On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:29:04AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Google could evaluate the non-browser software in use and pass what is > secure and fail the other packages with explanations for the authors of > failed packages [...]
I think it's more subtle than that. "Traditional" (i.e. non-Webmail) clients are qualified as "insecure" although they haven't to be. This will softly nudge people towards (Google) webmail. OTOH I don't want to be misunderstood. Google is big, and they actually do a couple of things which benefit us all. Project Zero, for one. Google Summer of Code, for another. Cheers -- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
