On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 02:11:53AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 3/2/25 01:40, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 04:42:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > flathub.flatpakrepo
> > Nowhere.
>
> And this is to indicate that flatpaks will not be accepted by debian?
XY-problem co
On 3/2/25 01:40, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 04:42:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
flathub.flatpakrepo
Nowhere.
And this is to indicate that flatpaks will not be accepted by debian?
Installing that is one of the steps listed as a prerequisite to
installing the flatpak ve
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 04:42:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> flathub.flatpakrepo
Nowhere.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 3/1/25 17:06, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 16:49:05 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On 3/1/25 16:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 15:43:39 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Chromium has hijacked port 80 for google's exclusive use, bypassing totally
my /etc/hosts file f
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025, 9:12 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> You might want to add a bullet point addressing folks adding "SOLVED"
> and similar to titles. Either allow it or forbid it. But write it down
> so everyone knows what the policy is.
>
> I recommend the list forbid it. A mailing list is not a f
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 22:38 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> If it's a DKMS, which is what my nvidia driver is, then it will try
> to
> be built for any kernel install and should work as long as you have
> headers installed. Though there have been times that things have
> changed
> and its build is broke
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:18:36AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> [SOLVED] "Can't configure network on Debian - please advise"
>
> would make it a lot easier to find answers on some of the longer
> threads concerning problems. As ever, opinions may vary and i'd like
> to know what others f
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:18:36AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> There is something to be said for it if you have a long thread
> where the topic or subject is initially imprecise - a hypothetical
> example follows:
>
> "Can't configure network on Debian - please advise" might attract
> twe
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> You might want to add a bullet point addressing folks adding "SOLVED"
> and similar to titles. Either allow it or forbid it. But write it down
> so everyone knows what the policy is.
>
Hi Jeff,
I thought I had addressed it by sugg
You might want to add a bullet point addressing folks adding "SOLVED"
and similar to titles. Either allow it or forbid it. But write it down
so everyone knows what the policy is.
I recommend the list forbid it. A mailing list is not a forum, like BB.
Jeff
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 4:07 PM Andrew M.
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 02:24:04PM -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> The NVidia kernel module is built by running a bash script. It's not a
> .deb package.
>
> Will it still be automatigically rebuilt?
If it's a DKMS, which is what my nvidia driver is, then it will try to
be built for any kernel in
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 21:02 +0100, Hans wrote:
> With an upgrade the build of the nvidia-kernel-module should run
> automatically.
The NVidia kernel module is built by running a bash script. It's not a
.deb package.
Will it still be automatigically rebuilt?
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 16:49:05 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 3/1/25 16:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 15:43:39 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > Chromium has hijacked port 80 for google's exclusive use, bypassing
> > > totally
> > > my /etc/hosts file for my local network.
On 3/1/25 16:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 15:43:39 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Chromium has hijacked port 80 for google's exclusive use, bypassing totally
my /etc/hosts file for my local network.
You keep saying this, but nobody else is having this issue.
The closest approxi
flathub.flatpakrepo
Tnx.
Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
- Louis D. Brandeis
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 15:43:39 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Chromium has hijacked port 80 for google's exclusive use, bypassing totally
> my /etc/hosts file for my local network.
You keep saying this, but nobody else is having this issue.
The closest approximation to your experience that anyone
On 3/1/25 09:33, Greg wrote:
On 2025-03-01, gene heskett wrote:
On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
It's worth reading this too.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not
change it to where it only n
Thank you for your prompt response.
Regarding your concern about our credibility, I can assure you that we
are all beginners or advance programmers here, but not experts
programmers by a long shut. We don't have a web page 'cos we don't have
the resources to do so. However, our developers, who
On Sat, 01 Mar 2025 11:27:25 -0800
Van Snyder wrote:
>
> If I get the metapackages linux-image-amd64 and limux-headers-amd64,
> will I need to rebuild the NVidia driver every time it loads a new
> kernel?
Probably yes. If you install a fixed kernel version, you'll probably
need only the headers
Am Samstag, 1. März 2025, 20:27:25 CET schrieb Van Snyder:
> On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 22:00 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > That's correct. You're probably missing the metapackage that brings
> > in new kernels automatically. For an amd64 machine, that metapackage
> > is named "linux-image-amd64". (If
On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 22:00 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
>
> That's correct. You're probably missing the metapackage that brings
> in new kernels automatically. For an amd64 machine, that metapackage
> is named "linux-image-amd64". (If you use DKMS kernel modules,
> you'll
> also want the correspon
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 04:06 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 4:04 AM Joe wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:27:40 -0800
> > Van Snyder wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 22:35 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> > > > Your kernel is older than your CPU by about a yea
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 10:42 -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:16:18AM -0500, Arbol One wrote:
> > > Hello to all.
> > >
> > > I find myself looking for a way to increase productivity with the
> > > aid of an
> > > all purpose no-code web builder application for Linu
* On 2025 01 Mar 08:33 -0600, Greg wrote:
> On 2025-03-01, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
> >> It's worth reading this too.
> >>
> >> https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
> >
> > Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, doe
Debian-user is a mailing list provided for support for Debian users,
and to facilitate discussion on relevant topics.
Codes of Conduct
* The list is a Debian communication forum. As such, it is subject to both
the Debian mailing list Code of Conduct and the main Debian Code of
Hello,
I have a laptop with integrated Intel i915 and nouveau, where the
external monitor is connected via HDMI.
Setup works and I have arranged the screens side-by-side. Xorg is using
modesetting driver (no xorg.conf).
I want to try GPU offloading and installed bumblebee and primus package
On 3/1/25 09:20, Richmond wrote:
gene heskett writes:
On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
It's worth reading this too.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not
change it to where it only needs lots
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:16:18AM -0500, Arbol One wrote:
> > Hello to all.
> >
> > I find myself looking for a way to increase productivity with the aid of
> an
> > all purpose no-code web builder application for Linux. What I am looking
> for
> > is something that is more suited for a small to
{
"emoji": "🌷",
"version": 1
}
Op za 1 mrt 2025 om 15:33 schreef Greg :
> What about Chromium? Or let's write one ourselves!!!
> I guess that would be easier said than done.
Who else wants to take packages.debian.org/qutebrowser and morph it into a
qutebrowser.hs or better following the lead of packages.debian.org/xmonad?
On 2025-02-28, Arbol One wrote:
> an all purpose no-code web builder application for Linux. What I am
What is a web builder appplication and what does it do?
On 2025-03-01, gene heskett wrote:
> On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
>> It's worth reading this too.
>>
>> https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
>
> Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not
> change it to where it only needs lots of salt.
eye agree wid u AJ dat dis is a secrecy nitemare and relinquishes all
proprietary ownership of information but eye welcum it as utterly funny
since information wants to be free praise be to stallman.org and allA
Excerpt from ToS:
> > You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, inclu
gene heskett writes:
> On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
>> It's worth reading this too.
>>
>> https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
>
> Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not
> change it to where it only needs lots of salt.
>
> The thing
On 3/1/25 7:53 AM, gene heskett wrote:
On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
It's worth reading this too.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not
change it to where it only needs lots of salt.
The th
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 04:06:37 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 4:04 AM Joe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:27:40 -0800
> > Van Snyder wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 22:35 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> > > > Your kernel is older than your CPU by about a ye
On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote:
It's worth reading this too.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not
change it to where it only needs lots of salt.
The thing that irks me is that they have repla
It's worth reading this too.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
On 2/28/25 11:58 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:16:18AM -0500, Arbol One wrote:
Hello to all.
I find myself looking for a way to increase productivity with the aid of an
all purpose no-code web builder application for Linux. What I am looking for
is something that is mor
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 00:27:44 -0500
"Paul M. Foster" wrote:
>
> [...] I'm hoping
> for a fork (Zen?), but Brave is looking more promising.
Could GNU IceCat[1] be an option to have as .deb package?
> As for Debian, I hope they take no position on this. It really isn't
> something for Debian to c
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 4:04 AM Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:27:40 -0800
> Van Snyder wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 22:35 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> > > Your kernel is older than your CPU by about a year, so likely
> > > doesn't have enough
> > > backporting to fully support it prope
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:27:40 -0800
Van Snyder wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 22:35 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Your kernel is older than your CPU by about a year, so likely
> > doesn't have enough
> > backporting to fully support it properly. A newer kernel could be
> > all it takes to
> > make
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:00:41 -0800
Van Snyder wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 12:46 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 14:34 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:27:40 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > > > "apt update" says everything is up to date, but the k
Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2025, 21:46:35 CET schrieb Van Snyder:
> On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 14:34 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:27:40 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> > > "apt update" says everything is up to date, but the kernel is
> > > 6.1.0-18.
> > > I believe there are severa
On 2/28/25 5:58 PM, ajz3...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this real? Firefox just introduced the "Terms of Use" document, that
includes some really disturbing entries.
The Worst Firefox Update Ever
https://youtu.be/E4JOnQY_qbo
Info from Mozilla:
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/f
On 1/3/25 13:58, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:16:18AM -0500, Arbol One wrote:
Hello to all.
I find myself looking for a way to increase productivity with the aid of an
all purpose no-code web builder application for Linux. What I am looking for
is something that is more
46 matches
Mail list logo
