* On 2025 01 Mar 08:33 -0600, Greg wrote: > On 2025-03-01, gene heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > > On 3/1/25 07:20, Richmond wrote: > >> It's worth reading this too. > >> > >> https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/ > > > > Which, while rewriting it to use more palatable language, does not > > change it to where it only needs lots of salt. > > What about Chromium? Or let's write one ourselves!!!
Or just patch out the objectionable parts as long as that is possible. Unfortunately, whatever Mozilla wants to add in the effort of monetizing Firefox will likely be so entwined in the source that it will be next to impossible to patch out, easily, if at all. > I guess that would be easier said than done. Herding cats? I suspect that this is being discussed by the various distributions and what this might mean. Is a fork and collaborative browser project based on Gecko in our future? Is a greater effort on Webkit based browsers such as Epihpany a desired path? Is this all to do of nothing (I don't think so but some might)? - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Web: https://www.n0nb.us Projects: https://github.com/N0NB GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
