On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:53, Christiaan de Die le Clercq wrote: > > > > On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > > On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > >>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / > > >>> enterprise" > > >>> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open > > >>> source > > >>> system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion. > > >> You're not alone. The open core approach of Gitlab worries me greatly. > > >> > > >> (I'm just a random Debian developer. I no particular say in this.) > > > +1 > > +1 > > Though I am not involved in this discussion and didn't read a lot of > > previous emails about this. I am going to assume it would be hosted on > > Debian's servers and not with Gitlab's hosted services. We use Gogs at > > the office, a (MIT licensed) Gitlab alternative. > > https://github.com/gogits/gogs > > It might be worth checking out. > > +1 > > We also tried Gogs and it works very well and looks promising but we > didn't yet moved our repos from gitolite to gogs so I can't tell for > sure would it be good for Debian. IMHO, it is worth some investigation. I am a heavy gogs user, but its feature set is currently too limited and it is not as adaptable as I would like. I am also not sure how it will scale with more than 20.000 [1] git repos.
Just my 2 cent Alex [1] grep -c repo.url cgitrc.repos 23092 >
