On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 02:11:05PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
> At the end of upgrade of a testing, I get this message :
> Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.23-4) ...
> dpkg: warning: package not in database at line 1: pulseaudio-module-udev:amd64
> dpkg: warning: found unknown packages; this m
AFAIK both postgres and mysql have command line driven programs which
are quite powerfull.
have you tried them?
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:51:32 -0500, Bradley Pursley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a non-X windows dependent database management program?
> I need a program th
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:36:24AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> This is really old, but it's straight up my alley, so...
>
> on Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 07:08:39PM -0600, Christopher L. Everett ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I do a lot of database work. Sometimes I must do massive batch jobs on
This is really old, but it's straight up my alley, so...
on Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 07:08:39PM -0600, Christopher L. Everett ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I do a lot of database work. Sometimes I must do massive batch jobs on
> my box
> such as:
>
> -- multi-gigabyte database dumps and restores
Glenn Meehan wrote:
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 11:51, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
So, what kind of hard drive subsystem can I run that would get me
3 to 4 times the performance that wouldn't break the bank?
Which file system are you using?
I find the performance of ext2 superior to that of ext
At 2004-04-04T14:54:08Z, Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:42:27 -0600
> Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Not really. Concurrent mirrored reads can be significantly faster than
>> striped reads, since each drive can be servicing a complete read request
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 21:28:16 -0600
"Christopher L. Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just read an email of the Linux kernel list saying that Linux software
>
> RAID
> kicks the ass of most hardware raid solutions.
Do you have a pointer to that email? Does that email include
benchmarking
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:42:27 -0600
Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2004-04-04T05:20:43Z, "Christopher L. Everett"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > substitute raid 0 (striping) for raid 1, and that last makes sense.
>
> Not really. Concurrent mirrored reads can be significantly f
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 11:51, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> So, what kind of hard drive subsystem can I run that would get me
> 3 to 4 times the performance that wouldn't break the bank?
Which file system are you using?
I find the performance of ext2 superior to that of ext3.
Glenn
--
To U
First thing is I have no experience at all with SCSI, so I'll only talk
about IDE.
Hardware raid is 'easier' as you don't have to load any driver in
booting process. Anyway, there are few pure IDE hardware raids (most
need a driver to properly work) and are a bit more expensive than the
others. Wi
At 2004-04-04T05:20:43Z, "Christopher L. Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> substitute raid 0 (striping) for raid 1, and that last makes sense.
Not really. Concurrent mirrored reads can be significantly faster than
striped reads, since each drive can be servicing a complete read request
simu
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
>>1) Dedicate a second hard drive to the database files
> I'm not sure that would be a huge win, since the performance would just
> be that of another IDE drive.
No, not huge, but it does mean that the rest of the system won't be stealing
disk I/O from your database
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
IIRC, RAID 1 gives the best performance under all conditions :),
though it's
not terribly safe.
substitute raid 0 (striping) for raid 1, and that last makes sense.
--
Christopher L. Everett
Chief Technology Officer www.medbanner.com
Me
Adam Aube wrote:
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
So, what kind of hard drive subsystem can I run that would get me
3 to 4 times the performance that wouldn't break the bank?
Define "break the bank". The more money you're willing to sink into this,
the better performance you can get. A few opti
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
>>>Am I correct in thinking that the bottleneck lies in the HD subsystem?
>>Yes.
> So, what kind of hard drive subsystem can I run that would get me
> 3 to 4 times the performance that wouldn't break the bank?
Define "break the bank". The more money you're willing
Adam Aube wrote:
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
The problem is that these things often take 10 to 30 minutes to run on
my box. When I use the GNU time utility, I see a low PCPU number,
typically between 15 and 25%. CPU utilization viewed through top remains
at 35% or so, and I never go deeper
Kent West wrote:
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
Hi,
I do a lot of database work. Sometimes I must do massive batch jobs
on my box
such as:
-- multi-gigabyte database dumps and restores
-- tests over millions of records, searching for overlooked cases
-- one-off queries for sales & marketing
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> I do a lot of database work. Sometimes I must do massive batch jobs on
> my box
> The problem is that these things often take 10 to 30 minutes to run on
> my box. When I use the GNU time utility, I see a low PCPU number,
> typically between 15 and 25%. CPU utiliz
Christopher L. Everett wrote:
Hi,
I do a lot of database work. Sometimes I must do massive batch jobs
on my box
such as:
-- multi-gigabyte database dumps and restores
-- tests over millions of records, searching for overlooked cases
-- one-off queries for sales & marketing typs that join 8
The spreadsheet "tsiag" the console version of siag spreadsheet from
the Siag Office Suite might fit your needs, I use it for my bookkeeping
applications. It will save your data in a variety of formats and
has minimal memory needs.
A simple but fast database I use is NoSql, a flat
file dat
I don't know about memory usage, but I think MySQL will work for you...
Ron Rademaker
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm looking for some sort of database or spreadsheet application to use
> as a personal filing system. I'll be organizing a lot of different
> things that I own
Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>
> maybe you can use a binary editor to see the control fields it's puting in
> your file. (vim -b your_file)
Never used one of these. Thanks, maybe these will help.
> I also think the dos2unix utility might solve your prob
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, John Foster wrote:
>
> system, however when I select the delimiter (tab) and export it, the
> file that is ported to Linux has extra visible quotation {"xx"}
> marks around each field. If there are extra not visible line controls
maybe you can use a binary editor to see
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
> No, ASCII is ASCII, no matter what platform you're on. The only
> difference is that on DOS/Windows, ASCII lines are terminated with 2
> characters, the newline and carriage return. On Linux/Unix, only one of
> these is used. You can use the dos2unix program (from th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, John Foster wrote:
> online ordering system). I want to be able to edit and manipulat these
> files in Linux, Debian Slink. I think the problem that I have is that
> the windows ascii text format is somehow different from that used in
> Linu
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 10:39:53AM +, Patrick Colbeck wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to make a small multi user database but am not a programmer so I
> don't know C. I have found mysql and the xmysql administration program and
> it looks like I could get my head arround creating the actual database
>
Rick Knebel hat gesagt: // Rick Knebel wrote:
> Hi,
> I use access at work for some really simple database work. Is
> there anything in linux I could start using so i can be using one less
> app in NT.
>
> I know there is nothing real similiar but maybe a little bit alike.
>
> Most of the databas
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi All.
> > I'd DEARLY love to get Linux established on my university campus, but
> >one of the stumbling blocks is that one of our major apps is based on an
> >SQLServer 6.5 database runnin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi All.
> I'd DEARLY love to get Linux established on my university campus, but
>one of the stumbling blocks is that one of our major apps is based on an
>SQLServer 6.5 database running on an NT Server. The clients are all
>Win95
> "Kent" == Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kent> Organization: Abilene Christian University
Kent> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.34 i586)
Kent> Okay. I found the pgsql file (although I wonder why locate didn't find
Kent> it, even after I did an updatedb). Still, since I
Kent West wrote:
>
> Hi All.
> I'd DEARLY love to get Linux established on my university campus, but
> one of the stumbling blocks is that one of our major apps is based on an
> SQLServer 6.5 database running on an NT Server. The clients are all
> Win95/98/NT based. Is there anyway for me to conn
Carlos Marcos Kakihara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I'm looking for some database manager that looks like
: SyBase. Is there one avaliable for Linux? If possible, a Debian
: package.
There is PostgreSQL, an Object Oriented RDBMS. It's in the misc
section of Hamm (it's 100% free).
You also
At 12:30 PM 1/18/98 -0800, Dave Neuer wrote:
>I am having problems getting the DBI drivers for mSQL working on my
>Debian Linux 1.3.1 system. I am using mSQL 2.0.3, DBI 0.91, and
>Msql-modules-1.1814.
Concerning the DBI problems, I have no advice; I use Msql.pm rather than
the DBI interface for t
On Sat, Nov 22, 1997 at 12:21:39PM -0500, Shaleh wrote:
> At work on our BSDI boxes we use mysql. Seems rock solid and I believe
> has a GPL type license.
It's GPL + pay money if you produce a product based on mysql.
Unfortunately, this makes it non-free as far as Debian is concerned.
For most pe
At work on our BSDI boxes we use mysql. Seems rock solid and I believe
has a GPL type license.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>Does anyone have any experience specifically with Lotus Approach
>and any of these servers?
if you can't get a free version :
there is www.openlink.com with a commercial odbc server
(map any odbc or udbc client to any database, has support for
postgres95 (and a free 2 client version for postgres9
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Other options are, TTBOMK, Postgres (which has PostODBC,
> but is only a development version which is a year old; I have it
> here to try out later today), and mSQL, for which I can't exactly
> find the ODBC driver.
The ODBC driver for mSQL is cal
37 matches
Mail list logo
