Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:21:20PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote: > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > like to install Debian. > > I've found one very slim image of that, which ran with

Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 02:08:58AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:22 PM Michael Jinks > wrote: > > > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > > like to i

Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:22 PM Michael Jinks wrote: > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > like to install Debian. > > I've found one very slim image of that, which ran without issue,

Re: Network setup on Raspberry Pi

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:21:20PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote: > I have a Pi 4 machine where I've installed two OS's, the "house supplied", > and Ubuntu, both worked fine so I'm sure the hardware is good. Now I'd > like to install Debian. > > I've found one very slim image of that, which ran with

Re: Network setup by installer

[Some rampant snipping, I'm afraid. Hope that is ok.] On Thu 01 Feb 2018 at 09:41:36 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 01 Feb 2018 at 10:55:35 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > > > Intended to do what? > > > > To leave the user without network connectivity after first boot? There > > are at leas

Re: Network setup by installer

On Thu 01 Feb 2018 at 10:55:35 (+), Brian wrote: > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 20:05:17 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 23:13:52 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian w

Re: Network setup by installer

On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 20:05:17 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 23:13:52 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher

Re: Network setup by installer

On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 23:13:52 (+), Brian wrote: > On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote

Re: Network setup by installer

On Wed 31 Jan 2018 at 12:29:38 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher w

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 (+), Brian wrote: > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > So, I return to the essential question, which I led w

Re: Network setup by installer

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 10:59:31AM +, Brian wrote: > > The technique just replaces installing over a wireless link from the > start. I've been wondering why you chose not to do that and avoid the > extra work. Sorry for the delay in replying. An early draft of one of my previous mails in thi

Re: Network setup by installer

On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 12:18:45 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 15:21:31 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:27:22 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > With wireless, there's no real equivalent to the wire > > > being connected. Even when installed and configured

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 15:21:31 (+), Brian wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:27:22 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: >

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 19:09:27 +, Brian wrote: > On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > To get out of the situation I'm in on those two machines, I just need to > > hand-craft the interfaces file to something like what you have above, > > with appropriate device, s

Re: Network setup by installer

On Sat 20 Jan 2018 at 03:25:00 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So, I return to the essentia

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:33:23PM +, Brian wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > > > > So, I return to the essential question, which I led with in my original > > post, which is which meth

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 08:27:22 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > Hello the list > > > > > > > > Can anyone point me at do

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > > > It is unclear to me why you can't configure the wireless interface using ssh > > through the wired interface? > > Thanks for replying. I am not sure what problem you are

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri 19 Jan 2018 at 22:10:39 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > Hello the list > > > > > > Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up > > > network interfaces, out

Re: Network setup by installer

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:43:10AM +0100, john doe wrote: > On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > Hello the list > > > > Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up > > network interfaces, out of the several ways there are to do it? > > > > I've done a couple of in

Re: Network setup by installer

On 1/19/2018 12:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: Hello the list Can anyone point me at documentation of how the installer sets up network interfaces, out of the several ways there are to do it? I've done a couple of installs of Stretch, one when it was still testing and one recently, on different ha

Re: network setup

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:14:57PM +, Brian wrote: > On Wed 14 Dec 2016 at 14:03:09 +0100, David Jardine wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > When I ran machines containing two identical ethernet cards, it > > > was lucky dip as to w

Re: network setup

f the art. On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Erwan David wrote: Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 02:49:24 From: Erwan David To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:49:43 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:08:01PM

Re: network setup

2016 07:55:26 From: Brian To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:55:43 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org If all you want is a single wireless connection which is activated when the machine boots you do not need a

Re: network setup

On Wed 14 Dec 2016 at 14:03:09 +0100, David Jardine wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > [...] > > > > When I ran machines containing two identical ethernet cards, it > > was lucky dip as to which card got which name. That alone would > > have made the new meth

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: [...] > > When I ran machines containing two identical ethernet cards, it > was lucky dip as to which card got which name. That alone would > have made the new method far preferable, had it been available at > the time. But don't entri

Re: network setup

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 11:33:21 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > David's answer illustrated my point so beautifully that i had to > say thanks. What point??? Lisi

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:14:30AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 09:13:49 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > >

Re: network setup

On Wednesday 14 December 2016 09:13:49 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > > > Eh? How does calling something by the string "wlx00c0ca364bd2" instead > > of "wlan0" make it less acces

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote: [...] > Eh? How does calling something by the string "wlx00c0ca364bd2" instead > of "wlan0" make it less accessible? Thank you! You just highlighted why I'm not staying for long in that d

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:08:01PM CET, Greg Wooledge said: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:02:45PM +, Brian wrote: > > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > > > Do you think eno167778 will be more useful than eth0 to a new user ? > > > My God, why must I use eno167778, he

Re: network setup

On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 21:52:15 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:44:39PM +, Brian wrote: > > [...] > > > For someone who has been using Debian for many years the position you > > expound is understandable and viable to support [...] > > > But remember new users; d

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:02:45PM +, Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > > Do you think eno167778 will be more useful than eth0 to a new user ? > My God, why must I use eno167778, he will say? I must change > this to something I like. connection0 looks g

Re: network setup

On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > Le 12/13/2016 à 20:44, Brian a écrit : > > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >>> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/So

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:44:39PM +, Brian wrote: [...] > For someone who has been using Debian for many years the position you > expound is understandable and viable to support [...] > But remember new users; does it really matter to them? The

Re: network setup

Le 12/13/2016 à 20:44, Brian a écrit : > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ >>> lists three options:

Re: network setup

On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: > > [...] > > > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ > > lists three options: > > Thanks! For someone who has been using

Re: network setup

That is one network access point, yes. However, where I am, I get about 10 of those, and must then read down to ESSID: to find the name. Each access point grouping starts with Cell 0? so by skipping to each new Cell number, I can find the next access point to verify if it is mine. -- Charlie Kra

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +, Darac Marjal wrote: [...] > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ > lists three options: Thanks! regards - -- t -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.

Re: network setup

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:18:11PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 07:43:06PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to wlx00c0ca364bd2 for some reason. This is (somewhat ironically) called a "predictable interface name"

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 07:43:06PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to > wlx00c0ca364bd2 for some reason. This is (somewhat ironically) called a "predictable interface name". I don't know whet

Re: network setup

If all you want is a single wireless connection which is activated when the machine boots you do not need a wpa_supplicant.conf. Everything can be done in /etc/network/interfaces. It is the simplest, most hassle-free and most straightforward way to proceed. First check that network-manager is not

Re: network setup

rian wrote: Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:42:01 From: Brian To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:42:18 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sun 11 Dec 2016 at 19:43:06 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: I tried manual network configu

Re: network setup

ec 2016 19:43:06 From: Jude DaShiell To: Charlie Kravetz , debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:43:25 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to wlx00c0ca364bd2 for som

Re: network setup

On Sun 11 Dec 2016 at 19:43:06 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I tried manual network configuration and debian renamed wlan0 to > wlx00c0ca364bd2 for some reason. If I do ip a that shows up as possible > wifi connection. Unfortunately ifup doesn't recognize that device name. It is unclear (to me,

Re: network setup

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Charlie Kravetz wrote: Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:47:08 From: Charlie Kravetz To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: network setup Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:35:08 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA2

Re: network setup

On Sun 11 Dec 2016 at 10:47:08 -0800, Charlie Kravetz wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:13:33 -0500 (EST) > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > >When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into > >/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the > >documentation but a new file.

Re: network setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:13:33 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote: >When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into >/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the >documentation but a new file. The first line said net

Re: network setup

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > When I used wpa_passphrase I put about 5 lines into > /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf which wasn't the original from the > documentation but a new file. The first line said network= and that was > all. For a wifi connection,

Re: network setup for xen on a laptop

Henning Follmann, 7.02.2014: > Hello, > I just setup a laptop for development. > I usually have multiple XEN instances for development purposes. My previous > setup was a desktop with e static ethernet setup. that was fairly easy. > I had one iface br0 instance in my /etc/network/interfaces > > W

Re: network setup for xen on a laptop

For laptops you need two networks. A nat network and a host only network. On Feb 7, 2014 5:51 AM, "Henning Follmann" wrote: > Hello, > I just setup a laptop for development. > I usually have multiple XEN instances for development purposes. My previous > setup was a desktop with e static ethernet

Re: network setup question

Hi, Miles: On Thursday 06 May 2010 14:12:56 Miles Fidelman wrote: > Thanks to all who replied. I'm starting to zero in on this now. > > A few more details: > > To follow up with a few more details: > > server1 -- hub (switch) --- server 2 > > > datacenter's router > > The

Re: network setup question

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Thanks to all who replied.  I'm starting to zero in on this now. > > A few more details: > [snip] > > on server 1: > eth0: inet addr:207.154.13.48  Bcast:207.154.13.63  Mask:255.255.255.224 > (first netblock) > server1:/home/milesf# route >

Re: network setup question

Thanks to all who replied. I'm starting to zero in on this now. A few more details: To follow up with a few more details: server1 -- hub (switch) --- server 2 | | datacenter's router The hub is a basic $40 gigE switch (not swi

Re: network setup question

Anand Sivaram wrote: On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 06:36, Miles Fidelman mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>> wrote: Are you using static IP or using dhcp? If you are using static, then you could try your local netmask from 255

Re: network setup question

On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 01:05 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: > On 5/6/2010 12:05 AM, Alex Samad wrote: > > [snip] > > What am I missing? nothing in your case it work, but they are supposed to be hosts in different networks. Which was the point I was trying to get at. And to be carefully - especially i

Re: network setup question

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 13:35, Kevin Ross wrote: > On 5/6/2010 12:05 AM, Alex Samad wrote: > >> >> well think about it, if we are talking about network 192.168.11.0/24 >> (for my example I will use 24 instead of 27) >> >> the server would have an address 192.168.11.55/24 (for example) and the >> r

Re: network setup question

On 5/6/2010 12:05 AM, Alex Samad wrote: well think about it, if we are talking about network 192.168.11.0/24 (for my example I will use 24 instead of 27) the server would have an address 192.168.11.55/24 (for example) and the router would have 192.168.11.1/24 if I change the netmask of the ser

Re: network setup question

>if I change the netmask of the server it can no longer talk to the >router because it is in a different ip network ie 192.168.11.55/22 can't >talk to 192.168.11.1/24 (you can fake it on linux with iproute - see my >other answer to this thread). That does not look correct. Just to see how it work

Re: network setup question

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 22:25 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: > On 5/5/2010 9:11 PM, Alex Samad wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:55 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: > > > >> On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >> > > [snip] > > > > > >>> - I have two network /27 network blocks that are NO

Re: network setup question

On 5/5/2010 9:11 PM, Alex Samad wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:55 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: [snip] - I have two network /27 network blocks that are NOT contiguous - I use one for each box I'm not a networking expert, but this

Re: network setup question

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:55 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote: > On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: [snip] > > - I have two network /27 network blocks that are NOT contiguous - I > > use one for each box > > > > I'm not a networking expert, but this part seems wrong to me. I don't > think you'r

Re: network setup question

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 21:06 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Not sure if this is the right list, sort of a general linux networking > question (pointers to a more appropriate list welcomed) > > Setup: > > - I have two servers in a datacenter, currently used for different things > > - I have

Re: network setup question

On 5/5/2010 6:06 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: Not sure if this is the right list, sort of a general linux networking question (pointers to a more appropriate list welcomed) Setup: - I have two servers in a datacenter, currently used for different things - I have one gigE cable coming in from

Re: network setup question

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 06:36, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Not sure if this is the right list, sort of a general linux networking > question (pointers to a more appropriate list welcomed) > > Setup: > > - I have two servers in a datacenter, currently used for different things > > - I have one gigE

Re: Network Setup Help

On Mon, 16 May 2005 21:50:18 +0200, Donald Perkovich wrote: > I installed Debian 3.0r4 onto a machine yesterday and things seemed to > go alright. When I started the machine up today, I found I have no > networking. OK, let's try to figure out what's wrong. > There are two NICs but no device

Re: Network Setup Help

Donald Perkovich wrote: > Hello. > > I installed Debian 3.0r4 onto a machine yesterday and things seemed to > go alright. When I started the machine up today, I found I have no > networking. There are two NICs but no device nodes for them. They > were there yesterday. One I am not using yet an

Re: Network Setup Help

the drivers are not loaded. you can install the discover program to help or you can load all network drivers and see which ones are in use after you modprobe them all 1) cd /lib/modules//kernel/drivers/net 2) for module in `ls *.o`; do modprobe "`echo $module| sed -e 's/\.o//'`"; done 3) lsmod (l

Re: Network setup problems

Ogya Chief wrote: > On the linux box, if I try to ping the Win2K laptop, I get the following: > > PING laptop.network.home (192.168.0.5): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Operation not permitted > ping: wrote laptop.network.home 64 chars, ret=-1 > > On the Win2K machine, the following is what I get

Re: Network setup problems

From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I doubt it; have you tried pinging by address instead of by name? This "feels" like a problem with Windows; do you have a firewall on the W2K laptop? It might be blocking ping traffic. I'd pop a Knoppix CD into the W2K box and see if it works correctly on the

Re: Network setup problems

Ogya Chief wrote: From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So your Win2K laptop gets the 0.5 address when connected to your home LAN? And your Linux server has the address of 0.1? Correct Can you ping localhost? Do you have other machines on the network you can ping? What's the result of "ifconfig"?

Re: Network setup problems

From: Nayyar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Nayyar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> what seems to me ,is that you have duplicate ip's on both linux and win2k machine . as you say "also I have the same entries in the host file on win2k" if my guess is wrong please supply full detail of your linux and

Re: Network setup problems

From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network setup problems Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:47:45 -0500 So your Win2K laptop gets the 0.5 address when connected to your home LAN? And your Linux server has the address of 0.1? Correct Can you ping localhost? Do yo

Re: Network setup problems

Ogya Chief wrote: I have a Win2K laptop with a full computer name like henry.workdomain.com and a domain name like workdomain.com. This gets assigned an automatic ip address anytime I log onto the work network. I have a small linux network at home and I wanted to setup samba to be able to use the l

Re: Network setup problems

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:34:01 +0200, Ogya Chief <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a Win2K laptop with a full computer name like henry.workdomain.com > and a domain name like workdomain.com. This gets assigned an automatic ip > address anytime I log onto the work network. > > I have a

Re: Network setup problems

Thanks Pigeon, I think it will be the trial and error method for ethernet irq over next couple of days. But since I'm not used to running modprobe I want to do a little reading before I start experimenting with this. Ken Pigeon wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:06AM -0500, Ken Januski wrot

Re: Network setup problems

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:06AM -0500, Ken Januski wrote: > Pigeon, > > Thanks again for all your work on this. I'm still not successful but > will keep investigating it later today when I get back from work. As > noted below all attempts to change irq of modem with setserial ended up > wit

Re: Network setup problems

Pigeon, Thanks again for all your work on this. I'm still not successful but will keep investigating it later today when I get back from work. As noted below all attempts to change irq of modem with setserial ended up with a hung pc. I want to research modprobe a bit before trying it. The onl

Re: Network setup problems

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:29:22PM -0500, Ken Januski wrote: > > Pigeon, > > Thanks for your input. My answers are below: > > >> > >>I've been experimenting wth changing settings in serial.conf but have > >>had no luck. Though dmesg says that a modem is found at ttys00 with an > >>irq of 4 set

Re: Network setup problems

Added note: I was able to find the key (F2) to get to the bios and couldn't find anything there on modem , ethernet card or interrupts. The only thing that seemed close was the option to set Serial to Auto. I left that as it was. Ken Ken Januski wrote: Pigeon, Thanks for your input. My answ

Re: Network setup problems

Pigeon, Thanks for your input. My answers are below: I've been experimenting wth changing settings in serial.conf but have had no luck. Though dmesg says that a modem is found at ttys00 with an irq of 4 setting that in serial.conf results in a hanging modem. I keep having to set it to ttys0 wi

Re: Network setup problems

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:48:55AM -0500, Ken Januski wrote: > Pigeon wrote: > >Your /proc/interrupts output shows irq 3 being allocated to "serial", > >which is probably the serial port being used for your modem, which > >probably explains why ppp is involved in the conflict. > > > >Rather than tr

Re: Network setup problems

Thanks Pigeon, I've been experimenting wth changing settings in serial.conf but have had no luck. Though dmesg says that a modem is found at ttys00 with an irq of 4 setting that in serial.conf results in a hanging modem. I keep having to set it to ttys0 with irq of 3. I'm really unclear about h

Re: Network setup problems

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:02:02PM -0800, Kevin Bailey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:00:19PM -0500, Ken Januski wrote: > > > > I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and > > same time but at least I'm headed back in the right direction. > > >From your earlier du

Re: Network setup problems

After doing a little research on Google it does look like interrupts with that nic aren't unheard of. So I'll see what I can find out about resolving irq conflicts. But I don't expect any quick answers on my own so if anyone has any ideas on how to change the irq I'd appreciate it. Ken Kevin B

Re: Network setup problems

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:00:19PM -0500, Ken Januski wrote: > > I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and > same time but at least I'm headed back in the right direction. >From your earlier dumps, it does look indeed like the ethernet card is fighting over irq 3 and

Re: Network setup problems (formerly Can anyone give me a clue)

Ken Januski declaimed: > I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and > same time but at least I'm headed back in the right direction. > > I continue to get "Can't get terminal parameters: input/output error" > when trying to run pon with ethernet up. Disclaimer: I don'

Re: Network setup problems (formerly Can anyone give me a clue)

No, it couldn't be so simple. BUT IT IS!! Sure enough I forgot that I'd turned on the XP firewall. Once I turned it off I was able to ping the XP machine. Thanks for pointing that out! I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and same time but at least I'm headed back

Re: Network setup problems (formerly Can anyone give me a clue)

Thanks Stephen, Here's the output of most of what you asked for. lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: I

Re: Network setup problems (formerly Can anyone give me a clue)

Ken Januski wrote: Hi, I'm starting this thread over from one that used to be called "Can anyone give me a clue..." . Sorry for anyone that was trying to help me with that thread. I'm thankful for your help but feel I need to rephrase the problem. First of all I have a crossover cable connec

Re: Network setup problems (formerly Can anyone give me a clue)

Ken Januski wrote: Hi, I'm starting this thread over from one that used to be called "Can anyone give me a clue..." . Sorry for anyone that was trying to help me with that thread. I'm thankful for your help but feel I need to rephrase the problem. First of all I have a crossover cable connect

Re: Network setup

Hi Many thanks for all the advice. The cause of the problem was a typing error, writng 82 as 83. I only spotted this when a preparing a reply. Many thanks Simon Monique Y. Herman wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 at 20:42 GMT, Simon Windsor penned: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -

Re: Network setup

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 at 20:42 GMT, Simon Windsor penned: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_00CF_01C395C0.BFEE97D0 Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi > > I have relocated a server from within a f

Re: Network setup

Sorry about that Paul...I meant to send that to the list :P Anywhoo, do you have your gateway specified correctly? What happens when you type 'route' as root? --- Paul William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is the output of ifconfig and what are the ip > addresses of the > other machines on th

Re: Network setup

On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:42:38PM +0100, Simon Windsor wrote: > FTP, ssh and ping all report > > No route to host. > > Any ideas ? Wild guess here, but what is the output of /sbin/route. Bijan -- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.crasseux.com signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Network setup

what is the output of ifconfig and what are the ip addresses of the other machines on the network with the server? On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:42, Simon Windsor wrote: > Hi > > I have relocated a server from within a firewalled environment on a > 192.168.0 network, to an external network. > > Unf

Re: network setup script ??

On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Ron Rademaker wrote: > 2. Get the eth0 interface 'up' using ifconfig ( command = > ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST} ). Check > the files /etc/init.d/networking and /etc/network/interfaces. > 3. Add a route: route add -net $

Re: network setup script ??

I don't know if you can do network setup again, but I can tell you what you'll have to do to get the network working. 1. Make sure the nerwork card is recognised and the drivers are installed (duh!). 2. Get the eth0 interface 'up' using ifconfig ( command = ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMA

Re: network setup script ??

> But now id like to set his networking up, what script do i run ??. Is it > on the system or only on the install floppies. > I dont know enough about the network setup to do it from the ground up, > i can fix it :) when its there ( ussually ). > i don't know, where the initial setup script is. tr

Re: network setup

hi I think you are looking for: server# ifconfig eth0:1 10.1.1.10 server# route add -host 10.1.1.0 eth0:1 other# ifconfig eth0:1 10.1.1.11 other# route add -host 10.1.1.0 eth0:1 --- other# ifconfig -v eth0:1Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:10.3.1.1

  1   2   >