Florian Weimer wrote:
> Would debian-admin or the security team like to act as a contact for
> such problems (i.e. potential compromise of Debian infrastructure)?
> Perhaps http://www.debian.org/security/ could be updated accordingly?
Anything but a non-public list/forum/whatever would be fine and
> >
> > yes. Please take it.
>
> okay, when i return from VAC in three days i'll start packaging the new
> upstream release for it, and take over the package with a new upload.
What's the status of this?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
ystrace frontend invoked by systrace
It sems nobody is interested in those. Should we reassign the WNPP
bugs to ftp.debian.org to ask for removal?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would simply closing the wnpp bug
> be enough?
Just close the WNPP bug with the new upload. I just wanted to make
sure this hasn't been forgotten about.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-16 11:26]:
> > | - time (dead upstream)
> >
> > I'd like time, please.
>
> All yours.
Are you going to make an upload soon?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Or maybe not.
Did you keep track which packages have been spoken for and for which
you still need to file RFA or O reports?
It seems at least tob is still outstanding. Gunnar Wolf seemed
interested in some of the Perl packages but it's not quite clear to me
which he'll actually adop
sr/ is not
yet available) are reasonable, so I'm not opposed to doing this.
Is there any opposing opinion? Should this be done now / post Sarge /
never?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian G
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: libpam-smb
Version : 1.9.9+2.0.0-rc6
Upstream Author : Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.csn.ul.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/
License : GPL
nf (1.4.44) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix a rogue quotation mark intorduced in the translatable string patch
in the previous version. Closes: #293666 (and approximatly 2e5 other bugs
that will be filed before dinstall tomorrow).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To U
00217.html and in
particular http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg00261.html
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
> Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
> Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
> being probably a virus scanning software and such similar sof
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
> > http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
> >
> > > PS: If you are in rush, I or javi sh
me. Debian doin't have spice3 (and
> I'm still looking for that, since ngspice and spicep08s have compile
> environment glitches - the annoying kind).
It's better to put separate issues into their own bug reports, but I'm
CCing the maintainers of these packages so they can c
Moin,
We need help by competent developers who work on apt 0.6 with the goal
to get it supported properly and eventually enter sid and sarge.
There is a good chance the release will happen before the issues with
apt 0.6 are resolved, so this may be a task that cannot address sarge
in time but onl
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.14.1851 +0100]:
> > We need help by competent developers who work on apt 0.6 with the goal
> > to get it supported properly and eventually enter sid and sarge.
>
> Thank you, Joey!
&g
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> > You still need to deal with key revocation and a new key being needed,
> > anyway. Yearly changes will not make it more difficult, it will make sure
> > those codepaths are tested (and used at least once an year).
> I can understand that
Marek Habersack wrote:
> It's just a simple question/request. Would it be possible to include
> custom headers in the messages sent to debian-devel-changes that would
> contain the package name, version and distribution, like so:
>
> X-Debian-Package: foo
> X-Debian-PackageVersion: 1.2.3-1
>
[Why to cc on policy? Cut]
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
> >perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should*
> >care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic
> >under
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 06:44:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a debian developer, so i could not po
Sean,
sounds really good. How do your scripts relate to the db management
scripts provided by wwwconfig-common, maintained by Ola Lundqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
I suspect your package should be either supercede wwwconfig-common or
be rolled into it.
cheers,
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
the question is: Should usbmount be included in Debian?
Thanks,
Martin
PS: Rafael has asked that all mails regarding this topic are CC'ed to
him, please. M-F-T header set accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:28:39 -0500, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my code is a superset of what's done in wwwconfig-common.
That sounds great! thanks for your work on this front. I'll be reading
your doco in more detail, as I have to sort out the path forward
etely) implement "sync". Just try it:
copy a big file onto a VFAT stick mounted with "sync" and immediately
remove it. The file will be truncated. Also, if you immediately
execute "sync" after copying something, a big bunch of data will still
be wri
upgrade
apt-get install x-window-system-core kdebase mozilla-firefox openoffice.org
apt-get install cupsys-bsd cupsys-driver-gimpprint gs-esp
and installed a home-compiled 2.6.11 kernel.
I do not have xprt, xprt-common or xprt-xprintorg installed and can print
fine from both Firefox and OOo.
--
I'll follow up with more
information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-listchanges is only invoked when you use apt-get to install the
package. Maybe you were using dpkg to test the upgrade? (At least
that's what I did once...).
Also, NEWS.Debian has to be in the right format. What does yours look
like?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To U
*, not installs.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LilyPond packages, and a potential
> new maintainer (Pedro Kroger) with his sponsor going mia.
Who was going to sponsor him?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Due to lack of time and since I stopped using it quite a while ago I
intendo to orphan oftc-hybrid. The package is outdated, current upstream
version is oftc-hybrid-1.4.0pre4.
Since nor weasel nor I use bubblefishymon we intend to orphan this one
as well. There is no more upstream work in pro
pplications
...
> If no one wants them, I'll ask for their removal.
It has been over a month and nobody has indicated interest. Since
these packages have never been part of a stable release, I think
removing them would make sense. Is it okay with you to go ahead with
this?
--
Martin
userspace logging daemon
These packages have not been adopted yet. Can you please file proper
WNPP bugs for them (see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 10:56]:
> Would it be possible to have a list of such proposed architectures?
amd64, s390z, powerpc64, netbsd-i386 and other variants, sh3/sh4, m32r
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
ateways, and you don't really want to run unstable in such
environments. testing+security updates might be a compromise, but
unstable is clearly not an option for a S390 box or a mipsel Cobalt
gateway.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
supposed to happen.
Can one of you take what I said just, put this in some more coherent
form and post it to -devel?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d. So please consider this an invitation to adopt
lilypond if you're serious about maintaining it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
herefore it would make more sense
to call the 64 bit port powerpc64.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Remove one architecture, and you remove an entire userbase. Remove 10% of
> our least used packages and I bet you wont lose but a handful of users.
>
> --
> Debian - http://www.debian.org/
> Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
> Subversion - http://subversio
port for those architectures).
This is a problem for every new architecture, but not existing
architectures are facing the same problem.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the long run I think it would be easier to apply for vendor-sec
subscription. Joey is already subscribed, but since he does not deal
with unstable updates, it would be good to have Andres on board.
Personally I would apreciate and support Andres' subscription to
vendor-sec.
Martin
--
Mart
Steve Langasek wrote:
> First, the news for sarge. As mentioned in the last release team
> update[1], deploying the testing-security queues has been held up
> pending some infrastructure enhancements, without which
> ftp-master.debian.org cannot handle the load of the added wanna-build
> queues fo
le (just one randomly grabbed from the archives). See
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/ for more information,
especially http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/README
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-locale-zh-cn also needs
attention as do other -zh packages.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ication of what I said given Thomas'
response but please don't waste time reading it.]
> Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One problem, as you say above, is that random people building packages
> > are more likely to break
Martin Schulze wrote:
> > not to mention the time spent by the DSA/buildd admins and the security
>
> Thanks for asking the security team how much work it is to support 11
> architectures. Err... Huh? I wasn't asked? Uh?
>
> However, to clarify this for the read
el--1
postgresql-transition--devel--1
If you want to work on them, either just check them out and send me
patches, or do it the arch way and branch off to your own repository
and tell me where to merge from.
Happy testing and databasing!
Martin
P.S. This is _not_ Sarge stuff. The detaille
I can't test it myself, but was thinking of running XFS in future.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
pgpenipfzRHE0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a 'loginfo' file configuration that works
> for alioth.
> I thought I have found a solution few days ago, but when
> I came back, it no longer seems to work correctly:
>
>
> CVSROOT/loginfo contains:
> DEFAULT /usr/bin/cvs-mailcommit --mailto [EM
sen during installation. Once Bob User has
> turned into Bob Hacker he can switch back to the detailed form.
So having a menu-simple that only displays the default foo-application
as defined via the debian alternative system with the option to switch
to the (current) menu system might be a
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Zejn Gasper wrote:
> I've had the same experience yesterday, i didn't have time, so i downgraded
> to
> 2.6.12.
>
> But there's something wrong with the kernel.
Others wrote:
> >
> > Waiting 2 seconds /sys/block/hda/dev to show up.
> >
> > /bin/cat:/sy
s mean that archs not listed (such as alpha, i386, and powerpc) are
> already qualified?
"Given release architectures have de-facto requalified" suggests so.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : qtodo
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tobias [EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://qtodo.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Description : Todo List Manager
QTodo is a todo-list manager. It is desig
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:19:42 -0500, Frans Jessop
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
>>Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if
>>all DD's worked through it on their projects?
>
>
> Sure, as long as they change lauchpad to meet my workf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: idjc
Version : 0.5.7
Upstream Author : Stephen Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.onlymeok.nildram.co.uk
* License : GPL
Description
Apparently - theres a major problem with immodule in Qt at the moment - which
causes
KeyReleasedEvent ro return a value of 0 for any QKeyEvent ... which is bad -
and means that anything
that relies on it will have problems processing the keypresses.
I found this out after my app in ubuntu had pr
Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole - thing, so
apologies if it shows up
in some weird place in threaded view.
Basically the way I see it isnt the fact that ubuntu isn't giving back to
debian - or debian isn't
willing to have the stuff from ubuntu. The way i see it is
hat I first thought it
was)
2) I am not lumping all Ubuntu Devs into one boat - nor all Debian Devs - I'm
jsut saying that I
think it's the few people out of the large who arent willing to cooperate for
whatever reason that
are causing this tension.
Martin Meredith wrote:
> Ok - I&#
es from unstable if this
makes sense.
I've regularly removed orphaned packages from unstable in the past but
I've been a bit busy with other work recently. If you, Thomas or
Christoph (or someone else), could help a hand, it would certainly be
appreciated.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://
Please read my first couple of lines in the email - as quoted below
>>Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole -
>>thing, so apologies if it shows up in some weird place in threaded
>>view.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> OK. Since you selected my post to reply to -- are
Ben Finney wrote:
> On 13-Jan-2006, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
>> --- Eddy Petriºor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>
>>>Can ome packaging can be done for non-free games?
>>
>>To be honest, I'm not particulary interested in non-free software at
>>all, including games, but I have nothing against it if w
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label
> which is the Debian maintainer and which is the Ubuntu maintainer.
Thing is, in ubuntu - we don't neccesarily have "maintainers" for packages.
We use a collaborative process - anyone who had access can modif
sed. But you know the rules.
regards,
martin
than nothing at all, no?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
atter, but cannot impose
that view on the general shape of the vote.
If the Secretary views the amendment as insufficiently clear as to what it
is attempting to establish, then he or she can always request
clarification.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
pgph1yVPpXsNM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:54, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 18:05 -0500, Christopher Martin a écrit :
> > Rather, it simply promulgates the interpretation that the GFDL, minus
> > invariant sections, while not perfect, is still DFSG-free.
>
>
ate, but I'd rather
> not see us piss off the python community for making a similar mistake.
I definitely agree we should listen to the Python community,
especially with the lovely Martin v. Löwis doing so much good work for
us.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thursday 19 January 2006 20:39, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Christopher Martin wrote:
> > No, because as I wrote the whole point of the amendment is to make
> > officially acceptable the interpretation of the license which views
> > the license as flawed
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:14:19AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> If you won't acknowledge that, then know that upstream also object to the
> name "python-base" for something which has a stripped-down standard library.
Both pythol-minimal and python-base sound to something an end user would
expect
However, if you were to request it - either through a member of core-dev -
or through the person who last updated the package, then as long as
yourdebian package worked exactly as it is intended to in ubuntu - I'm sure
they'd not have a problem with syncing and using your package from debian.
The
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > I looked at the homepage, and while this does appear useful, is it really
> > nescessary to be packaged all by itself?
> >
> > Think about a collection package; I don't think debian should be overloaded
> > with tons of single-program packages.
>
> I'm getting used to packag
what
features you backported.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_legitimate_ fashion. And I take
umbrage at your insinuations.
If an issue is highly controversial, then I can think of no better way of
settling it in a way that most developers will accept than a vote. People
respect votes much more than decrees, even if they don't agree with them.
Christopher Martin
pgpd94iDbUiVN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 09 February 2006 15:26, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm getting sick and tired of hearing this over and over again. The
> > last two votes were not about the GFDL.
>
> Why did we take the second vot
On Thursday 09 February 2006 15:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If the developers are (as a whole) too untrustworthy to be able to vote
> > on such matters without 3:1 training wheels attached by their elders,
> >
On Thursday 09 February 2006 16:41, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What I do see are a handful of single-minded individuals (only a small
> > subset of those who wish to have the GFDL removed, I stress) who seem
> >
an
software must meet. They may also include position statements about issues
of the day." The GFDL sounds like an "issue of the day" to me.
Christopher Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:28, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But what you are saying is that the developers don't have that
> > right.
>
> Quite wrong. I'm saying they *do* have this right, and it is a ri
doing these things.
>
> And we're following those procedures.
>
> So where's the problem?
The problem is that in the course of this procedure, the Secretary
overstepped his authority, as I've explained above. You may not agree with
that view, but I don't see why you should be so confused about my
complaint.
Christopher Martin
pgpfcjJGjfqhb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 09 February 2006 20:18, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:28, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > But what you ar
On Thursday 09 February 2006 21:27, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To impose the 3:1 requirement requires, beforehand, a judgment
> > concerning the DFSG. Since no one has found a Secretarial basis for
> > that power, it
roposal.
>
> How can he say "because this does not change the DFSG, it requires a
> majority" without making a judgment that it does not change the DFSG?
A simple majority is the default, and so allowing the default margin is
hardly a bold judgment. It's a refusal to make an extraordinary judgment,
namely, that a supermajority is required.
Christopher Martin
pgpUsq9IJZfuN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 09 February 2006 20:26, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why does the Secretary get to decide whether this barrier should be
> > set or not?
>
> The constitution says:
>
> "... the final de
We could use some advice and help with the GnuTLS / libasn1 update
that would fix the vulnerabilities reported recently.
The fix for libasn1 adds arguments to exported function. However,
these functions are named _asn_* and should not be used outside of
this library.
Unfortunately GnuTLS is doin
also be obtained from packages.debian.org
(currently use pdo.debian.net).
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lots of syncing going on recently.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-27 14:21]:
> ndiswraper is to allow users to write drivers, which they may or may
> not have written themselves and which may or may not be free software.
Wrong, its purpose ist to let them run these drivers.
yours Martin
--
<[
ting what the rationale is behind this migration.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ay.
Thanks, that list was exactly what I was looking for!
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Henrique!
The debian/changelog file is a file to document changes in the
respective package and not an arbitrary file to collect letters to
the stable release manager or anybody else. The latter should be
reached via mail.
Also, talking to the release manager before uploading a package,
best
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> > donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hos
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
> > changelogs and the copyright file at the bottom of each packages page
> > don't work. probbaly just something really minor...
>
> Didn't such things us
Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > The services in the backup are:
>
> Are there any plans to add svn.debian.org / alioth to this set?
No.
Alioth will have its own backup facility.
> (/me is glad he's still backing up his svn repos on his own..)
Good.
od, Debian-related use for it. Do you know of any
> need for such cases?
>
> Please let me know in the short term (let's say, two weeks), especially
> if *not* interested, because I would then get rid of them in another
> way.
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin M
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-09 18:46]:
> Build-Depends: [...] libselinux1-dev [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
> mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc linux-any]
Yes, that's the way to go for now. But please add "armeb" too.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http
the archive. I'll report my
findings in detail when I'm done.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
st=unstable
Status
* 76 Outstanding
* 1 Forwarded
* 1 Fixed in NMU
* 2 Resolved
* 3 From other Branch
Classification
* 55 Patch Available
* 21 Unclassified
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inux so I think i386-uclibc is fine. There
could be kfreebsd-i386-uclibc in the future, I suppose, or something
like that.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d not process
NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something like that more.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Küster wrote:
> Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
>
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
> >> month-old announcement. What abo
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
> Although that doesn't explain the packages listed up top.
DWN permanently lists new packages, have this always been false positives?
Regards,
Joey
--
The only stupid question is th
Nico Golde wrote:
> > > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
> > > one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
> > > I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I suspect NEW
> >
> > Well, that person is currently on the CeBIT and mann
101 - 200 of 2774 matches
Mail list logo
