Emanuel Berg writes:
> This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
> I say "most of the time" as sometimes the image gets
> cut in the edges - I don't know why ...
This hack still hasn't failed me. First, I do a PDF
that is A5 (i.e., smaller than A4). Then I print it on
a regular A4.
#
This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
I say "most of the time" as sometimes the image gets
cut in the edges - I don't know why.
jpeg2pdf () {
local pic=$1
local pdf=${pic:r}.pdf
gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite \
-sPAPERSIZE=a4 \
-o $pdf viewjpe
I wrote this zsh wrapper to `convert' to do it.
With the 72 PPI resolution, the image get smaller!
With the 200 PPI resolution, the image gets bigger,
and it looks good when viewed with feh, but when
I print (with lpr) the increased-size image gets split
up in two parts on the paper with a black
On 2015-01-30, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-01-30, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> What about the Japanese?
>>
>
> Sorry. What I read was restricted to anglophones.
Well, let's say "American Study" using empirical evidence gathered in
the good old USA applicable to, well, not the Japanese, obviously.
No, I'm
On 2015-01-30, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> What about the Japanese?
>
Sorry. What I read was restricted to anglophones.
What about illiterates?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: ht
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:24:32 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> What about the Japanese?
not to mention the Israelis, Farsis, Urdus, and the Muslims ?
Cheers,
Ron.
--
A pessimist is an optimist
in full possession of the facts.
On Friday 30 January 2015 10:23:18 Curt wrote:
> I once read
> that flipping through magazines from back to front (a habit of mine, as
> the interesting stuff is always in the back) is the sign of a left-handed
> individual who has been deprived in infancy of his natural impulse
> towards non-major
On 2015-01-30, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>
> Doesn't X documents this as Mouse-1 and Mouse-3? Clicking Mouse-1 is
> the primary mouse button. No need to stress left or right and no need
> for confusing "non-dominant mouse button" either. :-) I would go
> with mouse-1.
>
Have we taken the politicall
Bret Busby wrote:
> I try to consistently use the term "non-dominant mouse button" rather
> than "right-clicking", to allow for people who use left handed mice,
> as well as right-handed mice. My wife, who is a software developer,
> uses mice and pointing devices (she sometimes uses trackball thing
Lisi writes:
> Makes sense - but it needs the explanation. :-/ Right click is less
> confusing, and can always be "translated".
It certainly does need explanation. "Non-dominant mouse button" makes
no sense at all to me. None of the four buttons on my trackball are
dominant.
--
John Hasler
jha
On Thursday 29 January 2015 19:52:21 Bret Busby wrote:
> I try to consistently use the term "non-dominant mouse button" rather
> than "right-clicking", to allow for people who use left handed mice,
> as well as right-handed mice. My wife, who is a software developer,
> uses mice and pointing device
On 30/01/2015, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>
>>> As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
>>> (gimp ), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's
>>> internal
>>> file manager).
>>
>> Then,
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>> As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
>> (gimp ), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's internal
>> file manager).
>
> Then, in the absence of information to the contrary, I assume that you
>
that bug report, whilst it refers to the same error
>> message, relates to a different version of Debian; that bug report
>> refers to Debian 7.1.
>
>> As indicated, I am using Debian 6.x LTS.
>>
>
> As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
> (
essage, relates to a different version of Debian; that bug report
> refers to Debian 7.1.
> As indicated, I am using Debian 6.x LTS.
>
As I said, I successfully open jpeg files from the console
(gimp ), as well as from inside the gimp (using gimp's internal
file manager).
Once again,
On Thursday 29 January 2015 14:52:53 Bret Busby wrote:
> >>> There is this bug report:
> >>>
> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
> >>
> >> That just gives me a web page that displays
> >> "Redirecting you to
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519";
file", and this problem occurred after that update had been
implemented.
I can not find from the full message header as displayed in gmail,
which version number of Debian, you are using. Are you using Debian
6.x LTS, or, Debian 7.x (or, yet another version of Debian)?
If you are not also using
On Thursday 29 January 2015 13:55:55 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2015 08:49:14 Curt did opine
>
> And Gene did reply:
> > On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
> > >> There is this bug report:
> > >>
> > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
> > >
> > > That just
On Thursday 29 January 2015 08:49:14 Curt did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
> >> There is this bug report:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
> >
> > That just gives me a web page that displays
> > "Redirecting you to
> > https://bug
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
>
>> There is this bug report:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519
>
> That just gives me a web page that displays
> "Redirecting you to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734519";
> that goes nowhere.
>
Looks like yet ano
On 29/01/2015, Curt wrote:
Thank you, Curt, for your quick response.
> On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>> I was unable to open that file.
>>
>> I now can not open JPEG files with the GIMP.
>>
>> The error message returned, includes
>>
>>
On 2015-01-29, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> I was unable to open that file.
>
> I now can not open JPEG files with the GIMP.
>
> The error message returned, includes
>
> "
> GIMP Message
>
> Plug-in crashed: "file-jpeg"
> (/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/
Subject: New problem with GIMP plugin file-jpeg
To: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hello.
I have, in the last hour, tried to open a JPEG file, to crop it, using the GIMP.
I was unable to open that file.
I now can not open JPEG files with the GIMP.
The error message returned, includes
"
GIMP M
On 09/30/2014 06:20 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
As you can see I'm using mpv and it plays perfectly, it even mentions
the attached picture. Try mpv, I use it for everything.
So whether xine has a bug, I don't know, but if you can play it using
mpv, then I'd report the bug against xine saying wher
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:06:41AM +0200, Johann Klammer wrote:
> Well, I know that an mp3 is not a JPEG file. But why does it matter to xine
> (or libav or whatever).
>
> This is what I get on stdout when trying to play some random downloaded
> podcast using xine.
>
> [..
Well, I know that an mp3 is not a JPEG file. But why does it matter to
xine (or libav or whatever).
This is what I get on stdout when trying to play some random downloaded
podcast using xine.
[...]
[mp3 @ 0xa660260] max_analyze_duration reached
[mp3 @ 0xa660260] Estimating duration from
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:25:48 -0500, Jack Schneider wrote:
> I have two jpeg files on my desktop. Both show correct file sizes in
> Properties. Running Debian Squeeze Up2date. Printer is Lexmark C540
> Xl, printer properties shows connected to printer. via my local network.
>
>
Hi, All
I have two jpeg files on my desktop. Both show correct file sizes in
Properties. Running Debian Squeeze Up2date. Printer is Lexmark C540
Xl, printer properties shows connected to printer. via my local network.
Using Gthumb to print, it sends to queue and hangs... never prints...
Lexmark
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Mitchell Laks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have always noticed that when my HP laserjet 1200 postscript printer
> is printing images, it goes very very slowly.
>
> i use Foomatic/pxlmono (recommended) driver.
>
> However for some reason,
>
> at work
Hi,
I have always noticed that when my HP laserjet 1200 postscript printer
is printing images, it goes very very slowly.
i use Foomatic/pxlmono (recommended) driver.
However for some reason,
at work the windows printers are very fast.
What is wrong. What am i doing wrong?
Is true of any we
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image (saved in
jpeg) to a pdf format?
As far as I know sam2p [1] is one of the best for that kind of jobs.
s.
[1] http://www.inf.bme.hu/~pts/sam2p
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image
(saved in jpeg) to a pdf format?
try `convert' from the imagemagick suite.
For eg:
convert source.jpg dest.pdf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:35:18PM -0500, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image
> (saved in jpeg) to a pdf format?
I suppose it depends on what you're doing. I don't know of a
command-line tool that will take foo.jpg and turn it int
Is there such a utility that can convert a scaned image
(saved in jpeg) to a pdf format?
-ishwar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Dimecres 05 Setembre 2007, Florian Kulzer va escriure:
> $ identify -verbose The-Horse-in-Motion.jpg | grep Quality
> Quality: 85
Thanks, Florian and Oscar. Identify works fine :)
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/05/07 09:28, Oscar Diaz Fernandez wrote:
>
> You can try with: identify -verbose image.jpeg
I'm not sure that JPEG images store "compression level" like zip
files do.
>
>
> On 9/5/07, *Benjamí Villoslada
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 15:46:52 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows what command line program can display the compression info from
> JPEG files? Thanks!
One possibility is using the "identify" command from the imagemagick
package:
$ identify
You can try with: identify -verbose image.jpeg
Regards,
Óscar Díaz.
On 9/5/07, Benjamí Villoslada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows what command line program can display the compression info
> from
> JPEG files? Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Benjamí
> http://blog.bitassa.cat
>
>
>
> .
>
>
Hi,
Anyone knows what command line program can display the compression info from
JPEG files? Thanks!
Regards,
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
Try with this program:
http://sign-el-soft.hu/cgi/ng-xim.en.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:12:47AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >Anybody know how to make a jpeg image fill the entire printed page and
> >print it as such?
> >
>
> I manage it in a ridiculous way: I display them with:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/wo
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I have scanned document images that are jpeg files.
But I want to print them so that they fill the whole printed page.
It doesn't seem to work :-(
The images are 1204x1644. With Imagemagick or feh they show up
fullscreen, but when I print them they keep fi
Hi,
I have scanned document images that are jpeg files.
But I want to print them so that they fill the whole printed page.
It doesn't seem to work :-(
The images are 1204x1644. With Imagemagick or feh they show up
fullscreen, but when I print them they keep filling about a quarter
Am 2006-05-31 20:17:34, schrieb H.S.:
> That was really great help. Thank a ton. The problem of identifying an
> image as progressive or not is solved.
I use the "netpbm" package and its tools.
> The problem left is to convert all my current jpegs into progressive
> ones. jpegtran did the job (t
H.S.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi Wayne,
>
> I tried your way and converted all the image with quality 25. You are
> right, I couldn't notice any perceptual difference at normal size. The
> different is noticable only if you magnify the image.
>
> I had a total of 14 images o
Wayne Topa wrote:
> All of the inages on our web site are converted with the 'quality 25'
> option. I find a lot of sites with images that are 100K or more just
> take too long to load. There are still a lot of us that live in the
> sticks and don't have access to anything but slow POT lines.
t look that different from
the larger file image.
Basically, it boils down to decreasing the quality of the jpeg file
while maintaining the perceptual quality reasonably well.
>>I am still playing around to decide what size (in pixels) images to
>>upload for others to view and ho
H.S.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> >
>
> But converting a jpeg to progressive somehow has the effect that the
> progressive jpeg file is slightly smaller than the non-progressive one,
> but the client then uses up more RAM to reco
Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> Having never heard of "a progressive jpeg" I was interested in your
> query, and the answer you received.
>
> I tried out the conversion to "progressive" on some of my large jpegs
> to see if it would help (as I have the same prob
t says
> > None then it isnt a progressive jpeg and if it says Plane it is.
>
> That was really great help. Thank a ton. The problem of identifying an
> image as progressive or not is solved.
>
> >
> > To convert from basic to progressive use convert infile.jpg
Olafur Jens Sigurdsson wrote:
> Imagemagick does the trick for you.
>
> To see if your files are interlaced or not you can use identify
> -verbose filename.jpg and search for the Interlace line and if it says
> None then it isnt a progressive jpeg and if it says Plane it is.
re interlaced or not you can use identify
-verbose filename.jpg and search for the Interlace line and if it says
None then it isnt a progressive jpeg and if it says Plane it is.
To convert from basic to progressive use convert infile.jpg -interlace
Plane outfile.jpg
HTH
Oli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Hello,
I have searched google but haven't found an answer I was looking for. I
want to upload some family pics to share among relatives. Some have
dialup connections. To facilitate image downloads in their browsers, I
want to upload progressive jpegs. How do I find out if the jpegs I
already have
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:56:03AM -0500, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:05:42PM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
I can't be bothered to consult the man page, but it will be something like:
for $f in `ls *.bmp`; do convert $f --to-jpeg; done
Because I li
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:05:42PM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
> I can't be bothered to consult the man page, but it will be something like:
>
> for $f in `ls *.bmp`; do convert $f --to-jpeg; done
Because I like to add little bits of efficiency where
necessary, I&#x
Am 2006-01-25 11:35:31, schrieb Lubos Vrbka:
> Michelle Konzack napsal(a):
> > for X in *.bmp ; do
> >bmptopnm $X |pnmtojpeg -quality 100 >`basename .bmp`.jpg
> > done
> probably no need to install netpbm
But with my solution you do not need to install imagemagic. :-P
Greetings
Michelle
Michelle Konzack napsal(a):
Am 2006-01-14 20:55:34, schrieb Serena Cantor:
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
> apt-get install netpbm
>
> for X in *.bmp ; do
Am 2006-01-14 21:27:11, schrieb Serena Cantor:
> Thank Brad Sawatzky,
> Star King of the Grape Trees,
> and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Does Linux have to be so hard to use?(The user has to
What is Hard? - You get all tools for free and do what you want.
On proprietary software you mustr work hard
Am 2006-01-14 20:55:34, schrieb Serena Cantor:
> I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
> can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
> batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
apt-get install netpbm
for X in *.bmp ; do
bmptopnm $X |pnmtojpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:26:16 -0500:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:10:21PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> > I don't think there is a fixed limit glob buffer. Are you sure you
> > are not confusing this with the amount of space bash is allowed to
> > allocate for arguments for spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Connors wrote:
> Nope.
>
> #mkdir tmp
> #cd tmp
> #for i in `seq 1 1` ; do touch "blah $i" ; done
> #for f in `ls *`; do ls -lA "$f"; done
> ls: blah: No such file or directory
> ls: 1: No such file or directory
> ls: blah: No such file or dir
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:10:21PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> Star King of the Grape Trees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Mon, 16 Jan 2006
> 10:47:03 +1100:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 08:40 +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Why on earth would you
Tim Connors wrote:
Nope -- heaps of people have done this before you. Did you pick this
technique up from someone else?
It'd be nice if the technique would kindly stop propogating :)
Well, I believe I got this from some "advanced" bash guide, or a man
page or two.
I don't think there
Star King of the Grape Trees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Mon, 16 Jan 2006
10:47:03 +1100:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 08:40 +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>Why on earth would you want to put ls in backticks? I wonder who
> >>originated this rather redundant
done <-- Note I have NOT tested this.
Try googling for
"useless use of cat awards" for another redundant construct that
people love to use.
for f in *.bmp ; do convert $f --to-jpeg ; done
But even better than the above is just:
mogrify -format jpg *.bmp
You can probably al
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 08:40 +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> Star King of the Grape Trees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Sun, 15 Jan 2006
> 16:05:42 +1100:
> > Serena Cantor wrote:
> >
> > >I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
> > >can't f
Star King of the Grape Trees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Sun, 15 Jan 2006
16:05:42 +1100:
> Serena Cantor wrote:
>
> >I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
> >can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
> >batch fashion. Do you know
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Serena Cantor wrote:
> Thank Brad Sawatzky,
> Star King of the Grape Trees,
> and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problem. I'm glad I could help.
> Does Linux have to be so hard to use?(The user has to
> be able to program in shell script or C or other)
> Without Brad, I'd rather
Serena Cantor wrote:
Thank Brad Sawatzky,
Star King of the Grape Trees,
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does Linux have to be so hard to use?(The user has to
be able to program in shell script or C or other)
Without Brad, I'd rather download Photoshop which has
a menu for batch convertion.
Thanks!
Thank Brad Sawatzky,
Star King of the Grape Trees,
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does Linux have to be so hard to use?(The user has to
be able to program in shell script or C or other)
Without Brad, I'd rather download Photoshop which has
a menu for batch convertion.
Thanks!
__
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Serena Cantor wrote:
> I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
> can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
> batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
This shell script should do it:
for f in *.bmp; do nf=`basename "
Serena Cantor wrote:
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
I can't be bothered to consult the man page, but it will be something like:
for $f in `ls *.bmp`; do
Serena Cantor wrote:
>
> I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
> can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
> batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
imagemagick's "convert" command will convert one. To convert
the whole set,
I 100 bmp files. I installed gimp and imagemagik, but
can't find the way to convert 100 bmp files to jpeg in
batch fashion. Do you know the command? Thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Mustafa Golam wrote:
> We are working for a finger print validation system.
> We have taken NFIS as our base.
> We need some bmp/ppm/jpeg/pbm to wsq/nist2000 file format changer.
> any link or Free program will be quit help full.
> any doc to converter program or specification o
We are working for a finger print validation
system.
We have taken NFIS as our base.
We need some bmp/ppm/jpeg/pbm to wsq/nist2000 file
format changer.
any link or Free program will be quit help
full.
any doc to converter program or specification of
wsq/nist 2000 file fomat and other image
We are working for a finger print validation system.
We want to work on the work done by NIST.
But we need bmp/jpeg/ppm/pmp to wsq/nist2000 file format changer.
We want to use cwsq,mindtct,bozoth3 program and working to make a gui.
any help will be boosting for us..
we are hanging this point
I am attempting to use OOWriter to open and edit a Word document that
contains a small JPEG image. When the page display comes up in a box
where the picture should be. It tells me exactly what is wrong, but I
don't know what to do to fix the problem. It says:
"QuickTime and a
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 08:28 pm, YH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, I am new to debian, where can I found jpeg package from the 8
> CDs? I've read the FAQ, seems the command to install a binary package
> is "dpkg -i libjpeg", is it right?
>
> Thank you in a
Hello,
Sorry, I am new to debian, where can I found jpeg package from the 8
CDs? I've read the FAQ, seems the command to install a binary package is
"dpkg -i libjpeg", is it right?
Thank you in advance.
Peace.
Yuja
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Thanks Icebiker. Good suggestion. I'll give it a try.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1500x1000 pixels.
I have to say, I've only tried it once.
/icebiker
- Original Message -
From: "Tong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 14:31
Subject: Re: OT, dvd player playable jpeg pictures
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:51
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:51:21 -0400, Icebiker wrote:
> I was able to play jpegs on my dvd player (a Koss cheapie), using a data CD
> created on Windows.
Yeah, data cd, that's what I was talking about.
> Not all dvd players support playing dvds, you want to read the box real
> closely before you
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 19:46
Subject: OT, dvd player playable jpeg pictures
Hi,
Anybody know what kind of jpeg pictures are playable in normal dvd player?
I burned some, but it seems that DVD players are very picky about the
pictures they can show.
My DVD
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:00:52 +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
>> Anybody know what kind of jpeg pictures are playable in normal dvd player?
>>
>> I burned some, but it seems that DVD players are very picky about the
>> pictures they can show.
>>
>> My DVD player
Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody know what kind of jpeg pictures are playable in normal dvd player?
>
> I burned some, but it seems that DVD players are very picky about the
> pictures they can show.
>
> My DVD player manual can't help m
Hi,
Anybody know what kind of jpeg pictures are playable in normal dvd player?
I burned some, but it seems that DVD players are very picky about the
pictures they can show.
My DVD player manual can't help me with this. I've looked everywhere, but
didn't find any relev
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:50:07AM +0100, ??yvind A. Holm wrote:
> On 2004-02-24 02:20-0800 Nano Nano wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I need any program for make a 'mpeg' or 'av
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 01:39:50PM +0200, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> >-mf on is deprecated, use mf://files instead
> >Exiting... (error parsing cmdline)
>
> Do you understand what is the problem???
Yes. Unfortunately, the syntax changed between 0.9 and 1.0pre.
I use the command:
mencoder "mf://*
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:09:05AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:50:07AM +0100, ?yvind A. Holm wrote:
> >
> > I got very good results by using
> >
> > http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net/
> >
>
> Strange, because Mplayer *uses* ffmpeg. Sounds fishy.
Well not really. By defaul
Nano Nano wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
Hello
I need any program for make a 'mpeg' or 'avi' movie from 'jpeg'
pictures. Do you
people know some program for do it?
Thanks
Gustavo
--
http://www.mplayerhq
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:50:07AM +0100, Øyvind A. Holm wrote:
>
> I got very good results by using
>
> http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net/
>
Strange, because Mplayer *uses* ffmpeg. Sounds fishy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On 2004-02-24 02:20-0800 Nano Nano wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I need any program for make a 'mpeg' or 'avi' movie from 'jpeg'
> > pictures. Do you people know some program
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> Hello
>
> I need any program for make a 'mpeg' or 'avi' movie from 'jpeg'
> pictures. Do you
> people know some program for do it?
>
> Thanks
> Gustavo
>
Hello
I need any program for make a 'mpeg' or 'avi' movie from 'jpeg'
pictures. Do you
people know some program for do it?
Thanks
Gustavo
--
Regards.
gustavo halperin
_
Laboratory for Computer Graphics and CAD
Fac
ograms to manipulate various image formats
(JPEG, TIFF, PhotoCD, PBM, XPM, etc...). All manipulations can
be achieved through shell commands as well as through a X11 graphical
interface (display).
.
Possible effects: colormap manipulation, channel operations, thumbnail
creation, image annotation
> I have the first 93 JPEG images from the new digital camera on my hard
> drive. The gimp will load an image and print it perfectly. I see it
> also has an option to create a thumbnail of an image. What I would like
> is an album of thumbnails of all 93 images with the ability
On Monday 31 March 2003 08:13 pm, Leo Spalteholz wrote:
> In case you are using KDE, go to the directory that has your
> pictures in it and hit CTRL-I. That'll bring up a dialog of
> options for your gallery and then generates a gallery style
> webpage that you can save.
One big thing wrong with
On March 31, 2003 12:44 pm, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:30:07 +0200, Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
> > I have the first 93 JPEG images from the new digital camera on my
> > hard drive. The gimp will load an image and print it perfectly.
> > I see it also ha
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:30:07 +0200, Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
> I have the first 93 JPEG images from the new digital camera on my hard
> drive. The gimp will load an image and print it perfectly. I see it
> also has an option to create a thumbnail of an image. What I would like
>
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
