On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:53, Christiaan de Die le Clercq wrote: > > On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise" > >>> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source > >>> system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion. > >> You're not alone. The open core approach of Gitlab worries me greatly. > >> > >> (I'm just a random Debian developer. I no particular say in this.) > > +1 > +1 > Though I am not involved in this discussion and didn't read a lot of > previous emails about this. I am going to assume it would be hosted on > Debian's servers and not with Gitlab's hosted services. We use Gogs at > the office, a (MIT licensed) Gitlab alternative. > https://github.com/gogits/gogs > It might be worth checking out. +1
We also tried Gogs and it works very well and looks promising but we didn't yet moved our repos from gitolite to gogs so I can't tell for sure would it be good for Debian. IMHO, it is worth some investigation.
