Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:24 PM loredana wrote: > > Greetings, > > I posted the following message to debian-accessibility and I post it > again as suggested. My mistake. I can't cope with this threading hijacking. As I said in my first post, I do have a serious problem I am trying to solve. I wi

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:01:02PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 > wrote: > > > > > > So for Mr. Hardt, Kerberos doesn't exist. Or he's talking HTTP context > > only. > > > > MS has used Active Directory in some form or other since Win2000, and > AD is basically Kerbe

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 wrote: > > So for Mr. Hardt, Kerberos doesn't exist. Or he's talking HTTP context > only. > MS has used Active Directory in some form or other since Win2000, and AD is basically Kerberos plus LDAP. An AD 'domain' is basically a realm. So yes, all their tech

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:20:29 -0400 Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:33:55 +0200 > Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wro

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:33:55 +0200 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the >>> software deployment reasonably well, but from every

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the > > software deployment reasonably well, but from everything I've read, > > the headaches required to make sure

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:29:04AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Google could evaluate the non-browser software in use and pass what is > secure and fail the other packages with explanations for the authors of > failed packages [...] I think it's more subtle than that. "Traditional" (i.e. non-Web

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:19:58 > From: to...@tuxteam.de > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 19

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: [...] > I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the > software deployment reasonably well, but from everything I've read, > the headaches required to make sure that major mail operators will > actually accept my mail a

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > >

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:33:52 +0200 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote: > > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't > > implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our > > broader cause of opposing its breakin

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > > [...] > > > I think terming

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote: > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't > implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our > broader cause of opposing its breaking of standards, imposing various > sorts of lock-in, invasions of priv

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > > [...] > > > I think terming

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 [...] > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't > implement OAut

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally. > > > > > > > > > Google's evil come

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > wrote: [...] > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally. > > > > > > Google's evil comes through the backdoor, without making any noise, > > like Wormt

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 + > > loredana wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it > > > seems that google is going to forbit l

Re: webmail and email from command line

ppy. On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, loredana wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:26:53 > From: loredana > To: Jude DaShiell > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line > Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:27:39 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian

Re: webmail and email from command line

Hi Loredana, I agree with other debianers that setting a forward to another email provider for now should be the easiest option. I think it would be a good idea to find an email provider that allows smtp/imap clients, and as far as I know protonmail does it only in Pro version. I know there is po

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:51 PM Jude DaShiell wrote: > Running using 2fa may be possible with non-browser apps if your security > records indicate you ran with what google considers an untrusted app and > google has it listed. You can generate an app-specific password for the > non-browser app

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, loredana wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:02:17 > From: loredana > To: Celejar > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line > Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:03:05 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian-user@lists

Re: webmail and email from command line

First of all, I wish to thank all of you who shared their experience. Be reassured I am taking any constructive suggestion into serious account and exploring more. Then: On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:03 AM Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 +000 > loredana wrote: > > secure applicatio

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 + > loredana wrote: > > ... > > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it > > seems that google is going to forbit less secure application access > > starting November first of

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 + loredana wrote: ... > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it > seems that google is going to forbit less secure application access > starting November first of this year and it is already a pain to use > it now). What is your sourc

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:23:23 +0200 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: ... > Elsewhere, perhaps riseup [1] is an option. It's donation-funded, > so consider throwing some small amount into their hat. > > Cheers > > [1] https://riseup.net/ I think you've mentioned them before, but how seriously should we t

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed 14 Aug 2019 at 12:19:01 (-0600), Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > loredana writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > > > >> [...] > > > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > >

Re: webmail and email from command line

to...@tuxteam.de writes: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 06:02:01PM +, loredana wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >=20 > > > [...] > >=20 > > > Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > > > marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clie

Re: webmail and email from command line

loredana writes: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a solution. > >> Is ch

Re: webmail and email from command line

On 14/08/2019 19:02, loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a solu

Re: webmail and email from command line

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perh

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 06:02:01PM +, loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > > > [...] > > > Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > > marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perha

Re: webmail and email from command line

On 8/14/2019 8:02 PM, loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a s

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > [...] > Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a solution. > Is changing mail provider an option

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 04:24:49PM +, loredana wrote: > Greetings, > > I posted the following message to debian-accessibility and I post it > again suggested. [...] > 'Though I managed to send mail to my gmail account by allowing less > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable

Re: Webmail?

On 02/07/18 00:53, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2018-07-01 hackte Zenaan Harkness in die Tasten: >> And with your self-issued snake oil certs, > > I use "Let's Encrypt"! > > That link doesn't seem to be a good advertisement for how to set up https ... I get an

Re: Webmail?

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 08:02:33PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: On 02.07.2018 14:22, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: there is no php5 in debian stretch. She probably upgraded from jessie, in which case the php5 that she had in jessie remained in

Re: Webmail?

On 02.07.2018 14:22, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> there is no php5 in debian stretch. > > She probably upgraded from jessie, in which case the php5 that she had > in jessie remained in place after the upgrade to stretch. Yes, agree. And as

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 01.07.2018 11:43, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Oi, I see, I have installed Stretch last year and PHP5 was there. > > No. > > there is no php5 in debian stretch. She probably upgraded from jessie, in which case the php5 that she had

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:40:13PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote: > On 01/07/18 21:57, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >> Oh, use https:// and make sure any security is activated in conf.pl. > > > And with your self-issued snake oil certs, make sure you check and > > confirm the cert on each device you wan

Re: Webmail?

On 01.07.2018 11:43, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Oi, I see, I have installed Stretch last year and PHP5 was there. No. > However, it seems the php5 virtualpackage is still in place, > but not the corresponding real package, > which seems to be removed by the Debian Team. there is no php5 in debian

Re: Webmail?

Am 2018-07-01 hackte Zenaan Harkness in die Tasten: > And with your self-issued snake oil certs, I use "Let's Encrypt"! -- Michelle KonzackMiila ITSystems @ TDnet GNU/Linux Developer 00372-54541400

Re: Webmail?

On 01/07/18 21:57, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> Oh, use https:// and make sure any security is activated in conf.pl. > And with your self-issued snake oil certs, make sure you check and > confirm the cert on each device you want to use to access your > webmail server, from your home network, so that

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:57:53AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I know, I am a little bit late, but I use Squirrelmail since more > then 15 years now and had no problems from Woody to Stretch with it. > > I use it even to access my GMail account :-) because then I have > not to bo

Re: Webmail?

Oi, I see, I have installed Stretch last year and PHP5 was there. PHP7 is MOSTLY incompatible with PHP5! However, it seems the php5 virtualpackage is still in place, but not the corresponding real package, which seems to be removed by the Debian Team. Am 2018-07-01 hackte Joe in die Tasten: > On

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 10:57:53 +0300 "Michelle Konzack" wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I know, I am a little bit late, but I use Squirrelmail since more > then 15 years now and had no problems from Woody to Stretch with it. > > I use it even to access my GMail account :-) because then I have > not to both

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 11:22:14 +0300 "Michelle Konzack" wrote: > Am DATE hackte AUTHOR in die Tasten: Joe > > No, stretch doesn't have php5. I've already had to go through loads > > of php, replacing stuff which has been deprecated for a while and > > now no longer exists. > > Ehm what? > > Here

Re: Webmail?

Am DATE hackte AUTHOR in die Tasten: Joe > No, stretch doesn't have php5. I've already had to go through loads of > php, replacing stuff which has been deprecated for a while and now no > longer exists. Ehm what? Here php5 is working properly! I run it on all of my servers. You mean there is no

Re: Webmail?

Hi Joe, I know, I am a little bit late, but I use Squirrelmail since more then 15 years now and had no problems from Woody to Stretch with it. I use it even to access my GMail account :-) because then I have not to bother with those stupid GMail interface and I can do whatever I want. Best is

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 08:25:41AM +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. > > been using dovecot, roundcube, getmail for some time just for home ne

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:41:01 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 > > mick crane wrote: > > > >> On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > >> > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > >> > > >> > I've just spent half an afternoon

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:56:50 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 > > mick crane wrote: > > > >> On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > >> > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > >> > > >> > I've just spent half an afternoon

Re: Webmail?

On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 mick crane wrote: On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > prayer. been using dovecot, roundcube, getmail for some ti

Re: Webmail?

On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 mick crane wrote: On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > prayer. been using dovecot, roundcube, getmail for some ti

Re: Webmail?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:59:50 +0200 Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:04:16PM +0100, Joe wrote: > > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > > prayer. > > > > Roundcube works (allegedly) with

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > > prayer. > > been using dovecot, roundcube, getmail for some time just for home

Re: Webmail?

On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. been using dovecot, roundcube, getmail for some time just for home network. getting sieve to work was a chore for me but I'm not very good at t

Re: Webmail?

On 06/29/2018 04:04 PM, Joe wrote: I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. You probably skipped a couple of steps there. Before prayer, I usually go through head banging, hair pulling, troubleshooting, not to mention copious swearing, then maybe some sleep. The s

Re: Webmail?

Hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:04:16PM +0100, Joe wrote: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. > > Roundcube works (allegedly) with apache. I'm not an expert on apache2, > but as far as I can see, there is an a

Re: Webmail?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 22:42:38 +0200 deloptes wrote: > Joe wrote: > > > Roundcube works (allegedly) with apache. I'm not an expert on > > apache2, but as far as I can see, there is an apache2.conf existing > > and enabled for roundcube, and it leads via an alias to a real > > index.php in the righ

Re: Webmail?

Joe wrote: > Roundcube works (allegedly) with apache. I'm not an expert on apache2, > but as far as I can see, there is an apache2.conf existing and enabled > for roundcube, and it leads via an alias to a real index.php in the > right place. I just get a 404, and I've tried with and without a > tr

Re: WebMail Interface

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:44:24PM +0800, Rod James Bio wrote: > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? any reason for moving away from horde, I am making the slow move towards horde, especially now that dimp has made it int

RE: WebMail Interface

Last time I tried roundcube it had some serious security issues (possible mysql injections). Overall the code quality seemed very unsteady. But maybe this got better in the meantime. > On 08/20/2008 01:53 PM, Lucas Mocellin wrote: > > Nowadays, Atmail is free. > > > > look at atmail.com, this is

Re: WebMail Interface

On 08/20/2008 01:53 PM, Lucas Mocellin wrote: > Nowadays, Atmail is free. > > look at atmail.com, this is a good interface. apparently only as a 'teaser' version that lacks pop-, spam- or maildir-support etc. and does not include a server. [1] It's also not included in debian lenny. Is it reall

Re: WebMail Interface

Guillaume escribió: Rod James Bio a écrit : Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? I'm currently using Roundcube. This is a very nice project ! http://roundcube.net/ For me it is a good project too, but I th

Re: WebMail Interface

Rod James Bio a écrit : > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? > > I'm currently using Roundcube. This is a very nice project ! http://roundcube.net/ Guillaume -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: WebMail Interface

Nowadays, Atmail is free. look at atmail.com, this is a good interface. 2008/8/20 Rod James Bio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a > subje

Re: WebMail Interface

Le Mer 20 août 2008 13:44, Rod James Bio a écrit : > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? > Hi, I installed SquirrelMail for my compagny and for myself, it works fine. I might change for RoundCube later, to offer a better in

Re: webmail for low-end VPS

John K Masters wrote: > Can anyone recommend a webmail app suitable for a low-end VPS. I already > have Postfix/Courier setup. > > It looks like I have three choices: > 1. Squirrelmail > 2. Roundcube > 3. Imp4/Horde > > I have used squirrelmail before and was not impressed but have heard > that I

Re: Webmail that supports UTF-8

Daniel Nilsson wrote: > Hi All, > > Could anyone recommend a webmail client that works with Cyrus IMAP and > that support both reading and replying to messages in UTF-8? I want > UTF-8 support in both the subject and the body. SqWebMail, fast and reliable component from Courier Mail server: http:

Re: Webmail that supports UTF-8

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:29:52PM +0100, Daniel Nilsson wrote: > > > > Chris, > > > > Great suggestion, Horde/IMP works well with my UTF-8 formatted > > messages so this is exactly what I was looking for! After a little > > fi

Re: Webmail that supports UTF-8

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:29:52PM +0100, Daniel Nilsson wrote: > > Chris, > > Great suggestion, Horde/IMP works well with my UTF-8 formatted > messages so this is exactly what I was looking for! After a little > fiddling the Sarge packages were up and running, a little more work > but it was wor

Re: Webmail that supports UTF-8

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +, Chris Boot wrote: > Daniel Nilsson wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >Could anyone recommend a webmail client that works with Cyrus IMAP and > >that support both reading and replying to messages in UTF-8? I want > >UTF-8 support in both the subject and the body. > >

Re: Webmail that supports UTF-8

Daniel Nilsson wrote: Hi All, Could anyone recommend a webmail client that works with Cyrus IMAP and that support both reading and replying to messages in UTF-8? I want UTF-8 support in both the subject and the body. I have tried Phpgroupware and Squirrelmail, none of which seems to be able to

Re: Webmail options in sid

On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Saturday May 28 2005 1:30 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > For the old Horde framework (version 2): > > IMP (mail), Kronolith (calendar), Mnemo (notes), Nag (tasks), Sork > > (account management) and Turba (contacts). > > Now h

Re: Webmail options in sid

On Saturday May 28 2005 1:30 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > For the old Horde framework (version 2): > IMP (mail), Kronolith (calendar), Mnemo (notes), Nag (tasks), Sork > (account management) and Turba (contacts). Now how well does the fancy groupware stuff synch up with Outlook, Kontact, etc?

Re: Webmail options in sid

On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:58:58AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Is there any web mail packages out there that are comparable to mutt or > kmail when it comes to features and functionality? Some of my users can't > set an MUA up on their own... > I am personally a big fan of Horde and IMP. It i

Re: Webmail via Exim ???

English is read from top down with context, not random order. Please adjust your quoting accordingly. Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 04:18 AM 4/2/04, you wrote: >>Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Just one question ... ? Which webmail interface should I use in Exim >> > Mail Serv

Re: Webmail via Exim ???

> Hi! Debian Users > > Just one question ... ? Which webmail interface should I use in Exim Mail > Server and Qpopper Services ? > I use squirrelmail with woody/exim/imap. check out http://talk.trekweb.com/~jasonb/articles/exim_maildir_imap.shtml for a good howto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: Webmail via Exim ???

Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just one question ... ? Which webmail interface should I use in Exim > Mail Server and Qpopper Services ? Not sure about qpopper, but I use squirrelmail with my site... -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin

Re: Webmail question

ton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "David Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 3:58 PM > Subject: Re: Webmail question > > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:23:49 -0500 > > "David Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Webmail

* Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I need to install a webmail in a Debian GNU/Linux box for use with: > - Qmail; > - IMAP; > - Maildir; > - Accounts in MySQL; > - Preferible in Perl. It's written in C not in Perl, but you might want to

Re: Webmail

One of the standards for qmail and imap: http://inter7.com/sqwebmail/ On 20 October 2002 15:20, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > Hi all, > I need to install a webmail in a Debian GNU/Linux box for use with: > - Qmail; > - IMAP; > - Maildir; > - Accounts

Re: Webmail software..

Thus spake Petre Daniel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > What other webmail software is up there? > i know squirell and basilix.. Aeromail is lightweight (though a bit out-of-date, I think). -- Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> View my website at http://codesorcery.net Please encrypt email using key

Re: Webmail software..

also sprach Brandon N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.29.0050 +0100]: > You can get webmail and a whole lot more, with phpGroupware (or you can > install just the mail module. > > www.phpgroupware.org ... which is, IMHO, an awesome concept and very cool so far, but not yet to be used productively...

Re: Webmail software..

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Petre Daniel wrote: > > > What other webmail software is up there? > > i know squirell and basilix.. > > You can get webmail and a whole lot more, with phpGroupware (or you can install just the mail module. www.phpgroupware.org it is also available as a .deb ___

Re: Webmail software..

also sprach Petre Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.29.0555 +0100]: > What other webmail software is up there? > i know squirell and basilix.. imp works quite fine. it's lacking threading though. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "

Re: Webmail software..

openwebmail is nice :) -lev On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Petre Daniel wrote: > What other webmail software is up there? > i know squirell and basilix.. > > > Petre L. Daniel,System Administrator > Canad Systems Pitesti Romania, > http://www.cyber.ro, email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tel:+4048220044, +40482062

Re: Webmail software..

hi ya petre http://www.Linux-Consulting.com/Mail/webmail.txt have fun alvin On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Petre Daniel wrote: > What other webmail software is up there? > i know squirell and basilix.. > > > Petre L. Daniel,System Administrator > Canad Systems Pitesti Romania, > http://www.cyber.ro,

Re: Webmail

One free one is qdpop, but they are discontinuing it. http://www-informatics.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/qdpop/hosting.htm Others include: http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ http://www.atdot.org/faq.shtml http://www.rts.com.au/warp/warpmail/ Of course there are many free externally hosted www-

Re: Webmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Check out the following URLs, they might be helpful. I know that at least one of these packages has been Debianized. http://webmail.wastl.net/ http://webbasedemail.com/ http://www.horde.org/imp/ HTH, noah On Tue, 23 May 2000, Andrew McRobert wrote: > hi > >

Re: WebMail

http://webmail.wastl.net/ is the "Webmail" homepage, its a server-side java mail thingie that is easy to setup, with an IMAP host to verify passwords..can sedtup multiple accounts, has all kinds of cool stuff, debian package too. downside though, its a memory hog, make sure u got at least 40-50MB

Re: WebMail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > anyone knows about a webmail software to use? > I want to provide webmail for my site. Check out the following URL's. At least one of these packages is available in .deb format. htt

Re: Webmail ... a script for a pop3 server?

> Yes it is although not free in the GPL sense. dotshop.com has a > perl-based CGI that will allow your users web based mail services. I > think the url is www.emumail.com (or .net). The only problem I ran into > is that you *need* perl 5.004_04 and if your running bo you don't have it. >

Re: Webmail ... a script for a pop3 server?

Michael \[badpixel/bad sector\] wrote: > > Hi! > > I have this pop3/smtp mailserver and would like to give users access > to their pop3 mailboxes + send emails via. their webbrowser. Just > like hotmail. It just doesn't have to be that advanced... Users just > need to be able to login, read th

Re: Webmail ... a script for a pop3 server?

On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Michael [badpixel/bad sector] wrote: > Hi! > > I have this pop3/smtp mailserver and would like to give users access > to their pop3 mailboxes + send emails via. their webbrowser. Just > like hotmail. It just doesn't have to be that advanced... Users just > need to be able