On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 21:28:16 -0600 "Christopher L. Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just read an email of the Linux kernel list saying that Linux software > > RAID > kicks the ass of most hardware raid solutions.
Do you have a pointer to that email? Does that email include
benchmarking numbers, or a pointer to sam? I find it hard to believe
that using the kernel's RAID features blows past "most hardware RAID
solutions."
It *is* the case that Linux software RAID provides better performance
than cheap ATA-based RAID cards like those from Promise and Highpoint
(which sometimes are included on motherboards these days). However,
that's because those cards are not really hardware RAID, despite the
confusing terminology they use. They're really software RAID solutions,
and the processing for them has to be done by the kernel anyway.
But if someone has performance numbers indicating that Linux software
RAID consistently outperforms real hardware RAID solutions, including
for a db server under load, I'd really be interested in seeing that.
>>Regarding RAID, I believe 0+1 gives the best performance, but it
>>requires 4 disks. RAID 5 and 0 also will give a performance boost, and
>>require at least 3 and 2 disks, respectively.
>
> IIRC, RAID 1 gives the best performance under all conditions :), though
> it's not terribly safe.
Hence the use of 0+1, intended to give you safety + fast performance,
without (if you're using software RAID) the computational overhead
of RAID 5.
> So here asre some of the lower cost options I'm considering:
>
> SCSI: a multichannel (3 or 4) U160 or better host adapter and several
> lightly
> used 36GB U160 or better drives, software raid 5.
>
> SATA: a 3Ware SATA controller, and several SATA drives in a hardware
> RAID 5 configuration.
>
> I suspect the first option would run a touch faster.
If you get 4 disks, and you're thinking software RAID, I suggest
benchmarking your system under typical usage to see whether a RAID 5
or a RAID 0+1 solution makes more sense for you. RAID 5 is not always
a win because of additional computational overhead; it depends on what
your usage is.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
