On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:02:45PM +0000, Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 20:48:46 +0100, Erwan David wrote: > > Do you think eno167778 will be more useful than eth0 to a new user ?
> My God, why must I use eno167778, he will say? I must change > this to something I like. connection0 looks good. > > And so he can. So where's the problem? A new user isn't even going to see it. As long as the Internet connection works, why would they bother to look at the interface names?