Le 12/13/2016 à 20:44, Brian a écrit : > On Tue 13 Dec 2016 at 14:40:47 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:36:05PM +0000, Darac Marjal wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ >>> lists three options: >> >> Thanks! > > For someone who has been using Debian for many years the position you > expound is understandable and viable to support. Someone who is used to > eth0 and wlan0 for interface names is bound to sit up and take notice > when they change to something which is strange and doesn't exactly stick > in the memory. > > But remember new users; does it really matter to them? They have no > personal history to point to. As you point out, the engineering > advantages are unarguable. And after all, there are three options which > can be employed to get something you are not given. That's not bad as > things go. >
Do you think eno167778 will be more useful than eth0 to a new user ? (yes I've seen the name for the only NIC of a machine)
