On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:41:07AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > The suggestion that "git clean" be a solution appears to have caused > some level of outrage. However, at least for '3.0 (git)', all the > sources are known to git, and 'git clean' is a reliable and simple > solution to the problem.
Apparently "git clean" isn't enough: On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:30:53 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote: > “git clean” and “git checkout” could be ran from > the clean target of debian/rules I've spent time trying to debug a package that mysteriously reverted my changes before. It's definitely not compatible with the principle of least surprise. Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111223114124.ga21...@s.cotton.clara.co.uk
