Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes: > Le Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : >> With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to >> build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing >> this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be one again?!? Most >> importantly, maybe someone who has access to one of those build grids >> can run the old tests again, because I feel by accidentally stumbling >> upon these problems we will not be able to find and fix many of them any >> time soon. > > Personally I have given up making packages buildable twice in a row using > âdebian cleanâ for the packages I maintain with git, as it is really easy > to > reset the repository with âgit cleanâ and âgit checkoutâ. > > Half of the source packages that declare a VCS are managed with Git. I think > that instead of making complex workarounds, we would benefit of allowing the > 3.0 (git) source format, where âgit cleanâ and âgit checkoutâ could > be ran from > the clean target of debian/rules, if there is agreement that it does not > violate the principle of least surprise, as it also wipes out changes made in > the debian directory. > > About acceptability of that format for our archive, I have not seen direct > evidence that it is unsuitable, see http://bugs.debian.org/642801. > > Have a nice day,
That totaly violates the principle of least surprise. debian/rules clean should never undo changes made by the user. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87liq6uinc.fsf@frosties.localnet