On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:42:27 -0600
Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2004-04-04T05:20:43Z, "Christopher L. Everett"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > substitute raid 0 (striping) for raid 1, and that last makes sense.
> 
> Not really.  Concurrent mirrored reads can be significantly faster than
> striped reads, since each drive can be servicing a complete read request
> simultaneously.

RAID 0 functions the same way.  Consecutive chunks of data alternate
between the disks.

-c

-- 
Chris Metzler                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                (remove "snip-me." to email)

"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to