
You should have stopped sooner! You're just baffled - FULL STOP!
:-)
Nice to see you again! Still getting SPAM? I'm not.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s
or CUPS etc assumes that you have
> a printer directly attached to your machine (and I get the impression
> that this is the focus of development).
>
> I've basically given up on printing from my debian machine; I just login
> to the sunos server and use lpr when I need to print
ur machine (and I get the impression
that this is the focus of development).
I've basically given up on printing from my debian machine; I just login
to the sunos server and use lpr when I need to print something...
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:49:37PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:35:15PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> >> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > that's better than the typical "cups sucks" flamewar we get..
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:35:15PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
>> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> that's better than the typical "cups sucks" flamewar we get... cue in
> 3..2..1..
>
> A
I have to admit that I am pretty much enti
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:35:15PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > cupsys-bsd package provide /usr/bin/lpr. you should not need to
> > > ins
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:35:15PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > cupsys-bsd package provide /usr/bin/lpr. you should not need to
> > install an additional package to get lpr functionality.
> >
>
>
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> cupsys-bsd package provide /usr/bin/lpr. you should not need to
> install an additional package to get lpr functionality.
>
Well, there you go. I did not have that particular package installed,
rather having only cupsy
and would like to be able to print from within that app, and it uses
> lpr, which I have never installed. I had wondered if that would cause
cupsys-bsd package provide /usr/bin/lpr. you should not need to
install an additional package to get lpr functionality.
...
>
> So, what I am w
I have an HP Deskjet printer which I have set up using CUPS. It has
always functioned fine, and I can use lp to print without any problems,
and openoffice, browsers and such work just fine. However, I use Emacs
and would like to be able to print from within that app, and it uses
lpr, which I
one here in Hungary. I made a symbolic link
in /usr/local/bin:
ln -s /usr/bin/gtklp lpr
So, since /usr/local/bin precedes /usr/bin in my path, wine (and other
tools) use gtklp to print. This approach may also work for you while
you are waiting for your government to make their tax software
platform-
1 - 100 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
