ussing a while back (see archives), it is a supported configuration
> >>by the kernel, and Red Hat have supported it since 7.3. I guess that's
> >>why Progeny decided to port anaconda - it worked out your tough problem.
> >
> >
> > It not so much the anaconda i
rnel, and Red Hat have supported it since 7.3. I guess that's
>>why Progeny decided to port anaconda - it worked out your tough problem.
>
>
> It not so much the anaconda issue, more over it is the "Debian Way" of
> doing things. I guess^WKNOW, Grub has issue with
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 12:47 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:18:14AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > As far as Knoppix. I use it for hardware detection and to make sure
> > machine are able to handle it proper, for those odd pieces that aren't
> > quite able to be used by linu
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:18:14AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> As far as Knoppix. I use it for hardware detection and to make sure
> machine are able to handle it proper, for those odd pieces that aren't
> quite able to be used by linux yet... or never will be (some Video cards
> for instance...
i were
> discussing a while back (see archives), it is a supported configuration
> by the kernel, and Red Hat have supported it since 7.3. I guess that's
> why Progeny decided to port anaconda - it worked out your tough problem.
It not so much the anaconda issue, more over it is the
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 20:32 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 05:53:21PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 00:06 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> > > Knoppix, Gnoppix, Progeny
> >
> > So, then Carl... you base all of yo
Joey Hess wrote:
> ...
> FWIW, repeatedly whining and harping on features that you want is really
> not a very efficient motivator for volenteers. I suppose we'll get NTFS
> resize and software raid on root support when someone feels the need to
> ad them, and has the guts to go code something.
I
install. So does SuSE Personal 9.1.
>
>
> Too bad. MD Raid is tough for a bootable setup with automated tools.
This is part of what i don't understand. As Alvin Oga and i were
discussing a while back (see archives), it is a supported configuration
by the kernel, and Red Hat have s
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 05:53:21PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 00:06 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> > Knoppix, Gnoppix, Progeny
>
> So, then Carl... you base all of your Servers on HUGE-MON-GOLLY-GOUS
> package lists?
Non sequitur. If I liked, say,
Carl Fink wrote:
While your description is exaggerated, what's wrong with an installer
that detects the hardware for me, so I don't have to manually set
dozens or hundreds of things? You seem to be implying that's bad.
What's wrong with an installer that lets me resize NTFS partitions?
What's
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 00:03 -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Paul Gear:
> >
> > I didn't write this rant about GUI vs. non-GUI. I wrote it about the
> > "Debian is fine, and if you don't like it, go use Windows" attitude that
> > seems to surface so often in posts in this group.
>
> Well
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 14:41 -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> > Check this list's archives. I've been using Debian since Slink. I'm a
> > refugee from Windows 3.1 and OS/2 Warp, if I'm a refugee at all.
> >
> > While your description is exaggerated, what's wrong with an installer that
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 22:55 -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Carl Fink:
> >
> > It isn't just that, Paul. The people who've been working on
> > debian-installer for years now are not eager to hear that several
> > other distributions have better ones, which is what you (and I) have
>
> I
> know that Slackware does X installation by default as do these others.
>
> Knoppix, Gnoppix, Progeny
So, then Carl... you base all of your Servers on HUGE-MON-GOLLY-GOUS
package lists?
Knoppix has 1200+ packages installed
Gnoppix is similar, but smaller 1000+
Progeny == De
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 09:20 +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> John Summerfield wrote:
> > Paul Gear wrote:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Is anyone here using Progeny?
> >>> ...
> >> I tried it as an easy way of getting Sarge installed.
Carl Fink wrote:
> Check this list's archives. I've been using Debian since Slink. I'm a
> refugee from Windows 3.1 and OS/2 Warp, if I'm a refugee at all.
>
> While your description is exaggerated, what's wrong with an installer that
> detects the hardware for me, so I don't have to manually se
On Aug 14, 10:09, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:55:00PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
>
> > I just don't understand where you people come from. I've been
> > installing Linux since SLS (ca '93), and I've never thought Debian's
> > installer was anywhere near as bad as some of you peopl
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:55:00PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> I just don't understand where you people come from. I've been
> installing Linux since SLS (ca '93), and I've never thought Debian's
> installer was anywhere near as bad as some of you people think it is.
>
> You seem to want somethin
,
Oh, RAID if you wanted.
It was boot a floppy, remove floppy when it was not longer needed, then
go about other things.
I'm far from that level of productivity with Debian. I think I can reach
it with Progeny.
What you tell me is that there's a lot of people using Debian who don
m == x86){
use Knoppix hardware detection and X installer
}else{
use the one from d-i
}
Anaconda supports most of them.Looking at recent source I see
IA32
IA64
AMD-64
S/390
PPC - pSeries
PPC - mac
alpha
sparc64
Anaconda is GPL, and thight now does text-mode, GUI and automatic
(kickstart) ins
Incoming from Paul Gear:
>
> I didn't write this rant about GUI vs. non-GUI. I wrote it about the
> "Debian is fine, and if you don't like it, go use Windows" attitude that
> seems to surface so often in posts in this group.
Well, welcome to Debian. To be honest, there's a few in here
complaini
Tom Allison wrote:
> ...
> I'm late on this, but I have to say that the debian installer was
> actually the best installer I've ever seen. It was very true to the
> ideas that makes Debian better than Fedora or Suse (This is just my
> opinion so don't argue about it)
>
> I can install a non-GUI s
Incoming from s. keeling:
> Incoming from Carl Fink:
> >
> > It isn't just that, Paul. The people who've been working on
> > debian-installer for years now are not eager to hear that several
> > other distributions have better ones, which is what you (and I) have
>
> I just don't understand wher
Incoming from Carl Fink:
>
> It isn't just that, Paul. The people who've been working on
> debian-installer for years now are not eager to hear that several
> other distributions have better ones, which is what you (and I) have
I just don't understand where you people come from. I've been
insta
hers.
Knoppix, Gnoppix, Progeny
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http://www.jabootu.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:20:10AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
I'm finding this mailing list a little hard to cope with. Some people
on it think they know everything about Linux because they've been using
Debian for 3 years. I've been using Linux for 10 years, but because i
didn't u
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:20:10AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> I'm finding this mailing list a little hard to cope with. Some people
> on it think they know everything about Linux because they've been using
> Debian for 3 years. I've been using Linux for 10 years, but because i
> didn't use Debian
John Summerfield wrote:
> Paul Gear wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Is anyone here using Progeny?
>>> ...
>>
>> I tried it as an easy way of getting Sarge installed. It looks pretty
>> good, but it didn't detect
Paul Gear wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone here using Progeny?
If yes how does it compare to Sarge. I know the installer is easy.
How's the usability out of the box? Sarge is pretty nice and fast but it
takes a while to set it up (for me at least). Will it be free (money-wise)?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is anyone here using Progeny?
>
> If yes how does it compare to Sarge. I know the installer is easy.
> How's the usability out of the box? Sarge is pretty nice and fast but it
> takes a while to set it up (for me at least). Will it be free (money-wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone here using Progeny?
If yes how does it compare to Sarge. I know the installer is easy.
How's the usability out of the box? Sarge is pretty nice and fast but it
takes a while to set it up (for me at least). Will it be free (money-wise)?
What kernel(s) wi
Is anyone here using Progeny?
If yes how does it compare to Sarge. I know the installer is easy.
How's the usability out of the box? Sarge is pretty nice and fast but it
takes a while to set it up (for me at least). Will it be free (money-wise)?
What kernel(s) will it include?
Mike
-
http://www.orangecrate.com/article.php?sid=757
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A R wrote:
I think may be interesting to the list members
http://archive.progeny.com/progeny/pgi/
How does it work exactly?
I've just tested it on two machines, and it worked great for me with
hardware auto detection and everything. Remember though, it is still in
development, and th
I think may be interesting to the list members
http://archive.progeny.com/progeny/pgi/
How does it work exactly?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thursday 10 January 2002 06:15 am, S.Ghosh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone please explain how to set up an external
> modem under Debian-Progeny 1.0. Also how is the
> printer setup carried out under Progeny. The external
> modem worked well under RedHat 7.0 & 7.1. So
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 02:15, S.Ghosh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone please explain how to set up an external
> modem under Debian-Progeny 1.0. Also how is the
> printer setup carried out under Progeny. The external
> modem worked well under RedHat 7.0 & 7.1. So I am
Hello,
Could someone please explain how to set up an external
modem under Debian-Progeny 1.0. Also how is the
printer setup carried out under Progeny. The external
modem worked well under RedHat 7.0 & 7.1. So I am
hoping it will under Progeny.
All help is sincerely appreciated.
A lost
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:05:59AM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
| I finally bit the bullet, and "upgraded" one of my Progeny machines to
| woody this weekend.
|
| Things went reasonably well, althoug certainly not automaticly.
|
| In any case, when I loged inot a Gnome session, things wer
I finally bit the bullet, and "upgraded" one of my Progeny machines to
woody this weekend.
Things went reasonably well, althoug certainly not automaticly.
In any case, when I loged inot a Gnome session, things were not very
useable, so I loged out, deleted .gnom* .esd* .saw* and log
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:54:06AM -0800, Montagne, Michael arranged the
electrons something like this:
> I've come to the point where I need to cut the cord with Progeny. I've read
> the how-tos about converting to Woody and they each seem frought with peril.
> What
I've come to the point where I need to cut the cord with Progeny. I've read
the how-tos about converting to Woody and they each seem frought with peril.
What is wrong with this scenario? I change my sources.list to include the
debian sites, run dist-upgrade and call it good. I&#x
On Thursday 15 November 2001 21:03, spear wrote:
> Hi there !
>
> I was wondering : a few weeks ago, i contacted Steve Schaffer from
> Progeny, about the graphical installation process of the Progeny
> Debian, wondering if they would let it to our community ...
> He said y
But it makes it a bit easier. My first linux was Progeny and it's GUI
> installer helped me very much. I vote for GUI installer as a option at
> boot-time.
>
> Patrik
Corel was my first Linux and I was sold by the easy install process. I
wasn't computer illiterate (had used O
Yes! But it makes it a bit easier. My first linux was Progeny
> and it's GUI installer helped me very much. I vote for GUI
> installer as a option at boot-time.
>
> Patrik
I would also have to agree. Make the gui installer the default
for the newbies but leave the console inst
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:16:37AM +1000, Jason Currey wrote:
> A GUI installer might not make install easier, but it gives first time linux
> users a much better feeling about installing the product.
Yes! But it makes it a bit easier. My first linux was Progeny and it's GUI
installe
A GUI installer might not make install easier, but it gives first time linux
users a much better feeling about installing the product.
I have seen a number of linux flavour comparisons and most comparisons show
the debian installer as one of the weaknesses of a debian flavoured linux.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:49:14PM -0800, Dmitriy wrote:
> What exactly does make a GUI install easier?
>
> It is a lot more hassle, and not much use.
>
> I agree that installer can be made more userfriendly proably for some
> people, but there can be a nice Curses based install.
I certainl
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:49:14PM -0800, Dmitriy wrote:
> What exactly does make a GUI install easier?
>
> It is a lot more hassle, and not much use.
>
> I agree that installer can be made more userfriendly proably for some
> people, but there can be a nice Curses based install.
>
> I think ma
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 02:03:23PM +0100, spear wrote:
> Hi there !
>
> I was wondering : a few weeks ago, i contacted Steve Schaffer from Progeny,
> about the graphical installation process of the Progeny Debian, wondering if
> they would let it to our community ...
> He sa
Hi there !
I was wondering : a few weeks ago, i contacted Steve Schaffer from Progeny,
about the graphical installation process of the Progeny Debian, wondering if
they would let it to our community ...
He said yes ...
So, did anybody hear about it's amelioration, and, maybe, future integr
oks better than the old Progeny one.
>
> How did you do this?
> Got an example config to share?
It's nothing special...I just used the "Configure" option
under "System" on GDM and changed the font, changed the
greeting and changed the graphic to something simple I wh
y unless you select the folder.
>
>I had no major problems with the dist-upgrade from Progeny to woody.
>
>Like Jesse mentioned, my desktop did show only folder icons so I
>deleted (renamed actually, then deleted a few days later when I was
>sure everything was ok) the .gnome and .gn
d in this "upgrade".
>
> The only things I've noticed so far is the desktop icons refuse
> to be anything but folders, and the font which describes them
> also refuses to display unless you select the folder.
I had no major problems with the dist-upgrade from Progeny to wood
Jesse Goerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, woody's version of gdm isn't as "pretty" and it removes the
> System menu so you can't reboot from the login screen. You will
> have to use the config utility for gdm to fix that (can't remember
> the name of it).
. . . or edit /etc/gdm/gdm.conf at
On Saturday 10 November 2001 09:23, Stan Brown wrote:
> I've looked at the Progeny page on this, and it looks a bit
> scary to atempt on a machine that I need to keep working.
>
> Can anyone thta has atempted this give me some feedback?
> Sucess, _and_ failure stories a
I've looked at the Progeny page on this, and it looks a bit scary to atempt
on a machine that I need to keep working.
Can anyone thta has atempted this give me some feedback? Sucess, _and_
failure stories apprecited. Also some cometary on what nice features might
have disapeared in this &qu
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:40:47PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
| So, here's the question. Given that I want to build machines with fairly
| moder user interafaces (read that as some recent version of Gnome) on these
| new machines, and that I really just followed the cookbok deirections on
| upgradi
I've bult several machines in the past few months by:
1. Installing an absolute minimum potato release.
2. Folowing the Progeny "Upgrade to Progeny web page"
3. Installing the 24. kernel packages
4. Building a custom 2.4 kernel.
This has worked extremely well for me, as it gives m
It's there (in unstable). See autoinstall. (I haven't tried it and
honestly wouldn't know how to begin).
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:22:11PM +1000, Mike Williams wrote:
>
> My understanding is that Progeny (the company) is still alive, and that
> they wish to migrate
>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:34:02 +0200 (CEST),
>>> "Wilmer" == Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wilmer> There are some Debian-based distro's with very nice installers and
Wilmer> things like that already. One of then is Progeny
I am trying the comand (see below) sequence just to see if it works
better than the Progeny->Woody version that repeatedly fails to
support pcmcia on my laptop.
This is an upgrade to Unstable.
There is one change, on line two "deps" needs to be "depends".
Also, under
Looking at the recommendations for the upgrade on the Progeny site, I wonder if
the noted specific install of modutils/modconf is what is necessary to correct
this PCMCIA problem (i.e. at which point you would have to run modconf and
specifically make sure the module for PCMCIA is getting loaded
> Progeny to Woody howto
> http://www.debianplanet.org/debianplanet/article.php?sid=450
Been using that one. It is incomplete since it fails to mention the
trashing
of pcmcia, among other things.
> Progeny to unstable
> http://www.debianplanet.org/debianplanet/article.php?sid=414
Please find following the instructions from Progeny for the Woody
upgrade with the error messages received at each step.
Anyone see something exceptional?
If so what is the proper response other than proceeding on with
the install and ignoring the error messages?
Thanks! Doc
I went and wiped everything with a fresh install of Progeny.
I then walked through the Woody upgrade instructions, noting
but ignoring errors. (I have them ready to post once I have a
successful install.)
Here, again, is the source of the instructions I followed:
http://www.progeny.com/archive
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>testing. When I tried to install xserver-xfree86
>(4.1), it started out fine, identified my printer, and
>then hung while installing/configuring. This also
>Now though, I can't uninstall xserver-xfree86 - it
>exits with error status 10, b
Hi,
I upgraded my Potato box to Progeny, and now to Debian
testing. When I tried to install xserver-xfree86
(4.1), it started out fine, identified my printer, and
then hung while installing/configuring. This also
happened when I upgraded to Progeny/Newton. In the
earlier case I just uninstalled
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Shea Martin wrote:
>
> It looks like Progeny never installed any C header files during
> install???
> I didn't even know that was legal here in Unix world. In fact I have
> never come across such a problem, and don't really know how
"Stan Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's where I am at tthe moment. I installed a minimal stable, the did the
> Progeny update, leting it install grub.
>
> Now, the machine boots up to the grub command screen (not the grub user
> menu), and hangs.
does it give an error message saying it can't find something ?
Also it should be possible to load your old kernel
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User List"
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 8:16 AM
Subject: Satble -
I have a machine which I _absolutely_ need to have working Monday. I need
to have it have to Progeny update + 2.4 kernel. I've been fighting with
this all weekend, having started over about a dozen times at this point in
time :-(
Here's where I am at tthe moment. I installed a minimal s
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:47:40AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
[...snip ranting]
> I have a dialup system at home with potato on it. So I decided to
> upgrade to progeny and to make a new installation.
[...snip ranting]
> I would appreciate some advice.
My suggestion is to one
Working in a Redhat dominated environment, I boasted about apt-get and
that a Debian system never have to be reinstalled if it is managed
properly. After my recent experience I would not boast easily again.
I have a dialup system at home with potato on it. So I decided to
upgrade to progeny and
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:56:14PM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) said something like:
>Would anyone recommend
>Progeny Debian instead? I looked at their web site and it looked good -
>the matter in question would be - would it be as good for a beginner?
>Can a
>Can anyone give a qualitative analysis on Progeny?
It seems a mixed bag to me. I have had it install ok sometimes and then not
install other times on same hardware. The package manager is not even close
to Stormpkg, and the desktop is quirky at times. In other respects it seems
quite nice
The only significant difference I noticed with Progeny was the installer,
though this may have been due to the fact that I simply upgraded my Progeny
install to Woody almost right after, and then happily upgraded that to Sid...
Speaking of the installer, it's not very good (IMO), especiall
classmate in computer science to try out Debian, but it
> might intimidate her initially (she's currently a Windows user). Would anyone
> recommend Progeny Debian instead? I looked at their web site and it looked
> good - the matter in question would be - would it be as good for a
fer my newbie friend
| and classmate in computer science to try out Debian, but it might
| intimidate her initially (she's currently a Windows user). Would
| anyone recommend Progeny Debian instead? I looked at their web site
| and it looked good - the matter in question would be - would it be
ly a Windows user). Would anyone recommend Progeny
Debian instead? I looked at their web site and it looked good - the matter in
question would be - would it be as good for a beginner? Can anyone give a
qualitative analysis on Progeny?
Thanks!
Paolo Falcone
__
www.edsamail.com
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:29:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
scribbled
> Alright. Now I am down to thinking progeny would be the best to nab. But
> here is what I don't know yet...
>
> Are the downloads upgrades free from their servers?
> Does anyone
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:29:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alright. Now I am down to thinking progeny would be the best to nab.
> But here is what I don't know yet...
>
> Are the downloads upgrades free from their servers?
I believe so, and would be surprised if they
I installed Progeny on my system (to simplify the installation procedure) and
then upgraded it to Woody soon after without any problem, all it took is
modifying my sources.list and doing an "apt-get dist-upgrade". So far, after
more than a month of use I have not seen any problems
In a message dated 8/27/01 2:45:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
work I use potato on my servers and woody on my workstation. But, at home
I decided to try out Progeny. It's a nice distrobution, and yes the
updates
are free. It uses Grub instead of lilo, and whe
At work I use potato on my servers and woody on my workstation. But, at home
I decided to try out Progeny. It's a nice distrobution, and yes the updates
are free. It uses Grub instead of lilo, and when you update it also updates
to the the current kernel that progeny is using. At w
Alright. Now I am down to thinking progeny would be the best to nab. But
here is what I don't know yet...
Are the downloads upgrades free from their servers?
Does anyone have any experience upgrading from progeny to woody/sid?
- Dan
I think the progeny installer, and software included
>
> G'day DanSV,
>
>
> I've heard good things about Progeny but haven't used it my self, the
> Progeny web-site says
As long as you are in America or your PC has american hardware e.g.
keyboard and so on. There was a test of differnt Linux Distributions in
>>>>> "DanSV" == DanSV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DanSV> I was wondering what the best way to install and then
DanSV> maintain debian is. I have tried libranet, but not progeny
DanSV> or just pure debian (beyond 2.1 that is). I want a
I was wondering what the best way to install and then maintain debian is.
I have tried libranet, but not progeny or just pure debian (beyond 2.1 that
is).
I want a simple install, and hard-ware recognition on the level of mandrake
(they say they can get 3D support with an ati rage128 (2000
Avdi writes:
> The modem is *amazingly* slow to respond. But it dials, and then slwly
> the ISP's prompts appear.
This is a symptom of an incorrect IRQ. What do setserial and
'cat /proc/interrupts' say?
> Hoever, the default chatscript I modified had the "ogin:"/"sword:"
> expect/reply pai
Hi,
First, apologies for the cross-posting; I'm not sure which list this plea
belongs on.
I finally took the plunge last weekend and made my switch to Progeny Debian
from Mandrake 7.2. I'm not going to talk about Progeny's (horrible) installer
in this message. Suffice to sa
I have an HP6000SE (single ended) SCSI media storage unit that was (a):
given to me; (b): originally used uith an HP 7000 Apollo running HP-UX.
I am wondering if I may be able to use my Yamaha CRW 2100 CD-R/RW, HP
6390 Scanner, and the several harddrives- DCLZ tape drive- and the
original CD-ROM th
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 11:03:59AM +1000, Krisno Pryosusilo wrote:
> I'm a relatively new user of Linux and have since yesterday, migrated
> from SuSE 7.1 to a boxed version 1.0 of Progeny Debian.
> I chose Progeny because of my perception that Progeny would be easier to
> instal
Robert Voigt wrote:
I thought you get access to a progeny support mailing list or something if
you buy a progeny box. Is this wrong?
Right and wrong: Right, there is a progeny mailing list. Wrong, it's
actually free.
http://www.progeny.com/prodserv/support/
Then I spend 3 days downloading woody hoping that would fix it, but it
still doesn't work. Can someone please tell me how to fix it?
Thanks,
Chuck
I thought you get access to a progeny support mailing list or something if
you buy a progeny box. Is this wrong?
* Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010526 18:16]:
> on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:09:22PM -0600, John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 25 May 2001, jennyw wrote:
> >
> > >I'm trying to reinstall Progeny Debian 1.0 (boxed copy),
there would be no reason to 'upgrade' to debian. they basicaly are
debian, with updated packages in some cases, and gui installers and config
tools.
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"When we have nothing left to give
There will be no reason for us to live
But when we have nothing left to
After much effort, I have totally failed on my efforts to install Debian, but I
would still like to run it. (My linux partition is past sector 1023, and it
won't make a boot floppy. I sort of managed to get around this by using the
Grub install that RedHat did, since it pointed to the correct p
on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:49:12PM -0700, jennyw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Galt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > First of all, this is a Debian list, not a Progeny list. They are
>
> I thought this list was for general
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
