On Thursday 09 February 2006 15:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If the developers are (as a whole) too untrustworthy to be able to vote > > on such matters without 3:1 training wheels attached by their elders, > > then who should be trusted? > > So is it your view then that the 3:1 requirement is pointless?
No, because the developers might want at some point to modify/override a foundation document, while acknowledging that they are doing so (i.e. they do not view it as an issue of interpretation, but expediency, or a need to adapt to changing circumstances, etc.). That would certainly require 3:1. Christopher Martin
pgpoVkB9gscj1.pgp
Description: PGP signature