On 16 April 2013 13:29, Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:11:24 +0400 > Игорь Пашев <pashev.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2013/4/16 Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org>: >> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Игорь Пашев wrote: >> >> I think it would be better to add multiarch dirs to DEFAULT_LIBRARY_PATH, >> >> and put them in first positions. >> > >> > Why? >> > >> > This modules tries to mimick ld.so's logic to find libraries as closely >> > as possible. >> >> /lib:/usr/lib was the default path, now it is >> /lib/<multiarch>:/usr/lib/<multiarch>, isn't it? > > > MultiArch in Debian is principally concerned with runtime paths, the > build-time paths and consequent cross-compilation support still has a > few wrinkles to resolve. (or dpkg-cross could have been removed from > Wheezy.) >
Well, despite policy not settled people started to multi-arch enable -dev packages in a quite aggressively. Because well, it's convenient. I found 140+ dev packages on my system that do so. http://paste.ubuntu.com/5713071/ And well, since these are multi-arch same and presumably co-installable, that mean that .so symlink is not in /usr/lib/ any more for all of them. So we better figure out the Multi-arch-dev story sooner than later =) Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhlui9b_pylrugdstjngmunzndx53exgmjotjb4t638...@mail.gmail.com
