> > > bg_color=FAF0E6
> > > geometry=128x30
> > >
> > > and *.mlterm/font* should read:
> > >
> > > DEFAULT=monospace-20
>
> > Yes, the problem is that the configuration has no effect. My .mlterm/main
> > fil
gt; > and *.mlterm/font* should read:
> >
> > DEFAULT=monospace-20
> Yes, the problem is that the configuration has no effect. My .mlterm/main
> file constains:
>
> geometry = 128x30
> bg_color = #FAF0E6
> bg_color = FAF0E6
>
> and my font fil
you did is just the wrong syntax.
...
> So, my reading of that could be that *.mlterm/main* should read:
>
> bg_color=FAF0E6
> geometry=128x30
>
> and *.mlterm/font* should read:
>
> DEFAULT=monospace-20
>
> But if I could read that information (an
hat seek is
> >geometry = 128x30
> >font = monospace-20
> >bg = FAF0E6
>
> Maybe your man page is different.
> https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/mlterm/mlterm.1.en.html shows
> the manpage as in Bookworm. There, under the section "CONFIGURATION"
ne options, but not syntax for a
condfiguration file.
What seek is
geometry = 128x30
font = monospace-20
bg = FAF0E6
Maybe your man page is different.
https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/mlterm/mlterm.1.en.html shows the
manpage as in Bookworm. There, under the section "CONFIGURAT
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:35:24AM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:45:02AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > My attemtpts configure mlterm have no effect. For exaJmple, I create a file
> > .mlterm/font with the line line: DEFAULT=20x28.
> > And in the file .m lterm/backgro
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:35:24AM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:45:02AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > My attemtpts configure mlterm have no effect. For exaJmple, I create a file
> > .mlterm/font with the line line: DEFAULT=20x28.
> > And in the file .m lterm/backgro
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:35:24AM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:45:02AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > My attemtpts configure mlterm have no effect. For exaJmple, I
> > create a file .mlterm/font with the line line: DEFAULT=20x28. And
> > in the file .m lterm/backgr
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:45:02AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> My attemtpts configure mlterm have no effect. For exaJmple, I create a file
> .mlterm/font with the line line: DEFAULT=20x28.
> And in the file .m lterm/background is the line bg_color=linen
>
>
Well,
what you did is just the wrong
My attemtpts configure mlterm have no effect. For exaJmple, I create a file
.mlterm/font with the line line: DEFAULT=20x28.
And in the file .m lterm/background is the line bg_color=linen
--
Haines Brown
On 13/10/24 08:36, William Torrez Corea wrote:
I configure a file for example /etc/network/interfaces.d
Configure the file, save and exit but the changes are not made. I need
to make a second configuration.
For me it is a waste of time.
What happened?
--
With kindest regards, William
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:36:34 -0600
William Torrez Corea wrote:
> I configure a file for example /etc/network/interfaces.d
/etc/network/interfaces.d is a directory; I suspect you mean you write
a configuration file in /etc/network/interfaces.d.
>
> Configure the file, save and exi
William Torrez Corea wrote:
> I configure a file for example /etc/network/interfaces.d
>
> Configure the file, save and exit but the changes are not made. I need to
> make a second configuration.
Do you mean that the file was not saved to disk, or were you
expecting something el
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 18:36:34 -0600, William Torrez Corea wrote:
> I configure a file for example /etc/network/interfaces.d
That's a directory, not a file.
> Configure the file, save and exit but the changes are not made. I need to
> make a second configuration.
>
> For
I configure a file for example /etc/network/interfaces.d
Configure the file, save and exit but the changes are not made. I need to
make a second configuration.
For me it is a waste of time.
What happened?
--
With kindest regards, William.
*Larry Wall invented a messy programming language
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Jens Schmidt wrote:
>> On Debian testing I've been bitten by the systemd upgrade and the
>> systemd package split recently, rendering my dracut-LUKS-based
>> system unbootable. I know that my warranty is void since I'm on
>> testing, but both these issues would have been much
pport snapshots have their
own set of problems.
On the other hand, I can say it is a feature of NixOS, I saw it last
week when somebody asked me “I made a mistake, our VM doesn't boot
anymore, can I access the GRUB console?” and they just rebooted on the
previous configuration. But NixOS is not Debian, it is barely Unix as
far as I can see.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Jens Schmidt wrote:
> On Debian testing I've been bitten by the systemd upgrade and the
> systemd package split recently, rendering my dracut-LUKS-based
> system unbootable. I know that my warranty is void since I'm on
> testing, but both these issues would have been much easier to cope
> with if
On 2024-07-10, Jens Schmidt wrote:
> So I thought that there might be some automatism like this:
>
> If the currently used kernel and initramfs have been in use
> already N times and if the boot time has been lower then M
> minutes each time (and if some other conditions are fulfilled),
>
On Debian testing I've been bitten by the systemd upgrade and the
systemd package split recently, rendering my dracut-LUKS-based
system unbootable. I know that my warranty is void since I'm on
testing, but both these issues would have been much easier to cope
with if there had been some good backu
Hey,
Thank you for your reply Sven, and sorry for the belated response.
Here is my setup now:
sources.list
```
# stable
deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main contrib
non-free-firmware non-free
deb-src https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main contrib
non-free-firmware non-fr
t would contain sets of
packages to install (or uninstall), configuration files (including but
not limited to /etc/), and possibly arbitrary scripts to execute upon
installation (e.g. to make more precise edits to configs).
I would like to store these in some central, git-controlled location
where
Hi all,
Sorry to resurrect an old-ish thread, but I am facing the exact same
task, minus the know-how.
Basically I am looking to pre-configure a number of Debian setups -
let's say, "server", "laptop" and "PC" - that would contain sets of
packages to install
On 06/17/2024 09:33 AM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I created a new, _apparently_ identical, panel.
*HOWEVER*
it displays something for each item open/active in *ANY* workspace.
How do I get back to displaying something for each item open/active in
the *CURRENT* workspace?
Th
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I created a new, _apparently_ identical, panel.
> *HOWEVER*
> it displays something for each item open/active in *ANY* workspace.
>
> How do I get back to displaying something for each item open/active in
> the *CURRENT* workspace?
This is the "window list" applet that
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:35:17 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> ENVIRONMENT:
> Running Debian 9.13 with MATE 1.16.3 on DELL LATITUDE E6410 laptop
> an external monitor is used via ARandR 0.1.9
> Using SeaMonkey 2.49.4 for browser and email
> Yes. Multiple rev's behind. Doing housekeepi
ENVIRONMENT:
Running Debian 9.13 with MATE 1.16.3 on DELL LATITUDE E6410 laptop
an external monitor is used via ARandR 0.1.9
Using SeaMonkey 2.49.4 for browser and email
Yes. Multiple rev's behind. Doing housekeeping before updating ;}
MATE with installation defaults had run fine.
Lon
uires-Root: no
Standards-Version: 4.5.1
Section: metapackages
Priority: optional
Package: mrc-base
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends},
bc,
cron,
...
zip,
Package: mrc-mozilla
Architecture: all
Description: MRC's Mozilla apt configuration
Lots of files under /etc/apt.
Depends: ${mi
Mike Castle writes:
Hah!
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/08/msg00042.html
Yes, that was me > 10a ago. Transitioning from these scripts to ant allowed
came with a few improvements:
* I switched all package building to `debuild` in favor of using more
low-level tools for `raw` p
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 04:40:24PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> Like Alex, one of my physical machines is a laptop that is not always
> on the home network. Though I'm usually connected to *something*.
> I'm still debating whether to bother with a VPN or trying something
> like a tailnet.
For
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Mike Castle wrote:
Now, I would like to expand that into also setting up various config
files that I currently do manually, for example, the `/etc/apt/*`
configs I need to make the above work. For a single set of files,
manual isn't bad, but as I want to get into setting up
Hah!
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/08/msg00042.html
On 21/04/2024 08:40, Mike Castle wrote:
One thing Linux-Fan mentioned was `config-package-dev`. In my OP, I
commented about ``slightly old to really old tools'', and that was one
I was thinking of. It looks like it hasn't been touched in seven
years, and I wasn't sure if it still worked. But t
Thanks for all the suggestions so far.
Like Alex, one of my physical machines is a laptop that is not always
on the home network. Though I'm usually connected to *something*.
I'm still debating whether to bother with a VPN or trying something
like a tailnet.
Heck, before I adopted Debian and ran
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> Anyway, suggestions based upon actually experience would be appreciated.
As others have mentioned, Ansible can be a good choice for as little
as one machine as long as you don't object to installing Python and
a bunch of Python ap
Mike Castle writes:
For a while now, I've been using `equivs-build` for maintaining a
hierarchy of metapackages to control what is installed on my various
machines. Generally, I can do `apt install mrc-$(hostname -s)` and
I'm golden.
Now, I would like to expand that into also setting up variou
discovered that all
> > files under `/etc` are treated specially.
The limitation of this is that you cannot modify existing configuration
files, which is required sometimes.
> > Anyway, suggestions based upon actually experience would be appreciated.
>
> The easy end of single-machi
tps://cinc.sh is producing a fully open release
of Chef (with the new name, Cinc is not chef). I use Chef at
work.
The easy end of single-machine is etckeeper, which just checks
your /etc (and whatever else you specify) into a local git. The
high end of single machine is Nix, which has a complete lan
For a while now, I've been using `equivs-build` for maintaining a
hierarchy of metapackages to control what is installed on my various
machines. Generally, I can do `apt install mrc-$(hostname -s)` and
I'm golden.
Now, I would like to expand that into also setting up various config
files that I c
On 2024-04-07 04:48 +0300, Cyprus Socialite wrote:
> I am trying to configure Apt to follow a "stable where we can, unstable
> where we must" logic.
>
> On the "Stable+Backports - Testing - Unstable - Experimental" stencil, I
> would like to
>
> - install left-to-right (the stablest version availa
Hi all,
I am trying to configure Apt to follow a "stable where we can, unstable
where we must" logic.
On the "Stable+Backports - Testing - Unstable - Experimental" stencil, I
would like to
- install left-to-right (the stablest version available),
- upgrade right-to-left (the stablest newer ver
On 21/02/2024 21:08, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 21 Feb 2024 19:03 +, from an...@rodier.me (Andre Rodier):
- What is the best approach to check if there is any vulnerability in the
packages configuration ?
- Is there any service that could audit the deployment code or the
configuration files
On February 21, 2024, at 4:08 PM, Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net>
wrote:
>On 21 Feb 2024 19:03 +, from an...@rodier.me (Andre Rodier):
>> - What is the best approach to check if there is any vulnerability in the
>> packages configuration ?
>> - Is t
On 21 Feb 2024 19:03 +, from an...@rodier.me (Andre Rodier):
> - What is the best approach to check if there is any vulnerability in the
> packages configuration ?
> - Is there any service that could audit the deployment code or the
> configuration files ?
My understanding is tha
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 11:23 PM, John Hasler
wrote:
> Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming writes:
>
> > You managed to install OpenWRT on an Ubiquiti router?
>
>
> Yes. It was quite straightforward. Instructions on the OpenWRT site.
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@sugarbit.com
> Elmwood,
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 11:23 PM, John Hasler
wrote:
> Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming writes:
>
> > You managed to install OpenWRT on an Ubiquiti router?
>
>
> Yes. It was quite straightforward. Instructions on the OpenWRT site.
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@sugarbit.com
>
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming writes:
> You managed to install OpenWRT on an Ubiquiti router?
Yes. It was quite straightforward. Instructions on the OpenWRT site.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 6:15 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>
> > UDM Pro runs Debian 11 (bullseye)
>
>
> I have a Ubiquiti router. Before I installed OpenWRT I explored the OS.
> It uses packages from Bullseye but it is certainly not Debian.
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 6:08 AM, jeremy ardley
wrote:
> On 7/12/23 23:52, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>
> > Subject: Could not find interfaces configuration file
> > /etc/network/interfaces in Debian Linux 11 (bullseye)
>
>
>
&g
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 6:05 AM, Andy Smith
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:52:20PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
>
> > UDM Pro runs Debian 11 (bullseye)
>
>
> I don't think it does. Just because you found a file on the
> filesystem that sa
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 12:19 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Dec 07, 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:52:20PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> > wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Problem
> > > =
> > >
> > > On 6 Dec 2023, our client d
On Friday, December 8th, 2023 at 12:12 AM, to...@tuxteam.de
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:52:20PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Problem
> > =
> >
> > On 6 Dec 2023, our client discovered that their UDM Pro could not perform
> > firmwa
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> UDM Pro runs Debian 11 (bullseye)
I have a Ubiquiti router. Before I installed OpenWRT I explored the OS.
It uses packages from Bullseye but it is certainly not Debian. You
couldn't find that file because it isn't there.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
On 7/12/23 23:52, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Subject: Could not find interfaces configuration file /etc/network/interfaces
in Debian Linux 11 (bullseye)
You should confirm that the device is actually using that file.
There are at least three different network configuration
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:52:20PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> UDM Pro runs Debian 11 (bullseye)
I don't think it does. Just because you found a file on the
filesystem that says it does, is as trustworthy as the claims in
your email that your client is called Henry Kiss
On Dec 07, 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:52:20PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Problem
> > =
> >
> > On 6 Dec 2023, our client discovered that their UDM Pro could not perform
> > firmware updates automatically. Their UDM Pr
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:52:20PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
[...]
> Problem
> =
>
> On 6 Dec 2023, our client discovered that their UDM Pro could not perform
> firmware updates automatically. Their UDM Pro was running UniFi OS version
> 3.0.20. Client wants to upgr
Subject: Could not find interfaces configuration file /etc/network/interfaces
in Debian Linux 11 (bullseye)
Good day from Singapore,
Background Information
===
Initially our client has a UniFi Dream Machine Pro (UDM Pro) acting as a
firewall and router. Port 9 (WAN1) on
sl ciphers, running
protocols 1.2 and 1.3 only and want to ensure I've got the best
security setup.
Thanks.
Dave.
#
# example.com virtual host configuration
#
# enforce HTTPS
# Redirect www.example.com port 80 to www.example.com port 443
server {
listen 80;
server_name www.example.com;
On 5/31/23 14:42, john doe wrote:
On 5/31/23 11:36, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
For the sake of simplicity and troubleshooting, please modify
sources.list directly.
What does a
On 5/31/23 11:36, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
For the sake of simplicity and troubleshooting, please modify
sources.list directly.
What does acng.conf look like?
Note that thi
ch. Second, if you
are going to use hhtps, give the complete URL. Like so:
Acquire::https {Proxy "https://localhost:3142";};
But I don't think that's part of your problem.
For what it's worth, my configuration for ACN looks like:
root@chaffee:~# cat
Yes, after purging apt-cacher-ng the problem was gone. And after i
reinstalled apt-cacher-ng and configured it that way:
Acquire::http {Proxy "http://localhost:3142";};
Acquire::https {Proxy "http://";};
there are any errors too, although i don't know what caused them. But
thank you for your
On 5/30/23 19:39, Dennis Heddicke wrote:
Hello,
i have a problem with "apt update", everytime i execute the command, i
get the following error messages:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security
InRelease [48,0 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease [
Hello,
i have a problem with "apt update", everytime i execute the command, i
get the following error messages:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security
InRelease [48,0 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease [193 kB]
Err:1 http://security.debian.o
On Thu 02 Mar 2023 at 10:32:41 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> On 2023-03-02 00:24, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 28 Feb 2023 at 16:05:14 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> > > On 2023-02-28 05:27, David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Thu 23 Feb 2023 at 11:23:30 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamil
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 12:14:14PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 02 Mar 2023 at 17:23:23 (-), Curt wrote:
> > On 2023-03-02, David wrote:
[...]
> > Those seem like antithetical concepts.
>
> The state is identical in both cases, hence using the same letter.
> OTOH the paths to that st
e example of this
format.) The reference below is much better, as the figure is a table
(as well as being comprehensive).
> > Yeah. It does mean purged, or never installed.
> >
> >p - the package and all its configuration files were removed, or the
> >package was
man page that explains the symbols in the first 3 columns, as
>> far as I can find.
>
> Yeah. It does mean purged, or never installed.
>
>p - the package and all its configuration files were removed, or the
>package was never installed.
Those seem like antithetical conc
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 02:18, wrote:
> On 2023-03-02 14:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:01:57PM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> >> > > > akb@akira:~$ LC_ALL=C aptitude why ifupdown
> >> > > > p netscript-2.4 Provides ifupdown
> >> > > > p netscript-2.4 Depends b
On 2023-03-02 14:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:01:57PM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> > > akb@akira:~$ LC_ALL=C aptitude why ifupdown
> > > p netscript-2.4 Provides ifupdown
> > > p netscript-2.4 Depends bridge-utils (>= 0.9.3)
> > > p bridge-utils Suggests
mns, as
> far as I can find.
Yeah. It does mean purged, or never installed.
p - the package and all its configuration files were removed, or the
package was never installed.
>From here (Buster):
grep -A 16 'Figure.2\.9\.' /usr/share/aptitude/README
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:01:57PM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> > > > akb@akira:~$ LC_ALL=C aptitude why ifupdown
> > > > p netscript-2.4 Provides ifupdown
> > > > p netscript-2.4 Depends bridge-utils (>= 0.9.3)
> > > > p bridge-utils Suggests ifupdown
> > > > akb@akira:~$ LC_ALL
2.4
[...]
Description-en: Linux 2.4/2.6/3.x router/firewall/VM host network
config system.
This is a router and firewall network configuration system. It is
specific to
the 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernel series. This system is in production use,
even
though this is an experimental version.
[...]
DO
ter/firewall/VM host network
config system.
This is a router and firewall network configuration system. It is
specific to
the 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernel series. This system is in production use,
even
though this is an experimental version.
[...]
DON'T use this on a pure server - it is VERY usef
irewall/VM host network config system.
This is a router and firewall network configuration system. It is specific to
the 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernel series. This system is in production use, even
though this is an experimental version.
[...]
DON'T use this on a pure server - it is VERY useful
On 2023-03-02 00:24, David Wright wrote:
On Tue 28 Feb 2023 at 16:05:14 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
On 2023-02-28 05:27, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 23 Feb 2023 at 11:23:30 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> > On 2023-02-23 02:59, cono...@panix.com wrote:
[ … ]
Well, it look
he DHCP client would send it requests to
> 192.168.1.1 (my home's gateway) instead of using the VPN
> interface/route/whatever.
> dhclient must have some wrong conf, but I never changed the default
> conf, So I have no idea what part may be wrong or what's missing
I had thought that it might be possible to configure a package like
openresolv to manage the contention between the configurations, but
judging what I've learned about your networking setup, it's probably
easier just to hack it, using the method at the bottom of the wiki
page, simply making resolv.conf immutable when your vpn starts up,
and mutable when it stops, using Reco's suggestion. That should save
you bothering with how the rest of your configuration is set up.
And do remember to make the file mutable at boot time, in case your
computer should crash while it's immutable.
Cheers,
David.
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 16:05 +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
>
> It's the systemd-style so-called "predictable" interfaces names.
> Replacing the older the eth0, wlan0, and so on…
>
> ens-something (annoying name made of multiple letters and digits) is the
> new name for eth0
Or eno for eth
On 2023-02-28 05:27, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 23 Feb 2023 at 11:23:30 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
On 2023-02-23 02:59, cono...@panix.com wrote:
[…]
On the newer work laptop on the other hand, there is that eth0 block,
there's is no eth0 interface on my system (there's enp.* and en
using HTTP.
> >
> > Might look at:
> >
> > /etc/network/interfaces.d/setup
> >
> > as explained in "man interfaces". (That file can/might be changed via
> > the network symbol in the window manager's configuration bar/menu
> > syst
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 03:14:40PM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> I did
>
> - chattr +i /etc/revolv.conf
>
> And when auditd showed a (failed) delete event on /etc/resolv.conf
>
> I grepped "resolv.conf" recursively on /var/log/, and All I've found are
> entries in
>
> - /var/log/instal
Hello
On 2023-02-24 11:27, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
On 2023-02-24 10:27, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:19:38AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org
wrote:
[...]
BUT I will make sure to take some time to dig into the logs monday.
Now that I have an idea what I'm looking for
On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 10:19:38 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> > […]
> > vpnc_script has about eight methods available for setting up and
> > reverting resolv.conf. Which is used depends on the presence of
> > a binary, checked in turn from this list:
> >
> > /etc/openwrt_release
t;. It doesn't
involve installing any new packages.
If your testing is successful (e.g. a whole day goes by and the
resolv.conf file is not unexpectedly altered), then things get a little
bit trickier. If I understand correctly, you're working on a laptop,
and your desired configuration
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 11:27:40AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> [...] totally agree logs are better than suspicion
But please, don't take my snark all too seriously. On reread I
realize it might have sounded harsher than it was meant.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On 2023-02-24 10:27, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:19:38AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
[...]
However, I didn't notice any vnpc_script malfunction. It does what it
is
expected to do. I'm like 99% sure the problem is dhclient deleting and
recreating /etc/resolv.con
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:19:38AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
[...]
> However, I didn't notice any vnpc_script malfunction. It does what it is
> expected to do. I'm like 99% sure the problem is dhclient deleting and
> recreating /etc/resolv.conf as it sees fit, multiple times a day, and
Hello,
[…]
vpnc_script has about eight methods available for setting up and
reverting resolv.conf. Which is used depends on the presence of
a binary, checked in turn from this list:
/etc/openwrt_release modify_resolvconf_openwrt
/usr/bin/resolvectl modify_resolved_manager
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:39:03PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
[...]
> vpnc_script has about eight methods available for setting up and
> reverting resolv.conf. Which is used depends on the presence of
> a binary, checked in turn from this list:
>
> /etc/openwrt_release modify_resolvco
On Thu 23 Feb 2023 at 10:44:35 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> On 2023-02-22 22:08, David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 18:12:29 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> >
> > > What I want is: setting up /etc/resolv.conf ONLY
> > > - at system startup/initial network connexion
Hi.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:31:44AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> > If it is DHCP: You might do a countermeasure in
> > /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf. On my system I have an entry as below.
> >
> > interface "wlp4s0" {
> > supersede domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
>
> Unfortunately,
On 2023-02-23 10:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:44:35AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
[...]
Thank you. I'll give it a try, But I won't be on remote work before
next
week
Which log file is used for that?
That depends: it's the perpetrator's choice where to log
hich I work… and work's proxy as well, which when it
cannot
be resolved… breaks everything using HTTP.
Might look at:
/etc/network/interfaces.d/setup
as explained in "man interfaces". (That file can/might be changed via
the network symbol in the window manager's configu
Hi
On 2023-02-22 18:30, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote:
Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:12:29PM +0100 schrieb
daven...@tuxfamily.org:
= context =
For the context, I use a Debian 11 laptop for work. When I work
remotely
from home, I have to use a cisco VPN. Good thing is there is
openco
when it
cannot
be resolved… breaks everything using HTTP.
Might look at:
/etc/network/interfaces.d/setup
as explained in "man interfaces". (That file can/might be changed via
the network symbol in the window manager's configuration bar/menu
system, usually required wi
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:44:35AM +0100, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
[...]
> Thank you. I'll give it a try, But I won't be on remote work before next
> week
> Which log file is used for that?
That depends: it's the perpetrator's choice where to log (or whether
to log at all, sadly).
> So ins
Hello
On 2023-02-22 22:08, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 18:12:29 (+0100), daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
What I want is: setting up /etc/resolv.conf ONLY
- at system startup/initial network connexion.
- when openconnect is executed and connects to work's VPN
- when openconnect is
resolved⦠breaks everything using HTTP.
Might look at:
/etc/network/interfaces.d/setup
as explained in "man interfaces". (That file can/might be changed via
the network symbol in the window manager's configuration bar/menu
system, usually required with root/sudo privileges.)
John
--
John Conover, cono...@panix.com, http://www.johncon.com/
On 2/22/23, daven...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
>
> There is an unidentified process that decides it's ok to delete and
> recreate /etc/resolv.conf without asking user/admin,
> The problem is, the problematic process is not work's VPN related and
> creates the file with wrong resolver's IP. The IP corre
1 - 100 of 4707 matches
Mail list logo
