On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:15:41PM +, jindam.v...@disroot.org wrote:
> libreoffice tracker [1] contains NEW/experimental: 1:7.5.0~rc1-1
> what is NEW/experimental in debian tracker?
> is it possible to install from NEW/experimental?
If you are very lucky, yes, but most of the time: n
libreoffice tracker [1] contains NEW/experimental: 1:7.5.0~rc1-1
what is NEW/experimental in debian tracker?
is it possible to install from NEW/experimental?
if so, how?
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice
regards,
jindam, vani
Gnus/5.13 Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
toots: @jindam_vani
On Tue 06 Sep 2022 at 16:32:30 +, jindam, vani wrote:
> i want to install gv from experimental.
> bug if new version is released in
> unstable, will apt full-upgrade will
> install from unstable?
Yes.
> my plan: enable experimental repo on
> sources.list. update my ex
i want to install gv from experimental.
bug if new version is released in
unstable, will apt full-upgrade will
install from unstable?
my plan: enable experimental repo on
sources.list. update my existing gv
using apt -t experimental install gv
regards,
jindam, vani
wrote:
> > > On Vi, 14 ian 22, 15:37:21, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > > > So clang-13 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4 testing is in testing/unstable,
> > > > > but the changelog says:
> >
> >
> > > > llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) experimental; urgency=medium
> > >
> > > Because despite what the changelog or the version string say, the
> > > maintainer uploaded that version to unstable:
> > >
> > > https://tracker.debi
log says:
> > >
> > > llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) experimental; urgency=medium
> >
> > Because despite what the changelog or the version string say, the
> > maintainer uploaded that version to unstable:
> >
> > https://tracker.debian.org/
On Vi, 14 ian 22, 15:37:21, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > So clang-13 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4 testing is in testing/unstable,
> > but the changelog says:
> >
> > llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) e
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
So clang-13 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4 testing is in testing/unstable,
but the changelog says:
llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) experimental; urgency=medium
Because despite what the changelog or the version string say, the
2-1~exp1 experimental ftp.debian.org
clang-13:amd64/testing 1:13.0.0-9+b2 upgradeable to 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4
So clang-13 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4 testing is in testing/unstable,
but the changelog says:
llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) experimental; urgency=medium
* Fix the cmake file with
experimental so far
Reply-To: Axel Beckert , 968...@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: reportbug 7.7.0
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: w...@packages.debian.org
Please remove wicd from Debian Unstable (and only Unstable). The
version in Debian Unstable depends on Python 2.x and it doesn't
On Du, 26 iul 20, 20:08:42, Brian wrote:
> A package enters experimental. It fixes bug X. Can the bug now be
> recorded as closed in Debian?
In general the version of the package with the fix should be included
when closing a bug (regardless of release), or adjusted later with
'
On 7/26/20 10:37 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2020-07-26 20:08 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
>> A package enters experimental. It fixes bug X. Can the bug now be
>> recorded as closed in Debian?
>
> Yes. However, the bug will not be archived before the fix arrives in
&g
On 2020-07-26 20:08 +0100, Brian wrote:
> A package enters experimental. It fixes bug X. Can the bug now be
> recorded as closed in Debian?
Yes. However, the bug will not be archived before the fix arrives in
unstable, unless it only affected experimental in the first place.
A package enters experimental. It fixes bug X. Can the bug now be
recorded as closed in Debian?
--
Brian.
Hi,
Sure the reason is clearly there:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vte2.91&suite=experimental
I don't know why I was so confused between the apt output (and also
using synaptic) regarding this? But probably be it was too late for me
at that time :-)
Thanks!
> Hi,
>
> Since the last upload of version 0.57.90-1 to experimental on the
> 21th August (
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/vte2.91), the packages are not in the
> scope of
> apt (deb https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-
> free).
>
&
Hi,
Since the last upload of version 0.57.90-1 to experimental on the 21th August (
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/vte2.91), the packages are not in the scope of
apt (deb https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free).
But regarding the https://packages.debian.org
st last
time I tried it).
> I am using zoneminder here in stretch. I saw you uploaded several new
> versions 1.32.x to experimental. I am just wondering if you intend to
> upload a new version to sid before the release of buster or do the
> versions 1.32.x have severe limitations over
the list, I discovered brainparty,
which I did not know before.
I am using zoneminder here in stretch. I saw you uploaded several new versions
1.32.x to experimental. I am just wondering if you intend to upload a new
version to sid before the release of buster or do the versions 1.32.x have
On Monday, 9 January 2017 20:28:46 CET Brian wrote:
> What will happen to a bug report which is clearly an upstream issue and
> tagged as such which is sent to the BTS?
I forward manually upstream issue to upstream bug tracker. That process does
not scale and is often late...
All the best
--
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 09 Jan 2017 at 21:00:17 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > Please report any upstream issue on upstream bug tracker [4]. Packaging
> > issues
> > can be reported with Debian BTS as usual.
>
> What will happen to a bug report which is clearly an upstream
On Mon 09 Jan 2017 at 21:00:17 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
[Snip]
> Please report any upstream issue on upstream bug tracker [4]. Packaging
> issues
> can be reported with Debian BTS as usual.
What will happen to a bug report which is clearly an upstream issue and
tagged as such which is se
Hello
After a pause of 2 years, lcdproc [1] project is restarting. lcdproc is a LCD
display driver useful for Pc based home cinema. It supports quite a lot of LCD
displays.
Upstream has prepared a release candidate that is now available as a Debian
package [2] on experimental [3].
Please
Andrew Puschak wrote:
> I inherited some Debian servers running 7 wheezy and am upgrading to 8
> jessie. During apt-get upgrade (after setting /etc/apt/sources.list to
> jessie) I get a less command displaying changelogs as seen below with
> the first package being nagios-nrpe. I also get a list
s as seen below with
> the first package being nagios-nrpe. I also get a list of packages
> during apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> Following the same procedure on another server did not display these
> unstable/experimental packages. However, checking
> /var/cache/apt/archives I don&#x
during apt-get dist-upgrade.
Following the same procedure on another server did not display these
unstable/experimental packages. However, checking /var/cache/apt/archives I
don't see the unstable and experimental versions that the changlog is referring
to.
Where is the changelog seeing
Yesterday, during an upgrade of my Debian/unstable machine (with the
new libstdc++6 in particular), aptitude upgraded a package (powertop)
from unstable to experimental (see aptitude log in attachment),
and I wasn't aware of this until now. I thought that by default,
experimental packages wer
Experimental is not a complete release. It's whatever the developers
want to make available for people to try but that they don't think is
ready for Unstable. You could probably set up a complete OS including
the DE of your choice using it but you are likely to spend most of your
time
packages from experimental
# apt-get -t experimental my-buggy-package
It's pretty handy, some of the stuff there is buggy/untested, some of
it is just waiting for transition. Very good if you need newer kernel
or mesa drivers.
Great!
Thanks for that.
Quite different to what I thought it wa
On 2015-06-24 23:36, Jape Person wrote:
On 06/24/2015 08:51 AM, Weaver wrote:
Greetings all.
I have a spare unstable system that I was thinking of jumping up to
experimental to play with.
Is experimental strictly non-gui, or is there a recommended light
desktop that can sit on top?
Thanks for
On 06/24/2015 08:51 AM, Weaver wrote:
Greetings all.
I have a spare unstable system that I was thinking of jumping up to
experimental to play with.
Is experimental strictly non-gui, or is there a recommended light
desktop that can sit on top?
Thanks for any advice to this slow and ancient
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 23:11 +1000, Weaver wrote:
> Right!
>
> In that case, it sounds as though /etc/apt/sources.list is arranged
> differently then.
> Any clues in regard to that?
Not really, by default it is pinned so you need to explicitly tell it
to grab packages from expe
On 2015-06-24 23:03, Sven Hartge wrote:
Weaver wrote:
I have a spare unstable system that I was thinking of jumping up to
experimental to play with. Is experimental strictly non-gui, or is
there a recommended light desktop that can sit on top? Thanks for any
advice to this slow and ancient
Weaver wrote:
> I have a spare unstable system that I was thinking of jumping up to
> experimental to play with. Is experimental strictly non-gui, or is
> there a recommended light desktop that can sit on top? Thanks for any
> advice to this slow and ancient learner.
Experi
Greetings all.
I have a spare unstable system that I was thinking of jumping up to
experimental to play with.
Is experimental strictly non-gui, or is there a recommended light
desktop that can sit on top?
Thanks for any advice to this slow and ancient learner.
Cheers!
Weaver.
--
"It i
1.0.0. My solution:
> Upgrading to Cinnamon 2.4 from the experimental branch.
>
> But now Cinnamon is always crashing. I attached the .xsession-errors
> file, but I am not sure what the core of the problem is so I don't want
> to report it yet. There is no "rogue" p
Hello everyone,
I installed Debian 8 Cinnamon on my new Dell XPS 13 2015 and to get the
new Intel driver I upgraded to Sid. But now cinnamon-control-center had
a problem with the network-manager being >= 1.0.0. My solution:
Upgrading to Cinnamon 2.4 from the experimental branch.
But
c/apt/sources.list and now have the following:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing-updates main contrib
> non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib
> non-free deb http://cdn.debi
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://cdn.debian.net/debian experimental main
Following the instructions, I installed Iceweasel with the -t option
to pin it from the 'ex
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> El 10/06/2014 02:25, "David Glover-Aoki" escribió:
>>
>> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>>
>> How can I list all the packages currently installed from ex
On Ma, 10 iun 14, 15:19:18, David Glover-Aoki wrote:
> Here's the output I get from apt-show-versions, for a package I know
> is from experimental:
Please show the output of 'apt-cache policy deluge-common'.
> deluge-common 1.3.6-1 newer than version in archive
This
Sorry for html ... ( how can I skip HTML from Gmail Android app?)
El 10/06/2014 02:25, "David Glover-Aoki" escribió:
>
> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>
> How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental?
id not reveal the existence of
"apt-show-versions".
Here's the output I get from apt-show-versions, for a package I know is from
experimental:
deluge-common 1.3.6-1 newer than version in archive
This is kinda disappointing, it doesn't actually say where it's from, just
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Filip wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>>
>> aptitude search -F "%p %t %v" "?narrow(?installed,?archive(unstable)"
>
> I added a missing closing brace
Sorry...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Tom H writes:
>>
>> When I run:
>>
>> $ aptitude search "~S ~i ~Aunstable"
>>
>> I get a lot more than only the packages that where installed from sid
>> though. The installed packages for which the version in Jessie and Sid
>> is the same are included in the list too.
>>
>> Is it possible to cre
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Filip wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:25 PM, David Glover-Aoki
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>>>
>>> How can I lis
Tom H writes:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:25 PM, David Glover-Aoki
> wrote:
>> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>>
>> How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental?
>
> aptitude search "~S
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:25 PM, David Glover-Aoki wrote:
> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>
> How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental?
aptitude search "~S ~i ~Aexperimental"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On 2014-06-10 02:25 +0200, David Glover-Aoki wrote:
> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>
> How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental?
$ aptitude search "~S ~i ~Aexperimental"
HTH,
Sven
--
To UNSU
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 05:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:25 -0700, David Glover-Aoki wrote:
> > I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
> >
> > How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:25 -0700, David Glover-Aoki wrote:
> I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
>
> How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental?
It can't harm to do some research ;).
https://packages.debian.org/
I'm running wheezy but have some packages installed from experimental.
How can I list all the packages currently installed from experimental?
--
David Glover-Aoki | https://david.gloveraoki.net/contact
PGP key 5518C7DE | Amateur Radio KJ6TLX
signature.asc
Description: Message signed
some 3.12 packages only available in experimental. Is there a
policy when these packages are transfered to unstable?
Also what package(s) holds the Gnome 3.12 transition?
You can track the transitions that are happening in Debian at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/ , there are a planned
Hello,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Floris wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> The Debian Gnome maintainers has almost packed Gnome 3.12. After the systemd
> + Gnome sprint last April a lot of Gnome packages have the 3.12 version. But
> there are some 3.12 packages only available in experi
Hey,
The Debian Gnome maintainers has almost packed Gnome 3.12. After the
systemd + Gnome sprint last April a lot of Gnome packages have the 3.12
version. But there are some 3.12 packages only available in experimental.
Is there a policy when these packages are transfered to unstable
A right click on the toolbar > Check "Menu Bar" and Firefox gets back
the menus, including the "View" menu with the "Page Sytle" option.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https:
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 13:00 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > If somebody should use this version of Iceweasel, do you know how to
> > select the page style?
>
> No idea where to look for that. But you can check yourself
I did and I didn't find it. I also made Internet researches and didn't
fi
Am Samstag, 3. Mai 2014, 06:54:14 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> Hi,
>
> does somebody use Iceweasel from experimental? On my Arch I upgraded to
> Firefox 29.0, on Debian I will stay with Iceweasel < 29.0, but the day
> might come, when there is no choice anymore and we all need to use
Hi,
does somebody use Iceweasel from experimental? On my Arch I upgraded to
Firefox 29.0, on Debian I will stay with Iceweasel < 29.0, but the day
might come, when there is no choice anymore and we all need to use >=
29.0.
If somebody should use this version of Iceweasel, do you know
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>
>> Have you run "apt-get update" and {,dist-}upgraded?
>>
>> Are you using pinning? Are the liborc-* packages pinned to testing?
>>
>> What's the output of:
>> apt-conf dum
sid main contrib non-free
>>
>> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>>
>> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
>> deb http://ftp.debian.org/de
bian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://www.deb
PPS: The subject "Setting up apt when have mixture of testing, sid and
experimental" isn't an evidence that you're really aware that you
understand that you mix and what it does mean to mix. Regarding to your
question you completely don't know what you're doing.
p.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
testing, aka jessie
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
"
src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
>
>
sting main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free
deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org sid main
# deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org testing main
# Bitlbee
deb http://code.bitlbee.org/d
Recent apt-get upgrade was pulling everything from "experimental/main." There
may be a package or two that I use from experimental-snapshots for kde, but
otherwise I am plain-vanilla Sid.
Wh
features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental, like f2fs and
> btrfs. I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and if they are
> stable enough for day-to-day use.
3.7-trunk-amd64, 3.8-trunk-amd64 and 3.8 and 3.9 upto rc3 all fine here on
different machine.
However your m
t kernel, but I would like to play with some of
> > the newer features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental, like
> > f2fs and btrfs. I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and
> > if they are stable enough for day-to-day use.
> >
> > Thanks,
&
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Joel Roth:
> > Dear List,
> >
> > ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
> > file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
> > *have* to be decoded? I was thinking the
Joel Roth:
> Dear List,
>
> ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
> file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
> *have* to be decoded? I was thinking there might
> be some kind of pass-through option.
Yes, you can try '-acodec copy'.
J
Dear List,
ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
*have* to be decoded? I was thinking there might
be some kind of pass-through option.
The behavior of ffmpeg and avconv appears to be
identical.
$ avconv -acodec aac -strict
Dear List,
ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
*have* to be decoded? I was thinking there might
be some kind of pass-through option.
The behavior of ffmpeg and avconv appears to be
identical.
$ avconv -acodec aac -strict
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 04:40 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Or, there are a gazillion VM solutions available for precisely this
> purpose.
For testing a FS a virtual machine is fine, but often you need a "real"
install even for playing, that's why I've got a multi-boot with that
many Linux. I'm not
On 3/13/2013 8:00 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
...
> play with ...
> features ...like f2fs and btrfs.
...
> I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and if they are stable
> enough for day-to-day use.
I see a major disconnect here. Playing with something new is not
day-day use. You can buy
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 03:02 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> Some of the 'buntus use 3.4, don't they?
Packages for Quantal are already > 3.4, but it's unstable. However, it
isn't unstable regarding to the kernel. I also build kernels myself for
Ubuntu, it still is buggy as hell. On Arch Linux everythin
wer features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental, like
> f2fs and btrfs. I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and
> if they are stable enough for day-to-day use.
At the moment I'm not using Debian, but I use 3.7 and 3.6-rt kernels.
They are stable.
--
To UNSUB
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 21:12 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> I wouldn't use any of the newer file systems until they've been around
Oops, that's another story, the kernels I use are stable, but I use ext3
and ext4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
> From: Johan Grönqvist [mailto:johan.gronqv...@gmail.com]
> 2013-03-14 02:00, Brad Alexander skrev:
> > [...] sid is still sporting
> > the 3.2.x kernel.
> > [...] I would like to play with some of the
> > newer features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:24:19AM +0100, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
>...
> I considered installing 3.8 from experimental, but that one seems to
> move from the old initramfs tools to something called dracut, so I
> decided to stay with 3.7, as it works for me.
I'm running:
zi
2013-03-14 02:00, Brad Alexander skrev:
[...] sid is still sporting
the 3.2.x kernel.
[...] I would like to play with some of the
newer features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental, [...]
I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and if they
are stable enough for day-to-day use
wer
> features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental, like f2fs and btrfs.
> I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and if they are stable
> enough for day-to-day use.
I typically build vanilla sources from upstream. I try to pick one of
Greg's long-term versions, and j
Sorry. Didn't check the reply field.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brad Alexander
Date: Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: newer kernels from experimental?
To: g...@dalefamily.org
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> I wouldn't use any
r 3.x kernels from experimental, like
f2fs and btrfs. I was wondering if anyone is running any of them, and
if they are stable enough for day-to-day use.
Thanks,
--b
I wouldn't use any of the newer file systems until they've been around
in use for a couple of years. You can use btrfs now
While it isn't quite getting long in the tooth, sid is still sporting the
3.2.x kernel. Now as I recall, Greg KH said that this would be the next
long term support kernel, but I would like to play with some of the newer
features from the later 3.x kernels from experimental, like f2fs and btr
On Jo, 27 dec 12, 23:08:25, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> >
> No, vlc packages are not in the official repos.
> Now I get it.
Doesn't matter if the repository is official or not, but only if it's
available.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:26 AM, piruthiviraj natarajan
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Chris Bannister
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:15:53PM +0530, piruthiviraj nat
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:26 AM, piruthiviraj natarajan
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Chris Bannister
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:15:53PM +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
root@localhost:~# cat /etc/apt/apt.c
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Chris Bannister
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:15:53PM +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> >>
> >> root@localhost:~# cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
> >> // Recommends are as of now still abused in many packages
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:15:53PM +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
>>
>> root@localhost:~# cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
>> // Recommends are as of now still abused in many packages
>
> If you know of any packages where this is occuring, then
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:15:53PM +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
> Is there any way to clean the apt cache for the packages that I am not
> currently using?
>
> I tried using this config
> root@localhost:~# cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
> APT::Clean-Installed "0";
> // auto-remove breaks on meta pa
t; APT::Install-Suggests "0";
> Debug::pkgAutoRemove "0";
>
>
> Acquire::PDiffs "0";
>
> // Remove apt unauthenticated warnings
> APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated "0";
> root@localhost:~#
> But after doing an apt-get autoclean, it left some p
;;
root@localhost:~#
But after doing an apt-get autoclean, it left some packages in the cache,
for example it doesnt remove the packages that I downloaded from the
experimental repos.
Is there anything obvious that I am missing here?
Any Experimental users who can tell me what the kernel numbers mean in
the Experimental repository? I see flaws in the kernels 3.4, and 3.5,
and wonder if other people see them too, or if they even care to
report problems because those kernels are, well, Experimental. I'm
running a system
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov:
>>
>> Downgrading grub packages to 1.99-23 from unstable did the trick, as I
>> thought.
>> System boots and works fine.
>
> Ok, good.
>
> Would be interesting to know what the er
2012/9/28 Martin Steigerwald
> Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov:
> > Downgrading grub packages to 1.99-23 from unstable did the trick, as I
> > thought.
> > System boots and works fine.
>
> Ok, good.
>
> Would be interesting to know what the error was.
>
> In case you spar
Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov:
> Downgrading grub packages to 1.99-23 from unstable did the trick, as I
> thought.
> System boots and works fine.
Ok, good.
Would be interesting to know what the error was.
In case you spare any free time, I´d look in the shell script up
Downgrading grub packages to 1.99-23 from unstable did the trick, as I
thought.
System boots and works fine.
--
Best regards,
Valery Mamonov.
2012/9/27 Martin Steigerwald
> Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 schrieb Valery Mamonov:
> > 2012/9/27 Tom H
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Valery Mamonov
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm using mixed unstable/experimenta
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
