On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 19:55:56 -0300
Rodrigo Cunha wrote:
> Where is the iHD_drv_video.so project? I search for it on Google, but
> not find it.
charles@hawk:~$ apt-file search iHD_drv_video
intel-media-va-driver: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/iHD_drv_video.so
intel-media-va-driver-non-free:
/usr/
a chromium derivative) on my Lenovo
> > Yoga 13 under Bullseye, and under Bookworm upgraded from Bullseye.
> > However, I just did a fresh installation of Bullseye, and I see the
> > following:
> >
> > charles@tsalmoth:~$ vivaldi &
> > [1] 31395
> > ch
>
> charles@tsalmoth:~$ vivaldi &
> [1] 31395
> charles@tsalmoth:~$ MESA-INTEL: warning: Ivy Bridge Vulkan support is
> incomplete libva error:
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/iHD_drv_video.so init failed
>
> charles@tsalmoth:~$
Progress! I inadvertently launched vivald
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:05:19 +
Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote:
> Checking on packages.debian.org, it appears that iHD_drv_video.so is
> provided by two different packages: intel-media-va-driver and
> intel-media-va-driver-non-free.
>
> Is there any chance that one system has
I see the
> following:
>
> charles@tsalmoth:~$ vivaldi &
> [1] 31395
> charles@tsalmoth:~$ MESA-INTEL: warning: Ivy Bridge Vulkan support is
> incomplete
> libva error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/iHD_drv_video.so init failed
>
> charles@tsalmoth:~$
>
> Regre
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 18:17:22 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:57:15AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> [...]
>
> Silly question - but it's a start:
>
> What does your /etc/apt/sources.list say - does it have the correct
> stanza to pull in non-free firmware if nece
t; following:
>
> charles@tsalmoth:~$ vivaldi &
> [1] 31395
> charles@tsalmoth:~$ MESA-INTEL: warning: Ivy Bridge Vulkan support is
> incomplete
> libva error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/iHD_drv_video.so init failed
>
> charles@tsalmoth:~$
>
> Regression?
>
> An
I have been able to run vivaldi (a chromium derivative) on my Lenovo
Yoga 13 under Bullseye, and under Bookworm upgraded from Bullseye.
However, I just did a fresh installation of Bullseye, and I see the
following:
charles@tsalmoth:~$ vivaldi &
[1] 31395
charles@tsalmoth:~$ MESA-INTEL: war
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:01:09PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
> So, perhaps try an apt-get update first.
Thanks, I forgot to update my instalation first :(
Martin
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:52:50PM +0200, Martin wrote:
>
> I am trying to install libsdl2-dev package using aptitude unsuccessfully . I
> get error:
>
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mesa/libegl1-mesa-dev_19.1.4-1_amd64.deb:
> 4
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:52:50PM +0200, Martin wrote:
> I am trying to install libsdl2-dev package using aptitude unsuccessfully . I
> get error:
>
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mesa/libegl1-mesa-dev_19.1.4-1_amd64.deb:
> 404
I am trying to install libsdl2-dev package using aptitude unsuccessfully . I
get error:
E: Failed to fetch
http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mesa/libegl1-mesa-dev_19.1.4-1_amd64.deb:
404
Not Found [IP: 151.101.12.204 80]
E: Unable to fetch some packages; try '-o APT
> > The solution seems simple:
> >
> > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > libglvnd0-nvidia
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> > libglvnd0"
> >
> > But how do you do that with an inaccessible system? The system can be
> > booted in recovery mode, and the change can be m
Am 19.10.2017 um 21:09 schrieb Simon Pepping:
> The solution seems simple:
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> libglvnd0-nvidia
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libglvnd0"
>
> But how do you do that with an inaccessible system? The system can be
> booted in recover
After an upgrade of libgl1-mesa-glx to version 17.2.2-1 and a reboot,
the system hangs during startup and has become inaccessible. lightdm's
x-0.log and Xorg.0.log logfiles mention an error: undefined symbol:
_glapi_tls_Current.
The problem is described in several bug reports:
* Bug #8
libclutter-gtk-1.0-0 libcogl-pango20 libcogl-path20
libcogl20 libevolution libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-glx libglu1-mesa-dev
libmutter0e
libpeas-1.0-0 libqt4-opengl-dev librhythmbox-core8 libseed-gtk3-0
libtotem0 lightsoff quadrapassel rhythmbox rhythmbox-plugin-cdrecorder
rhythmbox-plugins swell
On Dec 10, 2013 at 14:54, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > Sometimes there are insane hard dependencies, but what's bad with those
> > dependencies? Take a look at the modules compiled into the default
> > kernel, most modules are unne
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:20:57PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 01:54 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > Sometimes there are insane hard dependencies, but what's bad with those
>
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 01:54 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > Sometimes there are insane hard dependencies, but what's bad with those
^^^
> > dependencies? Take
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Sometimes there are insane hard dependencies, but what's bad with those
> dependencies? Take a look at the modules compiled into the default
> kernel, most modules are unneeded on your machine ;).
Huh? That is not insane at all! It
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Ivan Kovnatsky wrote:
> When trying to remove either libdrm-nouveau2 or libdrm-radeon1 I obviously get
> a message that this required packages. Thing is I really do not need them.
> What options do I have to get rid of them like normally using apt/aptitude
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 18:06 +0200, Ivan Kovnatsky wrote:
> libgl1-mesa-dri
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libgl1-mesa-dr
That are hard dependencies, you could take a look if you could recompile
it without the unneeded parts, or test if a dummy package shouldn't
break it. Sometimes t
On 2013-12-07 17:06 +0100, Ivan Kovnatsky wrote:
> I have blindly (I guess/installed and forgot about it) installed on
> my laptop these packages as requirements to libgl1-mesa-dri: libdrm-intel1,
> libdrm-nouveau2, libdrm-radeon1. OK, first one libdrm-intel1 is what I real
Hi Guys! I have blindly (I guess/installed and forgot about it) installed on
my laptop these packages as requirements to libgl1-mesa-dri: libdrm-intel1,
libdrm-nouveau2, libdrm-radeon1. OK, first one libdrm-intel1 is what I really
need:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation
Here's what I see every day,
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xserver-xorg-core: Conflicts: xserver-xorg-input-4 which is a virtual package.
Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video-5 which is a virtual package.
libgl1-mesa-dri: Depends: libdrm-radeon1 (>
Daniel Lidström wrote:
(I've sent this mail to ubuntu-users as well, but have not got a reply yet.)
Hi,
how do I resolve this error?
hen...@henriklaptop:~$ sudo apt-get install libglu1-mesa-dev
[sudo] password for henrik:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
Daniel Lidström wrote:
(I've sent this mail to ubuntu-users as well, but have not got a reply yet.)
Hi,
how do I resolve this error?
hen...@henriklaptop:~$ sudo apt-get install libglu1-mesa-dev
[sudo] password for henrik:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
(I've sent this mail to ubuntu-users as well, but have not got a reply yet.)
Hi,
how do I resolve this error?
hen...@henriklaptop:~$ sudo apt-get install libglu1-mesa-dev
[sudo] password for henrik:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information...
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:48:24 +0200
Francesco Bochicchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8KM266/KL266]
I'm sure someone will correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think there
is any direct rendering support for any of the IGP chipsets f
X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o
> ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.4
> ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.4
> (II) SAVAGE: driver (version 2.0.0) for S3 Savage chipsets: Savage4,
>
>
> STILL, I cannot get DRI. glxinfo shows:
>
> name of
age4,
STILL, I cannot get DRI. glxinfo shows:
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No
and any OpenGL applications runs slowly and sucks 100% of CPU.
I remember reading (but cannot find the link) that debian has only
Mesa packages that do not support DRI, so you need to
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 06:15:10PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 10:50:16 -0800
> Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:43:31PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > I have on my system the nvidia drivers installed, and these provide
> > > the(propietar
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 10:50:16 -0800
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:43:31PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > I have on my system the nvidia drivers installed, and these provide
> > the(propietary) nvidia opengl drivers. But I can't seem to get
> > apt-get to remove x
Wim De Smet sez:
} I have on my system the nvidia drivers installed, and these provide the
} (propietary) nvidia opengl drivers. But I can't seem to get apt-get to
} remove xlibmesa because it seems to need that, while it shouldn't
} because I have another openGL version installed. Does anybody kno
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:43:31PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> I have on my system the nvidia drivers installed, and these provide the
> (propietary) nvidia opengl drivers. But I can't seem to get apt-get to
> remove xlibmesa because it seems to need that, while it shouldn't
> because I have anothe
Hi,
I have on my system the nvidia drivers installed, and these provide the
(propietary) nvidia opengl drivers. But I can't seem to get apt-get to
remove xlibmesa because it seems to need that, while it shouldn't
because I have another openGL version installed. Does anybody know how
to solve this
>
>
> I think the statements about minimum state
>required to implement features that are scattered through the spec are
>aimed more at people implementing the spec than people using an
>implementation, but I may be very wrong about that.
>
>Tom
>
>
No, you are correct, but knowing about the
cating which of these
> client-defined plane equations are enabled. In the initial state, all
> client-defined plane equation coeffients are zero and all planes are
> disabled.
>
> .. but I'm sure you've read that.
Indeed I have, although it was in the 1.2 spec (since
On 0, "Eric G. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:11:44PM +0930, Tom Cook wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This may be a mesa bug or it may be a manifestation of my ignorance of
> > opengl. If the latter then I apologise
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:11:44PM +0930, Tom Cook wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This may be a mesa bug or it may be a manifestation of my ignorance of
> opengl. If the latter then I apologise for OT posting.
>
> I am playing with clipping planes in an effort to do some fancy stuf
Tom Cook wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This may be a mesa bug or it may be a manifestation of my ignorance of
>opengl. If the latter then I apologise for OT posting.
>
>I am playing with clipping planes in an effort to do some fancy stuff
>in 3D graphics. My problem is that mesa a
Tom Cook wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This may be a mesa bug or it may be a manifestation of my ignorance of
>opengl. If the latter then I apologise for OT posting.
>
>I am playing with clipping planes in an effort to do some fancy stuff
>in 3D graphics. My problem is that mesa a
Hi all,
This may be a mesa bug or it may be a manifestation of my ignorance of
opengl. If the latter then I apologise for OT posting.
I am playing with clipping planes in an effort to do some fancy stuff
in 3D graphics. My problem is that mesa appears to only let me define
a client clipping
Hi Dan,
you can look in a hardware database, e. g. http://cdb.suse.de
HTH, Joachim
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:22:31AM -0600, Dan Griswold wrote:
> I was afraid that might be the case. However, I thought it might not,
> because I found 1 reference on the web to an oem that had 3d hardware
> acce
"Adam Majer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 03:45:55PM -0600, Dan Griswold wrote:
> > I'd like to have X use the hardware acceleration of my video
> > card. Actually, it's not an extra card at all, but a Trident
> > CyberBlade/i1 built onto the mainboard. I do have the follo
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 03:45:55PM -0600, Dan Griswold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I may be so confused that maybe I'm not even asking the right
> questions, but here goes.
>
> I'd like to have X use the hardware acceleration of my video
> card. Actually, it's not an extra card at all, but a Trident
> Cyber
kages installed, but maybe I need others:
xlibosmesa3
xlibmesa-dev
xlibmesa3
xlibs
glutg3
I also have these lines in my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file:
Load"GLcore" # OpenGL support
and
Load "glx"
With all of this, glxinfo still shows:
"OpenGL
said:
> Hi, can someone please tell me what I have to do to set up Mesa on
> my system to allow GL/3Dfx graphics support in games? It seems
> like when I install libc5 or libc6 all my libs get messed up and I
while i havent tried 3dfx under xfree4(OpenGL) and never tried
OpenGL und
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 06:41:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, can someone please tell me what I have to do to set up Mesa on my system
> to allow GL/3Dfx graphics support in games? It seems like when I install
> libc5 or libc6 all my libs get messed up and I have to
Hi, can someone please tell me what I have to do to set up Mesa on my system
to allow GL/3Dfx graphics support in games? It seems like when I install
libc5 or libc6 all my libs get messed up and I have to reinstall! ..
Thanks,
Deven Gallo
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:05:10PM +0200, Jan Krupa wrote:
> > the Mesa-prefixes have been dropped to make it easier to port
> > applications to MesaGL.
> > I compile with, for example:
> > gcc -Wall -o gluttest gluttest.c -lGLU -lglut -lGL -lm -L/usr/X11R6/lib
>
On 19 May 2001, Felix Natter wrote:
> Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would like to use the mesa (opengl) library in C or C++.
> >
> > I installed (debian2.2 potato)
> > mesa-glide2 3.1-17
> > mesa-widget 3.1-17
> > mesademos
>
On 19 May 2001, Felix Natter wrote:
> Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would like to use the mesa (opengl) library in C or C++.
> >
> > I installed (debian2.2 potato)
> > mesa-glide2 3.1-17
> > mesa-widget 3.1-17
> > mesademos
>
Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to use the mesa (opengl) library in C or C++.
>
> I installed (debian2.2 potato)
> mesa-glide2 3.1-17
> mesa-widget 3.1-17
> mesademos
>
> or tried (instead)
> mesa-dev
> mesag3
>
> I tried to
I would like to use the mesa (opengl) library in C or C++.
I installed (debian2.2 potato)
mesa-glide2 3.1-17
mesa-widget 3.1-17
mesademos
or tried (instead)
mesa-dev
mesag3
I tried to compile some example of using opengl (mesa) library
with the following heather:
#include
and using the
Le Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:37:37PM -0500, Jonathan Markevich écrivait :
> I upgraded to XFree 4.0.2 last week, and it went well. However, in trying
> to install the nVidia driver, I had a conflict with Mesa... it wants to
> remove mesa as well as all of kde2! I believe it provid
Jonathan Markevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I upgraded to XFree 4.0.2 last week, and it went well. However, in trying
>to install the nVidia driver, I had a conflict with Mesa... it wants to
>remove mesa as well as all of kde2! I believe it provides gl1 or something
>of
I upgraded to XFree 4.0.2 last week, and it went well. However, in trying
to install the nVidia driver, I had a conflict with Mesa... it wants to
remove mesa as well as all of kde2! I believe it provides gl1 or something
of that nature... The question is, do I need mesa with XFree 4.0.2? Isn&#
Oh...System specifics are as follows:
Dual PII 400
Atrend ATC-6260 w/ Intel 440BX and Adaptec 7800 family
chipsets.
256Mb PC100 RAM
Matrox G400
=
Regards- Nuhn O. Yobiznez
Licq # 14373626
Why?.Why not?..Why not try?
Hi All,
I have had (since Dec. 8) a problem w/ all X11_MESA
associated programs (mostly games) having appalling
reports of dropped frames and (of course) failing to
"open". I'm curious as to if anyone else is
experiencing these problems and, if so, would they be
willing to corraborate to f
"Rob" == Rob VanFleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been trying to set up mesag3-glide2 to work with a Voodoo3 on
> my Potato box, and I've met a few snags. Here is my primary
> problem, specifics will follow: Any time I try to execute any OpenGL
> app, like the morph3d, I get this message:
I've been trying to set up mesag3-glide2 to work with a Voodoo3 on my Potato
box, and I've met a few snags.
Here is my primary problem, specifics will follow:
Any time I try to execute any OpenGL app, like the morph3d, I get this message:
"_GlideInitEnvironment: libglide2x.so expected Voodoo Grap
I don't know how on-topic this is, but here's a shot.
I just upgraded to a new machine (yay) but the video has to wait... I'm
using a PCI card along with my Voodoo 1. Now whenever I go into GL stuff I
get garbage on the screen. Is this because of the AGP? Is there some way
to get back the funct
[2000-10-08] William Jensen wrote:
> I'll confess right from the start I'm ignorant about this topic.
Not an online reference I'm afraid, but there was an article in last
month's Linux Journal[1] covering the basics of this
"The Puzzle of 3-D Graphics on Linux" by John Matthews and Daryll Strauss
I'll confess right from the start I'm ignorant about this topic. Some of the
words I read about are:
OpenGL
Direct3d
Mesa
Glide
Direct3d I pretty much get...it's MS's 3d implementation. Can someone compare
and contrast what OpenGL, Mesa and Glide mean? This is in specific
of the mesag3 package undo that? It also fails to
> > mention mesa's libGL. Finally, the Mesa docs almost seem to imply that
> > libMesa is depreciated in favor of libGL, but they are two different files!
> >
> > I'm finding all of this very confusing. Anyone g
I need an obj file called libGL.so.1. xmms is nagging me abt it. I know that
it is part of the mesa3 packages but I can't seem to download any of them.
mesa3-glide (which is pretty much useless to me since its for 3dfx based
cards?), mesa3 or mesa3+ggi. cannot be downloaded. broken packages or m
...setting mode 3: 640 480
GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul
GL_RENDERER: Mesa NVIDIA RIVA 1.2
GL_VERSION: 1.2 Mesa 3.0
GL_EXTENSIONS: GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_logic_op
GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_paletted_texture GL_EXT_point_parameters
GL_EXT_polygon_offset GL_EXT_vertex_array
at? It also fails to
> mention mesa's libGL. Finally, the Mesa docs almost seem to imply that
> libMesa is depreciated in favor of libGL, but they are two different files!
>
> I'm finding all of this very confusing. Anyone got this woking with Quake II?
>
--
Didi Dam
to
mention mesa's libGL. Finally, the Mesa docs almost seem to imply that
libMesa is depreciated in favor of libGL, but they are two different files!
I'm finding all of this very confusing. Anyone got this woking with Quake II?
Thanks,
Bryan
I tried installing all of the Mesa and Glide stuff to get my Monster 3D card
working with Mesa, but it didn't seem to work. XRacer runs at about .1 fps
and none of the MESA_GLX_FX environment variable stuff will work with any
OpenGL stuff like Xmms or screensavers.
Does anyone have a li
Thanks Jonathan,
I got the file I was looking for - Glide2x_SDK-2.1-3.i386.rpm which is the
development
library. I couldn't find it at first cause all the 3dfx stuff on Daryll
Strauss' has
moved to the 3dfx website except the development library which is on his old
page.
Should've checked bet
Cyrus Patel wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to compile Mesa3.0 under potato. The readme file says:
>
> - You'll need the Glide library and headers. Mesa expects:
> /usr/local/glide/include/*.h// all the Glide headers
> /usr/loca
Hey all,
I'm trying to compile Mesa3.0 under potato. The readme file says:
- You'll need the Glide library and headers. Mesa expects:
/usr/local/glide/include/*.h// all the Glide headers
/usr/local/glide/lib/libglide2x.so
I downloaded the driver - Device
Hello,
I want to ask that if i install mesag3.deb package will i be able to use my
3dfx card...
Thanks,
Phillip Neumann
Hello,
Xscreensaver-gl has som mesa libs, so it doesnt depend on mesa when
installing.
I have 3dfx card, and can use it with Mesa3. So i suppost xcreensaver
should be able to use my 3dfx
How can i make xscreensaver-gl dont install its own mesa-libs ??
Or maybe i could get a tar.gz but
/usr/local/lib by default anyway I think,
>> so you don't need the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. If it isn't in there you can certainly
>> add it and run ldconfig.
I have 2.6 debs installed for other purposes and have to use LD... stuff
to get for example Quake working with ref_gl and
On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 08:35:43PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> >> Does anyone have any idea how long until Mesa3.0 libraries will be
> >> debianized?
> >> (Appararently it is req'd by the latest version of Blender. :(. ).
>
> When they are out of beta, I guess. It's pretty easy to compile t
>> Does anyone have any idea how long until Mesa3.0 libraries will be
>> debianized?
>> (Appararently it is req'd by the latest version of Blender. :(. ).
When they are out of beta, I guess. It's pretty easy to compile them
yourself though, just put them in /usr/local/lib and put a
LD_LI
Does anyone have any idea how long until Mesa3.0 libraries will be debianized?
(Appararently it is req'd by the latest version of Blender. :(. ).
Thanks,
Timothy
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16-Jun-98
Time: 15:06:20
This message was sent by XFMail.
Powere
Hallo,
ich suche die mesa2 libraries in einer libc5 Version für ein hamm System.
Hat jemand eine Idee?
Dirk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I compiled Mesa with gcc 2.8.1 + the latest libc6 (that includes
pthreads 0.7)
on Linux.
I tried make linux-386-pthreads,
make linux-386-elf,
make linux-elf
All the sample programs core dump. The debugger cannot step through the
core file.
I also tried putting a printf right the main
82 matches
Mail list logo
