On 05/03/2025 02:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 01:32 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
On 04/03/2025 21:43, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:15:16 +0800, Blair Noctis
wrote:
[...]
Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work.
Devref says it's "a simple emai
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025, Blair Noctis wrote:
> > From your initial list, my preferred outcome is to modify
> > tracker.debian.org so that all Uploaders are automatically subscribed,
> > that's what has been requested for a long time in
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756954
Hi Raphael,
On 10/03/2025 10:36, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
(tracker.debian.org maintainer here)
Thanks for maintaining the service ;)
Hi,
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025, Blair Noctis wrote:
So if the "staff" agrees,
we can make @p.d.o addresses forward also to Uploaders,
thus with @p.d.o address as Main
(tracker.debian.org maintainer here)
Hi,
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025, Blair Noctis wrote:
> So if the "staff" agrees,
> we can make @p.d.o addresses forward also to Uploaders,
> thus with @p.d.o address as Maintainer,
> also forwarding bug reports to Uploaders,
> achieving the goal.
I don't really agree
On Mon, 03 Mar 2025, Blair Noctis wrote:n
> Dan Armstrong (don) wontfix'd it after stating that, quote:
> > If the maintainer is not given as a mailing list, then the uploaders
> > should all subscribe to the PTS for a given package.
>
> and
>
> > The problem is that if I start sending mails to U
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 12:07 PM Blair Noctis wrote:
> (I'm also confused by the fact that follow-ups to bug reports aren't
> forwarded to submitters by default, but the submitter must X-Debbugs-Cc
> themselves, but then which is basically the default behavior of reportbug(1)
> now IIRC, but tha
On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 01:32 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
> On 04/03/2025 21:43, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:15:16 +0800, Blair Noctis
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work.
> > > Devref says it's "a simple email alias" that "provides
On 04/03/2025 21:43, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:15:16 +0800, Blair Noctis
wrote:
On 03/03/2025 01:40, Marc Haber wrote:
Maintainer: Debian Adduser Developers
Maintainer: Debian Sudo Maintainers
Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work.
Devref says it's "a
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2025-03-04 Blair Noctis wrote:
On 04/03/2025 01:29, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> There is another downside to the BTS sending mails to uploaders. - There
> is no simple unsubscribe, it would need a sourceful upload.
I wo
Quoting Andreas Metzler (2025-03-04 17:44:33)
> On 2025-03-04 Blair Noctis wrote:
> > On 04/03/2025 01:29, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > There is another downside to the BTS sending mails to uploaders. - There
> > > is no simple unsubscribe, it would need a sourceful upload.
>
> > I wonder
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Consider somebody being an active momeber of a larger team and leaving
it. He would continue to receive the mails sent uploaders. And the only
way to "unsubsribe" would be to make a (possibly huge) number of
sourceful uploads.
I t
On 2025-03-04 Blair Noctis wrote:
> On 04/03/2025 01:29, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > There is another downside to the BTS sending mails to uploaders. - There
> > is no simple unsubscribe, it would need a sourceful upload.
> I wonder who would bother to add themself to Uploaders of a package,
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:33:47 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin
wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:13:50PM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
>>>There is another downside to the BTS sending mails to uploaders. - There
>>>is no simple unsubscribe, it would need a sourceful upload.
>>
>>I wonder who would bother to
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:15:16 +0800, Blair Noctis
wrote:
>On 03/03/2025 01:40, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Maintainer: Debian Adduser Developers
>> Maintainer: Debian Sudo Maintainers
>
>Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work.
>Devref says it's "a simple email alias" that "provides
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:13:50PM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
There is another downside to the BTS sending mails to uploaders. - There
is no simple unsubscribe, it would need a sourceful upload.
I wonder who would bother to add themself to Uploaders of a package,
but then refuse to read bugs re
On 03/03/2025 01:40, Marc Haber wrote:
(...)
Maintainer: Debian Adduser Developers
Maintainer: Debian Sudo Maintainers
Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work.
Devref says it's "a simple email alias" that "provides a way to email the
maintainer",
"whatever their individ
On 04/03/2025 01:29, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2025-03-02 Blair Noctis wrote:
[...]
2. Let PTS automatically subscribe maintainers to packages they are Uploaders of
In the current version of the PTS, subscribing to a package means either a. after logging
in, clicking the Subscribe button on
On 2025-03-02 Blair Noctis wrote:
[...]
> 2. Let PTS automatically subscribe maintainers to packages they are Uploaders
> of
> In the current version of the PTS, subscribing to a package means either a.
> after logging in, clicking the Subscribe button on
> tracker.debian.org/pkg/foo, and opti
On 03/03/2025 03:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Blair Noctis (2025-03-02 18:06:49)
[...]
Dan Armstrong (don) wontfix'd it after stating that, quote:
If the maintainer is not given as a mailing list, then the uploaders
should all subscribe to the PTS for a given package.
[...]
I added th
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 01:06 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
> In the current version of the PTS, subscribing to a package means
> either a. after logging in, clicking the Subscribe button on
> tracker.debian.org/pkg/foo, and optionally changing topics
> ("keywords"); b. with devscripts installed, runnin
Hi all,
I am in strong favor of 1., letting BTS forward to Uploaders. I'm
Uploader for a few tens of (team-maintained) packages, most of which I
don't particularly care about since I only introduced them as
dependencies, and I'm not going to subscribe to all of them. Still, I do
feel responsi
I will just note that I have been a Debian Developer for almost 30 years,
and a few months after I started maintaining varnish and other related
packages I am still not sure if I did everything needed to receive one
and only one copy of new bug reports.
So I would welcome some rationalization in
Quoting Blair Noctis (2025-03-02 18:06:49)
[...]
> Dan Armstrong (don) wontfix'd it after stating that, quote:
>
> > If the maintainer is not given as a mailing list, then the uploaders
> > should all subscribe to the PTS for a given package.
[...]
> I added that a. team maintenance means hundreds
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:06:49AM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
3. Add the option to subscribe to a package on BTS
This would at least allow people who don't/wouldn't use PTS to receive new bug
reports for packages they care about. PTS is a separate service that happens to
forward BTS bug report
Dear -devel,
Way back in 2006 (19 years ago), #397761 was submitted to request for BTS to
forward bug reports also to the Uploaders.
Dan Armstrong (don) wontfix'd it after stating that, quote:
If the maintainer is not given as a mailing list, then the uploaders
should all subscribe to the PTS
25 matches
Mail list logo
