On 8 December 2013 02:50, Tae Wong wrote:
> There exists a Debian Developers team in Launchpad:
> https://launchpad.net/~debiandevelopers
>
Sure, it's not directly endorsed by debian-devel@lists.debian.org it's
a group of launchpad users that have launchpad accounts and formed a
team on launchpad
On 2 December 2013 23:08, Hector Oron wrote:
> 5 arm64 Debian port support
> ═══
>
> If Debian is unable to find ARM 64-bit hardware before Jessie gets
> frozen, it likely won't be Jessie supported.
>
>
What is the opportunity cost here? Are there no machine available
On 26 November 2013 10:42, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 04:19 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Svante Signell writes:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 00:16 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
The only way to address the Essential conflict for the jessie release
seems to be to move the contents
On 15 November 2013 12:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mark Brown
>
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
> Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
> URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
> License : GPL
> Programming
On 1 November 2013 13:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If cross-architecture dependencies are allowed in the archive (and don't
> break dak or britney) these days, then it's easy:
>
> Package: libnss-mdns
> Architecture: any
> Multi-Arch: same
>
> Package: lib32nss-mdns
> Architectu
On 25 October 2013 13:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/10/13 11:52, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> - using XDG_* environment variables, instead of LOGIND_* or SYSTEMD_*
>> variables
>
> I assume you mainly mean XDG_RUNTIME_DIR here, since the rest are
> basically user-level
On 25 October 2013 10:00, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:33:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Seems I misunderstood what logind was about. I thought it would force to
>> use specific Xdm implementations that would support it. So you do
>> confirm that it's not the case, and th
Hello,
On 25 October 2013 07:23, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:18:18AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> Changed-By: Andreas Moog [...]
>> away (0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* Non-maintainer upload
>> - d/p/01_fix_makefile: $LIBS need to
On 24 October 2013 17:38, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 18:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> What's the the status of XFCE regarding accessibility?
>>
>> That was a big strengh of GNOME for a long time, though I've heard
>> rumors (sorry not to be more specific) that gnome-shell
On 24 October 2013 15:15, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
> Le 24/10/2013 15:57, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>> On 24 October 2013 14:18, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I've written a tool to import Debian packages into Git:
>>>
>>> gi
On 24 October 2013 14:18, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
> Hello,
> I've written a tool to import Debian packages into Git:
>
> git clone deb::mypackage
>
> It does a faithful import of the package history from
> snapshot.debian.org. There is some agressive caching built-in, and a
> bit of logic
On 24 October 2013 10:59, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:11:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:09:46AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> > And I for one heavily use vservers
>>
>> It's a professional shame of mine that we are still trying to get rid
On 11 October 2013 22:34, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:55:34PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm not sure, but launchpad is running 64-bit machines even when
>> compiling for the i386 architecture, and then launchpad supports PAE
>>
On 11 October 2013 20:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 726009 serious
> thanks
>
> This remains a serious bug. Your package, which previously built on
> multiple architectures, is now failing to build due to memory exhaustion.
> While in some circumstances it is permissible to remove the old
On 18 September 2013 03:42, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
>> as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the release, but
>> allow the bugs opened for t
please ignore this thread.
I've now noticed these bug reports were raised to debian-devel in the
" link with -L/usr/lib" thread.
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
On 18 September 2013 02:54, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Dear YunQiang Su,
>
> It looks like this class of problems is r
Dear YunQiang Su,
It looks like this class of problems is reported against a lot of
packages now. Did you consult on debian-devel before doing this mass
bug filing?
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
On 17 September 2013 11:34, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: flash-kernel
> Version: 3.11
> X-Debbugs-CC: wzss..
On 30 August 2013 20:55, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> [...] using git instead of the file system for storing the contents
>> of Debian Code Search. The hope was that it would lead to fewer disk
>> seeks and less data due to gits delta-encoding
>
> Wouldn't ZFS be a more natural way to do s
On 29 August 2013 10:55, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/8/29 Dmitrijs Ledkovs :
>> Can dinstall be run every hour please? For me, if anything dinstall is
>> not frequent enough.
>
> No, dinstall takes more than an hour to finish...
>
Ok.
>> If it takes longer t
On 28 August 2013 21:58, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello Debian world,
>
> there is currently a discussion within the FTP Team and we appear to
> have two opinions on it. As we are open on the outcome and it basically
> affects the whole project, we came up with the following summary to
> solicit fee
On 12 August 2013 01:51, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> 3. all file names must be valid UTF-8
>
Case in point errors from ubuntu UDD package importer:
"""
Packages containing non-UTF-8, non-ASCII filenames. This is a problem.
It is unclear how to sensibly map these into Bazaar.
anon-proxy aspell-is as
On 25 August 2013 17:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:51:31PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I have maintenance access to UDD & have filed a few bugs about it, and
>> all I can say is that dgit so far is getting a lot of things right:
>
>
&
On 22 August 2013 20:52, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>
I have now started daily PPA builds for dgit, for all supported Ubuntu releases.
add-apt-repository ppa:xnox/dgit
Si
On 25 August 2013 12:04, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
>> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>>
>> >From the manpage:
>>
>>dgit [dgit-opts] clone [
On 31 May 2013 22:44, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> It's pretty much equivalent with one exception – I need to send USR2 on
> reload. Does upstart already have the support for custom reload signals?
>
Upstart 1.10 released today has the following new stanza thus you will
be able to specify:
"reload sign
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ocaml-estring
Version : git snapshot
Upstream Author : Jeremie Dimino
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/diml/estring
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Description : Estring: OCaml development
On 23 August 2013 00:38, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:52:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
>> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
>> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>>
>> >From the manpage:
>>
>>dgit [dgit-o
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libinotify-kqueue
Version : upstream snapshot from 20120419
Upstream Author : Dmitry Matveev
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/dmatveev/libinotify-kqueue
* License : MIT/BSD
Description
On 13 August 2013 19:59, Julien Cristau wrote:
> [why oh why are you breaking threading?]
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 19:51:52 +0200, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>
>> We have build log analyzers running for the build logs. And the
>> important compiler warnings (errors) fail
On 13 August 2013 14:36, Joey Hess wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> Is there any reason this hasn't been applied yet?
>> Can I NMU this, as debhelper is marked as LowNMU package.
>
> Not for reasons such as allowing patches like this.
>
Ok.
> Making all bu
On 17 June 2013 23:58, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> tags 680686 patch
> thanks
>
> On 14 June 2013 12:35, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>> - Fix debhelper not passing --disable-silent-rules by default.
>>#680686
>>I think cdbs already does this.
>
> P
On 12 August 2013 01:51, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:49:57PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I propose the following sub-goals:
>
> 1. all programs should, in their default configuration, accept UTF-8 input
>and pass it through uncorrupted. Having to manually specify en
On 6 August 2013 14:41, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the maintainer of Wt [1], a C++ web development library (think of Qt or
> Gtk+ for the web) and web server.
>
> My upstream [2] sent me a mail asking about mixing C++03 and C++11. My
> understanding is it is not possible for a va
On 1 August 2013 16:21, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:52:38PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 1 August 2013 15:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> >> [...] in preparation to add no
On 1 August 2013 15:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> [...] in preparation to add non-gzip compression support for control.tar
>
> May I ask why would you want that?
>
> There's a lot of extra complexity, incompatibility with existing tool
On 22 July 2013 10:17, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 22 juillet 2013 à 10:45 +0200, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
>> systemd being installed does not mean it will be used as init. The
>> package happens to contain a few tools the GNOME Shell needs, that is
>> all, to the best of my knowledge. It's a
On 18 July 2013 21:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thomas Goirand (2013-07-19):
>> So that brings me to ask: do you have an idea of how much work it would
>> be to have Upstart ported to kFreeBSD or Hurd (even if that would mean
>> loosing some of the functionality (obviously cgroups comes to mind))?
On 17 July 2013 17:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 05:38 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would not have posted if that had been the first time I found Joss'
>> advocacy offensive. It is, however, a repeated pattern.
>
>
> From which I would infer you shouldn't take it as a pe
On 16 July 2013 19:39, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:38:18PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 16 July 2013 17:07, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > Once the rootfs is mounted, we parse $root/etc/fstab and mount /usr
>> > using that information. When ini
On 16 July 2013 17:07, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:37:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think that we agreed on merging /usr at all. I have written
>> > some patches for initramfs-tools to permit fsck and mount
On 10 July 2013 09:20, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> There is a simple Perl script to do that:
>
> Thanks, what about including this capability in a-c-c itself?
>
I'd take a patch to dh-acc ;-)
>> my $Version = `dpkg -s $Package|grep Version`;
On 9 July 2013 10:18, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> So it is no need to create any input XML descriptors and compile header
>> files of a library anymore.
>>
>> However, this approach has some drawbacks. Perhaps the main drawback is the
>> inabil
On 7 Jul 2013 12:05, "Stéphane Glondu" wrote:
>
> Le 07/07/2013 08:39, Scott Leggett a écrit :
> >> you may not (and you may not permit anyone else to) copy, modify,
> >> create a derivative work of, reverse engineer, decompile or
> >> otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the Software o
On 2 July 2013 17:58, Nick Andrik wrote:
> 2013/7/2 Russ Allbery :
>> I don't believe the AGPL was ever intended to be used for libraries.
>> Quite a bit of the license is very difficult to interpret as applied to a
>> library. (For example, does that mean that every application using the
>> libr
Dear all,
On 30 June 2013 23:21, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>
>
> vtk source: lintian output: 'missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)',
> automatically rejected package.
> vtk source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to
On 25 June 2013 19:21, Alexandre Rebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> wrote:
>> From Ubuntu point of view, we'd also be interested in a similar
>> analysis. Unlike Debian we provide automatically generated packages
>>
On 21 June 2013 15:05, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> >> On 20 June 2
On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>> >
>> >> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I
On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>
>> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
>> instead shipping slightly larger block of code in the upstart package
>> which is sourced by /lib/lsb/init-functions from init-
On 20 June 2013 16:32, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
>> if init_is_upstart; then
>> upstart_job=/etc/init/$(basename ${0:-}).conf
>> if [ -f ${upstart_job:-} ] && [ ! -L ${upstart_job:-} ]; then
>
> Why the -L ?
>
! -L = not a
#s-upstart
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UpstartCompatibleInitScripts
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712763
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
Original Message
Subject: upstart: implementing Debian Policy §9.11.1
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:58:38 +0100
From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
To
#s-upstart
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UpstartCompatibleInitScripts
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712763
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
Original Message
Subject: upstart: implementing Debian Policy §9.11.1
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:58:38 +0100
From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
To
On 5 June 2013 23:42, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Russ Allbery , 2013-06-05, 15:02:
>
>> udev sucks! Debian should hire a developer to replace all uses of CDBS
>> with dh! Perl should be replaced with Python in essential! All packages
>> need to switch to 3.0 (quilt)! Native packages should be banne
On 5 June 2013 23:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Svante Signell writes:
>
>> Not everybody agrees to that, there is a split opinion about this.
>> Please lift this discussion a little higher: Which would be the default
>> desktop for jessie?
>
> Because we weren't having enough fun with systemd vs. up
On 24 May 2013 23:16, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2013/5/23 Helmut Grohne :
>> * stdout/stderr to syslog redirection
>>This is possibly implementable, but needs more than a line of shell.
>
> In Solaris SMF each service has its own log file with SMF messages
> *and* all stdout/stderr
>
> pashev@bok:~
On 23 May 2013 10:37, Ole Laursen wrote:
> Steve Langasek debian.org> writes:
>> Sorry you ran into trouble with upstart.
>
> Not a DD, just a happy Debian user, hope you'll excuse me, but on the topic
> of Upstart, I have some technical comments on why, surprisingly, I think it
> may not be matu
On 22 May 2013 03:32, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:16:29AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I have signed Canonical's and Python Software Foundation's contributor
>> agreements.
>> But I have no intention to assign copyright to FSF at the
On 22 May 2013 03:09, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 01:47:42 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 22 May 2013 01:16, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
>> >> On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum
On 22 May 2013 01:16, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
>> On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>&
On 13 May 2013 19:14, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Philip Hands writes:
>
>> No matter what the technical merits, the inevitable flame war regarding
>> copyright assignment seems very likely to render upstart a non-starter
>> as an essential element of Debian.
>
> Debian already uses many packages as pa
On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
> - Neither systemd nor upstart are likely to be ported to kfreebsd soon,
> as they both rely on many Linux-specific features and interfaces.
>
Well, Colin Watson, Matthias K
On 8 May 2013 01:46, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 07 May 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> As mentioned some months ago [0], I'm planning to switch dpkg-deb default
>> compressor from gzip to xz, as there seemed to be consensus that was
>> the way to go, and given the amount of already man
On 7 May 2013 05:38, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Hi Wookey,
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 03:04:50 +0100, Wookey wrote:
>> (just a decision to leave arch-independent headers in /usr/include and
>> move arch-dependent headers to /usr/include/triplet).
>
> Doesn't this limit us to cross-compiling only across De
On 22 April 2013 13:20, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:22:05PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I also posted on Debian Planet, how to find patches applied in Ubuntu
>> via Debian PTS together with categories of useful fixes that are
>> relevant to Jess
On 20 April 2013 12:37, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I came across this on Planet Debian
>
> http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog//posts/lack_of_cooperation_from_ubuntu/
>
> I'm guessing that Ubuntu may not have pushed the changes to sid because
> of the freeze, that may well be the answer to Rogério's qu
On 18 April 2013 19:13, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> By the way, have you contacted Sergei on this?
>
> I saw the bugreports and I'm planning to start working on them after
> wheezy release.
>
Yeah there is no rush r
On 18 April 2013 15:55, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 18 April 2013 16:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - Tcl/Tk: Wookey and Dimitrij did start on that in Ubuntu, patches
>>are available in Debian bug reports.
>>Currently the shared libraries are split out into separate packages,
>>
On 16 April 2013 13:29, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:11:24 +0400
> Игорь Пашев wrote:
>
>> 2013/4/16 Raphael Hertzog :
>> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>> >> I think it would be better to add multiarch dirs to DEFAULT_LIBRARY_PATH,
>> >> and put them in first position
On 4 April 2013 20:47, wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:09:04 +0200
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
>> This mail is a very good argument to confirm that overcomplicated
>> methods to make your point will just fail.
>>
>> If you have a point to make it, make ti. Once. With facts.
>
> I supplied plenty
On 2 April 2013 16:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> Apparently there are, but aside from that: should a 'bts' command on
>> $DERIVATIVE interact with the Debian bug-tracking system, or the
>> $DERIVATIVE bug-tracking system?
>
> This can/sho
On 29 March 2013 20:03, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently purchased an Acer S7, having both a keyboard and a touch
> screen. It is currently running Windows 8. Any chances of running Debian
> GNU/Linux on that box? I've heard rumours that Ubuntu supports this
> hardware, is that true?
>
On 29 March 2013 22:44, Bjoern Meier wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> 2013/3/29 John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell :
>> REALLY? you have 30 days to return it. if you want unix and touchscreen
>> get an Apple.
>>
>> don't use debian haphazardously (without knowing full well what can happen /
>> if it will wo
On 29 March 2013 22:19, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
wrote:
> REALLY? you have 30 days to return it. if you want unix and touchscreen
> get an Apple.
>
This whole email was very out of line, and it's not how I would like
Debian Community to be viewed as.
Debian is Universal OS and ther
On 15 March 2013 00:56, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> On 09/02/12 08:58, Paul Wise wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Philip Ashmore wrote:
>>
>>> I think Debian needs a way to be able to pick a point in history and
>>> obtain
>>> at least the versions + patches of all the source packages that
On 9 March 2013 02:11, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:52:43PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
>>
>> as for the combined search-engine through all source code (which is the
>> closest to your original use case) -- there is a (still non-official)
>> http://codesearch.debian.n
On 1 March 2013 10:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 06:07 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> Has anybody had experience controlling access to git repositories, for
>>> example, to give users access but prevent some of the fo
On 28 February 2013 20:03, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
wrote:
> Please Cc:, not subscribed to the debian-devel@lists.debian.org list.
>
> Hi there! Linus Torvalds is highly involved in this project :)
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>
>> The problem is that our target audience are dive
On 28 February 2013 09:39, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> There was recently some discussion in pkg-javascript about how to give
> more people access to the VCS (e.g. keeping the git repositories
> logically organised under the pkg-javascript tree, but making write
> access available to all DDs + alio
On 10 February 2013 16:54, Matthias Klose wrote:
> There are 126 source packages needing updates. The list of packages
> and maintainers is attached below. I'll file bug reports later (user:
> d...@debian.org, tag: pillow).
>
I see that a few packages were identified to work out of the box by
fed
On 24 January 2013 04:56, Paul Johnson wrote:
> This is a multiarch issue I had not considered before. Have you seen
> it? I never wanted to be a "cross compiler", I really only want to
> build amd64. But I have some i386 libraries for a particular program
> (acroread).
>
I recently had to build
On 31 January 2013 08:25, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 31/01/2013 13:32, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
>>> >
>> Don't forget package.el for emacs!
>
> Wait, what? package.el uses Ruby, and not elisp?
>
How did we start a thread on go packaging and now mention TeX Live
package manager (tlmgr) ?!
Re
On 28 January 2013 18:17, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:36:45AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Tollef Fog Heen writes:
>> > ]] Gergely Nagy
>>
>> >> No, not really. I don't really care what tools one uses, as long as the
>> >> result is reasonably easy *and* reliable to work with
On 27 January 2013 18:32, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Jakub Wilk writes:
>
>> Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote on his blog[0]:
>>
>>> Generally if software is useful in Debian Project it can be useful
>>> for other debian-like and unlike projects. In particular native
>>
On 15 January 2013 04:46, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> # fancy-dget http://http.debian.net/debian/ experimental mypackage
>
> would download the newest mypackage source from experimental. Bonus
> points if messing with the system wide sources.list is avoided entirely
> and no root privileges are require
On 2 January 2013 14:32, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 10:56:53AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> > $ man debian-distro-info
>> >
>> > Debian OS provides API to query such information.
On 1 January 2013 19:47, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi Dmitrijs,
>
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>> What about multiarch?
> I tried to address this on the wiki page, see
> http://wiki.debian.org/MichaelStapelberg/GoPackaging#Multi-Arch.2Fcross-compiling
>
I was more conc
On 1 January 2013 15:44, Michael Stapelberg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am co-maintainer of the golang package and spent a few hours on trying
> to figure out how to best create Debian packages for libraries and
> programs which are implemented in Go.
>
> I have documented my thoughts, conclusions and exam
On 30 December 2012 19:23, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> Would it be an idea to publish the list of version numbers and associated
>> code names a few releases ahead, say the upcoming three releases? Of
>> course the prerogative of deciding on the names
On 7 December 2012 23:36, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Svante Signell writes:
>
>> this time installing surveillance code.
>
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
>> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do
>
>> Any reason Debian should be so clo
On 1 December 2012 15:42, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 12:10, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
>> Sections or Cover Texts:
>>
>> bash
>> binutils
>> tar
>>
>> As per GR 2006-001 such works are not suitable for main:
>> ht
On 26 November 2012 00:50, brian m. carlson
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19:18AM +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> If your e-mail processing machinery cannot handle duplicate messages
>> (due to cross-postings and CC's), maybe you should get an a better
>>
Hello there,
On 25 November 2012 20:35, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, 07:27:31 LHST, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I see many note in this list like:
>> "I'm registered to the list. So please *do not* Cc: me."
>>
>> So I'd like to note:
>>
>> 1. Some e-mail cleints make it h
On 20 November 2012 12:23, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I am sorry, if I was not clear. I am aware of the "last iteration",
>> but I am not enquiring about the default policy within debian as to
>> how we sh
On 20 November 2012 23:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 13:52:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:48:22PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Okay. I did some tests with various packages. From binary only to text
>> only.
>
> Thanks for the tests Bastian. It wou
On 20 November 2012 16:12, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed
>> by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do?
>
> Ther
On 20 November 2012 14:42, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>
>> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php
On 20 November 2012 14:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dmitrijs,
>
> am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd
>> above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the
>> build packages..
On 20 November 2012 13:47, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> >> I currently do not have faci
On 20 November 2012 13:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
>> with the host running Debian's kernel.
>
> So how can you prove that the package bu
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
