Hi,
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Weird. Is it really an up-to-date box? I was told, newer e2progs do even
> hide the journal afterwards if they get a chance, ie. running e2fsck on
> an umounted partition.
Yes, it's up-to-date. Here's Stephen's explanation:
e2fs
#include
Michael Meskes wrote on Wed May 01, 2002 um 09:55:57AM:
> I even tried removing it thinking of an old file as you mentioned in you
> other mail. But after reboot the system complains about a missing
> journal and goes to ext2. After recreating .journal via tune2fs it works
> well again a
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 08:45:37PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > These two partitions were the ones moved to ext3. And ls -a shows
> > .journal in / but not in /disks/oldhome.
>
> Weird. Which kernel and which e2progs has been used to create the
Kernel 2.4.18, e2fsprogs 1.27-2.
> journal? Did y
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did a mkinitrd to create a new initrd, changed my lilo.conf, ran
> lilo and rebooted, but nothing changed. The ext3 module is loaded but
> unused and /proc/mounts says /dev/root is mounted as ext2.
>Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>If y
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did a mkinitrd to create a new initrd, changed my lilo.conf, ran
> lilo and rebooted, but nothing changed. The ext3 module is loaded but
> unused and /proc/mounts says /dev/root is mounted as ext2.
If you are using the -386 flavour then this is a
#include
Michael Meskes wrote on Tue Apr 30, 2002 um 01:23:52PM:
> > Recent Ext3 driver hides the file, no matter how it was created. If you
> > still see it, it is either a bug, or the partition is mounted with Ext2.
>
> cat /proc/mounts says:
>
> /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0
> /dev/hda7 /disks/old
Sorry, hit reply to fast, my last mail was incomplete.
I just did a mkinitrd to create a new initrd, changed my lilo.conf, ran
lilo and rebooted, but nothing changed. The ext3 module is loaded but
unused and /proc/mounts says /dev/root is mounted as ext2.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-M
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:22:48PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> It should work with any of Herberts 2.4.x-* kernels,-bf2.4 and
> 2.2.20-udma100-ext3. IIRC you have to rebuild the initrd (for
> initrd-based kernels) once.
> How did you check this? Do not trust "mount", look in /proc/mounts.
I did
#include
Michael Meskes wrote on Tue Apr 30, 2002 um 11:48:42AM:
> - Is it possible to use ext3 for the root partition with the stock
> debian kernel? My ext3 roots work nicely with a hand made kernel but
It should work with any of Herberts 2.4.x-* kernels,-bf2.4 and
2.2.20-udma100-ext3. IIRC
Hi,
I'm experiencing with ext3 it appears I have some questions that maybe
anyone of you can answer:
- Is it possible to use ext3 for the root partition with the stock
debian kernel? My ext3 roots work nicely with a hand made kernel but
the stock Debian one just mounts the partition ext2. Isn
10 matches
Mail list logo
