Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Guimard
* Package name: libplack-handler-anyevent-fcgi-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Plack-Handler-AnyEvent-FCGI
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Guimard
* Package name: libanyevent-fcgi-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Vitaly Kramskikh,
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/AnyEvent-FCGI
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descrip
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. They're asking you to
> provide the same licence for your contributions, as the licence for the
> existing Gitlab software. Every FOSS project expects that, even if
> they don't make su
On 08/06/16, 10:41pm, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 19:40 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core /
>
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Another possible option is Pagure
> https://pagure.io/
Wow, that's an attractive option. Thanks!
> Written in Python and developed by Fedora.
Apropos the discussions in this thread: Pagora uses Gitolite
https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/overview.html> as its component for
m
Hi,
Am 8. Juni 2016 22:47:24 MESZ, schrieb Julien Cristau :
>On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 15:56:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
>> We’ll have to allow for some diversity, if only to try new paths (and
>> then, eventually, cut off old ones). Especially as long as there is
>> motivation.
>>
>I have
On Jun 07, 2016, at 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>I have started a wiki page to compare gitolite and gitlab
>https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/GitNext
Another possible option is Pagure
https://pagure.io/
Written in Python and developed by Fedora.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpAFfrqLj5m8.pgp
Description:
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 19:40 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
[...]
> Debian needs feature X but it is already in the e.nterprise version. We make
> a patch and for commercial reasons it never gets merged (they already sell it
> in the enterprise version). Which means we will have to fork the software a
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 19:40 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> > > model. For such a crucial service I wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Breno Leitao
* Package name: genwqe-user
Version : 4.0.17
Upstream Author : Frank Haverkamp
* URL : https://github.com/ibm-genwqe/genwqe-user
* License : Apache Version 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : A hard
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 15:56:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> We’ll have to allow for some diversity, if only to try new paths (and
> then, eventually, cut off old ones). Especially as long as there is
> motivation.
>
I haven't seen much motivation to maintain alioth (especially the
fusionfo
]] Ian Jackson
> But what you are saying is that they must, right away, pick a fight
> with the administrators and users of the existing services. They have
> to declare their intent to obsolete it and write out a detailed plan
> on how everyone will have to change.
>
> I think that this would
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 02:55 PM, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
> > mailto:hol...@layer-acht.org>> wrote:
> >>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
> >
> > I'm... actually
Mo Zhou writes:
> (Keep me in CC list please)
Done.
> I'm working on some packages whose upstream (github) doesn't make
> releases. So I need to invent upstream versions, that's OK.
Can you appeal to upstream to make releases? The Upstream Guide
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#Releases_a
Le 08/06/2016 à 10:53, Christiaan de Die le Clercq a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> Though I am not involved in this discussion and didn't read a lot of
> previous emails about this. I am going to assume it would be hosted on
> Debian's servers and not with Gitlab's hosted services. We use Gogs at
> the office
On 06/08/2016 02:08 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 11:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> So, say I want to contribute to a project I don't normally work in. Steps
>> in alioth:
>>
>
> [...]
>
> Well, I would go this route:
>
> - git clone
> - hack
> - git commit -a -v
> - git format
On 06/08/2016 02:55 PM, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
> mailto:hol...@layer-acht.org>> wrote:
>>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
>
> I'm... actually gonna save this for later because it helps me understand
> the alio
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
wrote:
>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
I'm... actually gonna save this for later because it helps me understand
the alioth workflow.
I'm still relatively fresh to Debian dev and can say, without any doubt,
ali
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> > I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
>> > model. For such a crucial service I would r
On 2016-06-08 11:08:02, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> > model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
> > system. But maybe I am alo
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
wrote:
>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
What Holger says +1.
I must say that I like the discussion style shown in this thread up to
now. Please more of this friendly constructivism.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:21:30 +0100, Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
>If it takes off and is popular, then migrating to a .org, what happens to
>Alioth,
>where git.d.o point etc. are all things to worry about in the future, but
>they're
>moot if it doesn't take off. So focus on getting a separate service
On 06/08/2016 11:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
[...]
>
> So, say I want to contribute to a project I don't normally work in. Steps
> in alioth:
>
[...]
Well, I would go this route:
- git clone
- hack
- git commit -a -v
- git format-patch -1 --to=proj...@lists.alioth.debian.org | mailx -t
>
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> > model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
> > system. But maybe I am alo
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 08/06/16 07:57 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >> for authentication, I think you should probably use the Debian SSO with
> >> clie
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-pkg-errors
Version : 0.6.0+git20160608.5.2af433a-1
Upstream Author : Dave Cheney
* URL : https://github.com/pkg/errors
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Descripti
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Luca Filipozzi writes ("Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was:
> Next steps for gitlab.debian)"):
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > > That speaks more to the need of actually droppin
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 20:29 +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Tell me an "easy" way to do merging in alioth,
I think perhaps it hasn't been made clear to folks on this thread that
gitlab is more like a github style thing (with a webui for PRs and
whatnot) rather than a more "traditional"/"simple" git h
Luca Filipozzi writes ("Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was:
Next steps for gitlab.debian)"):
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > That speaks more to the need of actually dropping the not-shiny-anymore
> > services rather than block adding a new
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Git is not only for code hosting. It is also a tool for collaborating,
> even with people not formally affiliated with your project.
>
> So, say I want to contribute to a project I don't normally work in. Steps
> in alioth:
>
> -
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> But that doesn't mean we as a project have to run and keep maintaining
> >> all the things that were once shiney.
> >
> > +1
>
> That speaks more to the need of actually dropping the not-shiny-anymore
> services rather than blo
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:14:36 +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 08/06/16 15:10, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
>
> Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it for git
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Free Ekanayaka
* Package name: webhook
Version : 2.3.8
Upstream Author : Adnan Hajdarevic
* URL : https://github.com/adnanh/webhook
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Small server for creating HTT
08/06/2016
TO: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Czy potrzebujesz zatwierdzony biznes i prywatnego kredytu / Finansowanie w
maksymalnej wysokosci 3% w skali roku. Skontaktuj sie z nami po wiecej
szczególów w razie zainteresowania.
Dziekuje.
BSN Capital
Zarzadzanie
(C) 2016
On ബുധന് 08 ജൂണ് 2016 07:44 വൈകു, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it for git hosting?
> You do some ssh and make a repo and then you just pull and push as you
> would with anything else.
>
Tell me an "easy" way to do merging in alioth, and then let
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:14:36PM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 08/06/16 15:10, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
>
> Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it
On 08/06/16 10:17 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Alexandre Viau writes:
>> - DDs login with Debian SSO and upload their public key on the web inteface
>
> Just a question: aren't there already SSH keys in ldap, and can't these
> be re-used?
If that is possible, then yes! It would be great.
But thi
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:44:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...] see bug #770492.
Truly amazing! For "ping", it would be like this:
$ /sbin/getcap /bin/ping
/bin/ping = cap_net_raw+ep
$ chown root:root /bin/ping
chown: changing ownership of '/bin/ping': Operation not permitted
$ /sbin/getca
Alexandre Viau writes:
> - DDs login with Debian SSO and upload their public key on the web inteface
Just a question: aren't there already SSH keys in ldap, and can't these
be re-used?
Best regards
Ole
Hi All,
On 08/06/16 15:10, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it for git hosting?
You do some ssh and make a repo and then you just pull and push
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 08, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
>
> > Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> > gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> > because it's shiny?
> Since usability is the main reason man
On 08/06/16 07:57 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> for authentication, I think you should probably use the Debian SSO with
>> client certificates:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSingle
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:57:10PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday 08 June 2016 01:07 AM, Bastian Blank wro
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 13:46 + schrieb Luca Filipozzi:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:17:44PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> beca
Hello!
On 08/06/16 09:13 AM, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I read all the uscan examples, and it seems that uscan
> works basing on http and ftp only. That is to say uscan
> will not scan Git repos so the above demand won't be
> satisfied.
`man uscan` will tell you that there is a `git mode`. Unfortunately,
t
On Jun 08, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> because it's shiny?
Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
"because it's shiny" is a
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:17:44PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> > > migrating
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 14:56 -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> > > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping
> > > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get:
>
Hi folks,
(Keep me in CC list please)
I'm working on some packages whose upstream (github)
doesn't make releases. So I need to invent upstream
versions, that's OK. However when one is going to
maintain a number of packages that watch is not present,
upstream update tracking by hand would be a nig
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> > migrating git.debian.org
>
> Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
* Package name: haskell-monadplus
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Hans Hoglund
* URL : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/monadplus
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ana Custura
* Package name: python-cymruwhois
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Justin Azoff
* URL : https://github.com/JustinAzoff/python-cymruwhois
* License : X11
Programming Lang: Python
Description : python li
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 08 June 2016 01:07 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > [SN: trimmed Cc list, as this is about what Debian wants]
> > >
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 08 June 2016 01:07 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > [SN: trimmed Cc list, as this is about what Debian wants]
> > >
> > > Hi Alex
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:0
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:53, Christiaan de Die le Clercq wrote:
> >
> > On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > > On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> > migrating git.debian.org
>
> Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab instance is one thing,
> mi
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:56:11PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> >> On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping
> >> binary had the suid bit set. Now I ge
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:15:29PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2016 02:51 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> >> Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> >> migrating git.debian.
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:53, Christiaan de Die le Clercq wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a
On 2016-06-08 10:45, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Wednesday 08 June 2016 02:51 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help
with
migrating git.debian.org
Whoah there. Running an of
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 09:41:11 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> setting up this gitlab thing is one thing, but moving away from alioth
> has this problem that we'll need to keep (svn|cvs|bzr|hg|...).debian.org
> as not only some packages workflows depend on it, but also parts of our
> own
On Wednesday 08 June 2016 02:51 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
>> migrating git.debian.org
>
> Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab instance is one
Hi,
setting up this gitlab thing is one thing, but moving away from alioth
has this problem that we'll need to keep (svn|cvs|bzr|hg|...).debian.org
as not only some packages workflows depend on it, but also parts of our
own infrastructure.
Does anyone has any idea how to do this in practice, wit
Hi,
On Tue Jun 07, 2016 at 10:19:48 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Another prerequisite for
> >d.o
> >hosting is that it runs on a DSA-managed machine.
>
> How do I get such a machine? Since Gitlab Inc, is sponsoring this
> hosting, should we get a new machine and set it up as per DSA
> standa
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:35:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Because that's the point of this thread. Notice the subject? That's the
> point I'm making.
I think I like the new, angry Russ :>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
> system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion.
You are not alone, but please
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> migrating git.debian.org
Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab instance is one thing, migrating
git.debian.org is quite another. Did I miss where t
On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
>>> model. For such a crucial service I would re
On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
>> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
>> system. But maybe I am alon
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
> system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion.
You're not alone. The open co
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2016 01:07 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > [SN: trimmed Cc list, as this is about what Debian wants]
> >
> > Hi Alex
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:06:41PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >> Its more things like:
> >> - integratio
On Wednesday 08 June 2016 01:07 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [SN: trimmed Cc list, as this is about what Debian wants]
>
> Hi Alex
>
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:06:41PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> Its more things like:
>> - integration into alioth - aka, how easy is it to integrate the already
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Fok
* Package name: golang-github-bowery-prompt
Version : 0.0~git20150722.0.3a76720-1
Upstream Author : Bowery, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/Bowery/prompt
* License : MIT (Expat)
Programming Lang: Go
Descri
73 matches
Mail list logo
