Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011, 20:17:13 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow: > Lars Wirzenius writes: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:41:07AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> The suggestion that "git clean" be a solution appears to have caused > >> some level of outrage. However, at least for '3.0 (git)',

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Lars Wirzenius writes: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:41:07AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: >> The suggestion that "git clean" be a solution appears to have caused >> some level of outrage. However, at least for '3.0 (git)', all the >> sources are known to git, and 'git clean' is a reliable and simple

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/12/11 at 11:16 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >>>On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again > failing to build twice in a row, because of uncommitted > upstream changes. > > Yes, I'd expect that the situation is mu

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:41:07AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > The suggestion that "git clean" be a solution appears to have caused > some level of outrage. However, at least for '3.0 (git)', all the > sources are known to git, and 'git clean' is a reliable and simple > solution to the problem. T

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Steve Cotton
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:41:07AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > The suggestion that "git clean" be a solution appears to have caused > some level of outrage. However, at least for '3.0 (git)', all the > sources are known to git, and 'git clean' is a reliable and simple > solution to the problem. A

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:16:34AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >>>On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again > failing to build twice in a row, because of uncommitted > upstream changes. > > Yes, I'd expect that the s

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Jakub Wilk
On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Yes, I'd expect that the situation is much worse than it used to be. Not only because of dpkg-source changes

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-23 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Charles Plessy , 2011-12-21, 10:30: Personally I have given up making packages buildable twice in a row using “debian clean” for the packages I maintain with git, Thanks for the heads-up. I will avoid your packages when doing QA work. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Charles Plessy writes: > Le Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : >> With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to >> build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing >> this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be on

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Lucas Nussbaum writes: > On 20/12/11 at 23:16 +, brian m. carlson wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> > On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> > > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to >> > > build twice

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-21 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 20.12.2011, 21:36 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to > > build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing > > this was a lenny relea

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/12/11 at 23:16 +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to > > > build twice in a row, because of uncommitte

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to > build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing > this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be one again?!? Most > importantly,

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-20 Thread brian m. carlson
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to > > build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing > > this was a lenny release goa

Re: many packages fail to build twice in a row again

2011-12-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to > build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing > this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be one again?!? Most > importantly, maybe someone wh