On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 01:54 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > Sometimes there are insane hard dependencies, but what's bad with those
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > dependencies? Take a look at the modules compiled into the default
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > kernel, most modules are unneeded on your machine ;).
>
> Huh? That is not insane at all! It allows the kernel to boot on as many
> machines as possible.
>
> AFAIU, only the modules which are necessary for your machine are
> actually loaded, so approx. an extra 20MB is used(?) which, these days,
> shouldn't be a problem.
I agree and never mentioned something different. Take a look at the ^^^^
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1386688857.23432.22.camel@archlinux
