On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:40:29AM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:52:31 +0100 > David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This much I realize. > > > > That it might not want to keep the "xmesa-glu" and such, I can > > understand. Guarddog?, The qt library? >
Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I changed that so I am not sure what the original package said) As for qt (I thing its the dev, right) IIRC it depends on xlibmesa-gl-dev which depends on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl which is removed. Forcing this does work ok since the replacement library does provide all the hooks, I just hacked the packages though (also upgraded to cvs version, which should be upgraded again ;-) > To use just one example, a simple visit to packages.debian.org would show > you that guarddog in unstable depends on xlibmesa-gl. If the package > you're installing requires the removal of xlibmesa-gl, it's also going > to require the removal of everything that depends on it. > > > > The only "foreign" sources I have in sources.lst are Daenziger for this > > dri stuff but I do not believe this is theirs--they offer sources for a > > drm-mach64 which I cannot get to work and will not compile at all for > > 2.6 kernels. > > Well, I have no idea where xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 is from. I just know > that it's not from Debian. p.d.o doesn't know anything about it. > > -c > > -- > Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (remove "snip-me." to email) > > "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I > have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
