On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:22:49PM EDT, David Baron wrote:
> Code for this dinosaur apparently exists in the kernel sources. Make
> menuconfig show no options to compile it, however.
>
> Any way to do this? Deprecated? Not working?
What're you trying to do..? DRI the bugger..?
CJ
--
To UNSUB
Code for this dinosaur apparently exists in the kernel sources. Make
menuconfig show no options to compile it, however.
Any way to do this? Deprecated? Not working?
(I have very old sources that I used to build manually but these have not been
touched in a couple of years, it seems, no longer o
Am 2007-04-27 22:24:29, schrieb Bruffey, Mark:
> Help. What do I need to do to get the mach64 module installed? Thanks,
> Mark
- END OF REPLIED MESSAGE -
There is no module "mach64" but a config option in xorg.
dpkg-reconfigur
Help. What do I need to do to get the mach64 module installed? Thanks,
Mark
L. Mark Bruffey
Director Library Services
Central Baptist Theological Seminary
900 Forestview Lane N
Plymouth MN 55441
763 417 8264 (Tel)
763 417 8258 (Fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Central Seminary www.centralseminary.edu
On Monday 02 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64
> > Rage Pro Mobility card .. with the etch version of Xorg?
> >
> > The ATI web site does not provide drivers for this antique so I'll
> >
?
>
> I got direct rendering, with the aforementioned driver, running on
> 2.6.16-2. I currently have 2.6.18-4, and for some reason the driver
> won't install on it (it complains of the modules, or something.) It
> may work on your 2.6.20, but if not, I imagine you could install
ave 2.6.18-4, and for some reason the driver
won't install on it (it complains of the modules, or something.) It
may work on your 2.6.20, but if not, I imagine you could install the
image and headers for 2.6.16-2, then install the Mach64 driver, and run
that when you need direct rendering.
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:31:48 -0400
cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 06:01:56PM EDT, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:01 -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > > Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64
> > &g
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 06:01:56PM EDT, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:01 -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64
> > Rage Pro Mobility card .. with the etch version of Xorg?
> >
> > The ATI web si
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:01 -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64
> Rage Pro Mobility card .. with the etch version of Xorg?
>
> The ATI web site does not provide drivers for this antique so I'll
> have to use the one that&
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:54:15PM EDT, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:01 -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64 Rage
> > Pro Mobility card .. with the etch version of Xorg?
> >
> > The ATI web si
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:01 -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64 Rage
> Pro Mobility card .. with the etch version of Xorg?
>
> The ATI web site does not provide drivers for this antique so I'll have
> to use the one that&
Has anybody gotten direct rendering to work with the legacy mach64 Rage
Pro Mobility card .. with the etch version of Xorg?
The ATI web site does not provide drivers for this antique so I'll have
to use the one that's provided with Xorg.
$ lspci
[..] ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobili
Hello all,
after upgrade from sarge to etch direct rendering for my ati rage mobility
mach64 card is not working anymore. I have self-compiled kernel 2.6.19.
I downloaded both :
common-20060403-linux.i386.tar.bz2
mach64-20060325-linux.i386.tar.bz2
but I am unable to install the second one, it
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 18:52 -0700, Alex Gould wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to install Sarge as a lightweight X desktop (fluxbox an
> a few programs) on a HP pavilion 6355. It has an ATI mach64 video card
As far as I know you need to use the gatos drivers for the Mach64 cards.
Ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:52:44PM -0700, Alex Gould wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to install Sarge as a lightweight X desktop (fluxbox an
> a few programs) on a HP pavilion 6355. It has an ATI mach64 video card
> with 2 MB ram, connected to a
Hi, I'm trying to install Sarge as a lightweight X desktop (fluxbox an
a few programs) on a HP pavilion 6355. It has an ATI mach64 video card
with 2 MB ram, connected to an old 13 or 14 inch (I'm not sure) Packard
Bell monitor of some sort: the sticker on the back says it's a &quo
Hi, I'm trying to install Sarge as a lightweight X desktop (fluxbox an
a few programs) on a HP pavilion 6355. It has an ATI mach64 video card
with 2 MB ram, connected to an old 13 or 14 inch (I'm not sure) Packard
Bell monitor of some sort: the sticker on the back says it's a &quo
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:37:53 -0400 (EDT)
Jude DaShiell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what video card makers can debian sid just use out of
> the box without all of this aggravation? I had a trident vga with this
> machine earlier and if that's a good one, it will be easier to r
Out of curiosity, what video card makers can debian sid just use out of
the box without all of this aggravation? I had a trident vga with this
machine earlier and if that's a good one, it will be easier to replace a
monitor and change out a video card than what's going on over here now.
The co
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:31:43 +0300
David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 August 2006 07:21, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> > > The mach64 module wasn't found so X can't run on this machine that one
> > > was fatal. I did tasksel and selected desk
When I did aptitude install xserver-xorg -r earlier today I was told no
packages would be installed or removed so it's there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 19 August 2006 07:21, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> > The mach64 module wasn't found so X can't run on this machine that one
> > was fatal. I did tasksel and selected desktop environment so as to
> > have a few things for X to run but not quite enough thin
The mach64 module wasn't found so X can't run on this machine that one
was fatal. I did tasksel and selected desktop environment so as to
have a few things for X to run but not quite enough things apparently.
If you're talking about a mach64 video card, then you should be able
Jude DaShiell wrote:
The mach64 module wasn't found so X can't run on this machine that one
was fatal. I did tasksel and selected desktop environment so as to
have a few things for X to run but not quite enough things apparently.
apt-get install xserver-xorg?
--
To UNSUBSCR
The mach64 module wasn't found so X can't run on this machine that one was
fatal. I did tasksel and selected desktop environment so as to have a few
things for X to run but not quite enough things apparently.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 07:12:17PM -0800, Syed Huq wrote:
> It Worked !!
> Downloaded the xserver-mach4 using apt.
>
> Last question, how do I toggle between the various resolution modes.
> Right now, it's set to 640X480 and I want to toggle to the 1024X768
1. make sure the right resolutions are
gt;
> >
> >
> >>># dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
> >>
> >>You have to run dexconf to generate the config file every time you run
> >>dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86.
> >
> >
> > As per your suggestion, I ran dexconf after each dpkg-re
e the config file every time you run
>>dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86.
>
>
> As per your suggestion, I ran dexconf after each dpkg-reconfigure
> xserver-xfree86
> still no change.
>
> Depth of 24 and 16 shows up as the (EE) message of Driver can''t
> support dep
#x27;t
support depth 24(or16)
Do I need to download a specific xserver for this ATI Mach64 ?
When I do a , dpkg -l | grep xserver
I get:
xserver-common
xserver-xfree8
- Rathon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Syed Huq wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a newbie trying to get my Xserver working using Woody(3.0r1) and
> ATI Mach64 Graphics card.
>
> The general error is:
> (EE) ATI(0): Depth 16 is not supported through this adapter
>
> I had started with a Depth of 24 and got a Depth 24
Hi,
I am a newbie trying to get my Xserver working using Woody(3.0r1) and
ATI Mach64 Graphics card.
The general error is:
(EE) ATI(0): Depth 16 is not supported through this adapter
I had started with a Depth of 24 and got a Depth 24 is not supported
Then I changed to Depth of 8 and get this
uts.net/files/ ./
> deb-src http://www.nixnuts.net/files/ ./
>
> Thats what I am using at the moment with the mach64. There is also a source
> package for building the module (the compiled ones are only for k7 kernels). I
> don't know though how to compile them with only the kernel h
f the struggle to get dri working on the old ATI
> > > > rage pro clunker. Finally did compile a mach64.ko and got it working.
> > > > The
> > > > question is: Do I need this particular package?
> > > >
> > > > Any open-GL library I try to
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:54 +0200, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 November 2004 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> wrote:
> > > I have this as part of the struggle to get dri working on the old ATI
> > > rage pro clunker. Finally did co
On Sunday 14 November 2004 18:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> IIRC that doesn't support mach64 and is rather old.
>
> Go into the dri website (dri.sf.net IIRC) and under downloads there should
> be a link to debian packages from the latest snapshot. These also include
> mach
On Sunday 14 November 2004 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > I have this as part of the struggle to get dri working on the old ATI
> > rage pro clunker. Finally did compile a mach64.ko and got it working. The
> > question is: Do I need this particular package?
> >
>
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:32:40 +0200, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have this as part of the struggle to get dri working on the old ATI rage
> > pro
> > clunker. Finally did compile a mach64.ko and got it wo
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:32:40 +0200, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have this as part of the struggle to get dri working on the old ATI rage pro
> clunker. Finally did compile a mach64.ko and got it working. The question is:
> Do I need this particular package?
>
>
I have this as part of the struggle to get dri working on the old ATI rage pro
clunker. Finally did compile a mach64.ko and got it working. The question is:
Do I need this particular package?
Any open-GL library I try to install, say for compiling a game, will demand
the removal of this
I have to say it IS working. T'aint the greatest but working nevertheless.
Tuxracer runs perfectly, foo-billards runs fine, quakeII runs 100% (this
might auto-configure off GL if not operating), etc.
Gl117, billard-GL and Cube will NOT run.Flightgear runs problematically, not
really usable. The
One other problem. One an Xsession has restarted or even simply logged in and
out, dri comes up disabled. The Glx libary returns that the system cannot do
it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<<<<
I actually got a mach64.ko to compile and load. Congratulations.
Unfortunately, the xfree and mesa versions on that CVS would no compile. I do
have mesa-dri-mach64 and dri-trunk stuff from Sid.
So I load at start up agpgart, ati-agp and the mach64 modules. Agpgart
I actually got a mach64.ko to compile and load. Congratulations.
Unfortunately, the xfree and mesa versions on that CVS would no compile. I do
have mesa-dri-mach64 and dri-trunk stuff from Sid.
So I load at start up agpgart, ati-agp and the mach64 modules. Agpgart and
mach64 are acknowledged
that probably won't change
much). You could also try mailing Daenzig if you prefer.
The dev packages need to be hacked to fix them as they depend on
specific versions (I don't know of the dri tree can build the dev
packages, need to check).
There shouldn't be any problems with r
ether?
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
> provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I
> changed that so I am not sure what the original package said)
>
> As for
understand. Guarddog?, The qt library?
>
Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I
changed that so I am not sure what the original package said)
As for qt (I thing its the dev, right) IIRC it
It seems to "provide"/"replace" the modules that would cause all those
programs to be removed. There are apparently more recent versions around so
might look at those.
There are alternative mach64 DRI packages, "flgr" which is linked at ATI's
site. These rep
Hi. I think, from the content of this post, that you're replying to
me; but I'm not sure, because your post didn't quote anything for
context (and in general, your posts don't include an "In-Reply-To:"
header, so they don't thread).
If this wasn't a reply to me, sorry . . .
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004
If this module replaces the other three, does it not offer the same "entry
points", functions, or in Java parlance, implements the same interface?
Otherwize, nothing would work.
So if Guarddog or Rosegarden or any othe the tens of others on the list are
calling into the graphics interface, they
iger for this
> dri stuff but I do not believe this is theirs--they offer sources for a
> drm-mach64 which I cannot get to work and will not compile at all for
> 2.6 kernels.
Well, I have no idea where xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 is from. I just know
that it's not from D
This much I realize.
That it might not want to keep the "xmesa-glu" and such, I can understand.
Guarddog?, The qt library?
The only "foreign" sources I have in sources.lst are Daenziger for this dri
stuff but I do not believe this is theirs--they offer sources for a
drm-m
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:09:48PM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> If one installs this one, the following would be removed:
>
> Remv libqt3-mt-dev (3:3.2.3-2 Debian:testing)
> Remv x-window-system (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
> Remv x-window-system-core (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
> Remv xlibmesa-dri (4.3
r a particular package. man apt-cache for more info.
It's hard to be more specific than that, because the package you're
referring to (xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64) doesn't appear to be a Debian
package (that is, it doesn't show up at all at p.d.o).
-c
--
Chris Metzler
If one installs this one, the following would be removed:
Remv libqt3-mt-dev (3:3.2.3-2 Debian:testing)
Remv x-window-system (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Remv x-window-system-core (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Remv xlibmesa-dri (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Remv xlibmesa-glu-dev (4.3.0-5 Debian:unstable)
Rem
On Friday 13 February 2004 01:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2004 20:46,
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Also post the output of lsmod please.
> >
> > Did you mean insmod?
>
> ..no, just type ' lsmod ' to _list_ the modules.
OK "lsmod" not "Ismod" (get it :-))
Here
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:01:36 +0100,
David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 12 February 2004 20:46,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Also post the output of lsmod please.
>
> Did you mean insmod?
..no, just type ' lsmod ' to _list_ the modules.
--
On Thursday 12 February 2004 20:46,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also post the output of lsmod please.
Did you mean insmod? Which module am I trying here?
>
> It looks like something isn't installed right since its loading the
> r128 module instead of the mach64 module. Did yo
fs kernel so figured to make drm-mach64 with
> the sources I have. The make-kpkg kicked about the revisions and changelog of
> the failed kernel build and would bo no farther.
>
> 1. Should I clean that kernel build to get rid of these changes?
Do a make-kpkg clean
> 2. With this o
e.
It looks like something isn't installed right since its loading the
r128 module instead of the mach64 module. Did you load the kernel
module?
It does look like you installed at least some of the packages since xv
is mentioned (did you install the gatos xv drivers before?)
If you have mplaye
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:56:03 +0200
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> 3. The mach64 drm kernel module (in the src package). Take note that this
(...)
I've made a patch for 2.6.2:
http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/~mb197846/patch-2.6.2-mach64.diff.bz2
if somebody would need i
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:56:03 +0200
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> 3. The mach64 drm kernel module (in the src package). Take note that this
(...)
I've made a patch for 2.6.2:
http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/~mb197846/patch-2.6.2-mach64.diff.bz2
if somebody would need i
I have a source tree for 2.4.22. I tried to build a kernel with ext3 built-in
but the build did not complete successfully.
Anyway, I have working 2.4.22-xfs kernel so figured to make drm-mach64 with
the sources I have. The make-kpkg kicked about the revisions and changelog of
the failed kernel
None
0x29 16 dc 1 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2a 16 dc 1 16 0 r . . 5 6 5 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (DRI mach64-0-0-6-branch)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System:
0666
> > > EndSection
> > > <<<<<<<<
> > >
> > > These have been there. The rest of the files, XF86Config and -4 look
> > > to be in order. Most GL apps still do not come up. The Quake window
> > > comes up but does not p
e rest of the files, XF86Config and -4 look
> > to be in order. Most GL apps still do not come up. The Quake window
> > comes up but does not paint its contents, hangs.
> >
> > Do I need the call any of the new modules in /etc/modules. Is there
> > anything else that needs t
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:30:00AM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> <<<
> Make sure you have the following line in the module section
> Load"dri"
>
> Also add the following section if it doesn't exist
> Section "DRI"
> Mode0666
> EndSection
>
>
> These have been th
I need the call any of the new modules in /etc/modules. Is there anything
> else that needs to be touched to make this stuff work?
>
Make sure the mach64 and the agpgart kernel module are loaded and check
that the use count at least on the mach64 goes up to 1 when X is
started.
Try runnin
<<<
Make sure you have the following line in the module section
Load"dri"
Also add the following section if it doesn't exist
Section "DRI"
Mode0666
EndSection
These have been there. The rest of the files, XF86Config and -4 look to be in
order. Most GL apps st
three packages
> > > drm-mach64-module-src
> > > xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
> > > xserver-xfree86-dri-mach64
> >
> > I added the line suggested to the sources.list and got these modules. I also
> > got the xlibmesa ones must in case.
> >
> > Som
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:30:57PM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 February 2004 17:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > There should be three packages
> > drm-mach64-module-src
> > xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
> > xserver-xfree86-dri-mach64
>
> I added th
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 17:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> There should be three packages
> drm-mach64-module-src
> xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
> xserver-xfree86-dri-mach64
I added the line suggested to the sources.list and got these modules. I also
got the xlibmesa ones must in case
Hi,
..from my tentative 'cat /etc/apt/sources.list':
# XFree86 4.3:
# deb http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/experimental/ ./
# is gone, but where???
# http://people.debian.org/~nobse/deprecated/experimental/xfree86/ ?
# Also I get my DRI-Mach64 drivers from Dänzer's u
Hi!
I have an old Pentium 90 that I use as a router/etc machine between my
intranet and the cable tv network. It has an integrated Mach64 graphics
card, on which I am trying to run a framebuffer. I am using a 2.2.25
kernel, mostly because 2.2 has worked great so far, and 2.4 is bigger (it
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:29:41PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
>Hey,
>
>X apps shouldn't run any faster at all. In fact, X won't even use the
>framebuffer unless you use the framebuffer server, which is probably a
>bad idea unless you absolutely have to.
>
>Cameron Matheson >
Thanks for that
Hey,
X apps shouldn't run any faster at all. In fact, X won't even use the
framebuffer unless you use the framebuffer server, which is probably a
bad idea unless you absolutely have to.
Cameron Matheson
Patrick Kirk wrote:
Hi all,
Do X apps work faster if you enable the framebuffer in t
Hi all,
Do X apps work faster if you enable the framebuffer in the kernel? I
see references to things like directfb and fbset from time to time but
I have no idea whether or not they are worth doing.
Comments appreciated!
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
I have been having problem upgrading to XFREE86-4.
I use ATI Mach64 GX(PCI) on my system.
X fail to start anything beyond 15bpp.
X starts below 8bpp but screen has very noisy color assignment (looks
like color assignment table is corrupted.) I can see icons though.
XFree86.0.log has
works and what you had to do!
> I'm trying to upgrade my system to XF86 4.0.1, but the xserver for my
> video card (ATI rage pro, mach64 chipset) doesn't seem to be there. The
> XF86 website says that there is accelerated support for the mach64
> chipset in 4.0.1, so why can
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:48:06PM +0600, David Fenstermacher wrote:
> hi,
> I'm trying to upgrade my system to XF86 4.0.1, but the xserver for my
> video card (ATI rage pro, mach64 chipset) doesn't seem to be there. The
> XF86 website says that there is accelerated
On 10 Dec 2000, David Fenstermacher wrote:
> hi,
> I'm trying to upgrade my system to XF86 4.0.1, but the xserver for my
> video card (ATI rage pro, mach64 chipset) doesn't seem to be there. The
> XF86 website says that there is accelerated support for the mach64
> chips
hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system to XF86 4.0.1, but the xserver for my
video card (ATI rage pro, mach64 chipset) doesn't seem to be there. The
XF86 website says that there is accelerated support for the mach64
chipset in 4.0.1, so why can't I find the xserver for it? is the deb
Hi
We were trying to install the mach64 xserver, but we haven't
found it. We searched the Mailinglist archive and found out,
that the package is broken. So, does somebody can help, and
say us, how does we can install it? The framebuffer device is
not working correctly. Does somebody had al
come * ICQ#: 12597522 *
> / /\_/\ \ \_/^\_/ ;)*[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
> WW WW*
I upgraded to potato (dunno if that makes any difference, I
was upgrading anyway), installed the mach64-server, and ran
xf86config a few times, trying out differen
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 05:00:31PM -0500, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> [...]
> > Does any one know what might be happening? I'd be more than happy to
> > provide you with further information (file listings and stuff like that).
> > The m
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
[...]
> Does any one know what might be happening? I'd be more than happy to
> provide you with further information (file listings and stuff like that).
> The motherboard is a Pentium MMX compatible with PCI and ISA bus and with an
>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with ATI Mach64 card
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.x
Organization:
Summary:
Keywords:
Hi!
This is the second SVGA/PCI card i try on my computer, and the
second time I encounter this problem. First of all, gpm stops working. The
mouse is on
Hello everybody!
I installed Debian 2.0 and tried to configure X for my ASUS
PCI-AV264CT card.
I used the graphical tool XF86Setup and choosed the mach64 Xserver.
X starts up correctly with good resolution and color-depth BUT:
everything is very slow!
Scrolling and moving a window is very very
M.C. Vernon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Does svgalibwork with such cards? Mine is an ATIXpert98
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthew
>
I couldn't get my Xpression+ TV2PC card to work with the Mach64
chipset defined, but it worked just fine if I defined the chipset
as VESA (up to 800x600).
-Mitch
Dear all,
Does svgalibwork with such cards? Mine is an ATIXpert98
Thanks,
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society
Selwyn College Computer Support
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/8841/
http://www.cam.ac.uk/CambUniv/Societies/tolkien/
Are there any problems known with the Mach64 driver? I am getting
segfaults when running Quake2 and LinCity...
Regards, Ruud.
On Mon, Aug 17, 1998 at 06:07:12PM +0200, Jens Ch. Lisner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> one stupid question:
>
> Does svgalib support mach64 (it supports mach32)?
The docs seem to indicate that although the code is there, it doesn't work :-(
I've just uploaded 1.3.0 which
Hi,
one stupid question:
Does svgalib support mach64 (it supports mach32)?
Jens
> ...so, I figure I'll try to upgrade to hamm (?). Ran the autoup.sh
> program (seemed to work except for a reported error with "slang"),
> then tried to run dselect via ftp (which has worked great for me
> several times) updated using the frozen_main (etc) - worked fine,
> updated info on app
ure
quality. I tried the new s.u.s.e. mach64 server and it worked
better (great resolution and picture during configuration) , but not
good enough (had i/o problem with mouse - server wouldn't run
after exiting from the configuration program (where, by the way,
the mouse worked perfectly).
>From a search of the list archives looking for info on
the Mach64 server, I've seen references to the fact that some
of the recent ATI boards ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 3D RAGE II+ chips) don't
work with the Mach64 server supplied with Debian 1.3.1.r6. One
reply indicated that downloadin
I just upgraded to XFree86 3.3.2, hoping that the noise problems
with my ATI [EMAIL PROTECTED] (4MB, AGP) would be fixed. (The noise appears
as a evenly scattered white and black pixels to the left of a window,
whenever its contents is changed/updated.) The problem wasn't gone, but
I found this com
Whenever I move a window, update data in a window (for example, scrolling
text in xterm or rxvt) I get "static" pixel noise to the right of the
window. It appears as randomly placed "flicking" lines (3-6 * 1 pixel
big). The noise appears in all resolutions, and with the
XF86_Mach64 3.3, 3.3.1 and X
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> I am trying to set up a new machine for someone else. The machine came with
> an ATI 3D Xpression 2MB card.
>
> Using Debian 1.3.1, I can't get any X11 server other than vga16 to work. The
> Mach64 server seems to splits the screen verticall
I am trying to set up a new machine for someone else. The machine came with
an ATI 3D Xpression 2MB card.
Using Debian 1.3.1, I can't get any X11 server other than vga16 to work. The
Mach64 server seems to splits the screen vertically a couple of times. X
-probeonly says
unknown ATI (8
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
