On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:36:43AM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> So .... tachlis (Heb. conclusion)?
> 
> This is a bit confusing and trying to make use of it risky, I suppose. I can 
> contact Guarddog's author about his gl calls but there are 10s of others on 
> that list as well.
> 
> Can it be done or wait till the Daenzig can get a more interoperable package 
> together?
> 

I think I can get enough space somewhere to host the dri packages for a
few days if you want. That should be more friendly to Guarddog (changed
dependency listing, also newer version but that probably won't change
much). You could also try mailing Daenzig if you prefer.

The dev packages need to be hacked to fix them as they depend on
specific versions (I don't know of the dri tree can build the dev
packages, need to check).

There shouldn't be any problems with running Guarddog with
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64. I ran UT and return to castle wolfenstein on
it and I believe they abuse the code much more then Guarddog.

> 
> On Wednesday 17 March 2004 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:
> > Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
> > provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I
> > changed that so I am not sure what the original package said)
> >
> > As for qt (I thing its the dev, right) IIRC it depends on
> > xlibmesa-gl-dev which depends on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl
> > which is removed. Forcing this does work ok since the replacement
> > library does provide all the hooks, I just hacked the packages though
> > (also upgraded to cvs version, which should be upgraded again ;-)
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
>  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to